VadeLab

Housing & Tenancy

Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·07 Jul 2025

Tribunal sets £1,094/month rent for assured tenancy in London

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·14 Aug 2025

Tribunal Sets £850/month Rent for Assured Tenancy in Wisbech

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·21 Jul 2025

Tribunal Reduces Financial Penalties for Failing to License Properties

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·15 Jul 2025

Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: Factors Considered

The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1,700 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·07 Jul 2025

Tenant Awarded Reasonable Costs Under the 1993 Act

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·02 Jul 2025

Tenant Successfully Acquires Freehold Through Leasehold Reform Act

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·24 Jun 2025

First-tier Tribunal Decides Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·24 Jun 2025

Tribunal sets £136.43 weekly rent for assured tenancy in London

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a tenant under the Rent Act 1977. The rent was set at £136.43 per week, taking into account the Retail Price Index and relevant orders.

Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·20 Jun 2025

Improvement Notices Confirmed with Variations

Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·18 Jun 2025

Tribunal Partially Approves Service Charge Claims for Liverpool Tenants

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the reasonableness of different service charges under lease agreements. Some costs were fully allowed, while a person were partially allowed or disallowed entirely.

Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·13 May 2026

Tribunal Sets £690/month Rent for Assured Tenancy in Southampton

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·23 Oct 2025

Tribunal Sets £1,360/Month Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy in St John's Wood

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·12 Aug 2025

First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Decision — Case 4135145

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £600, excluding water rates and council tax, starting from April 6th, 2025.

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·12 Aug 2025

First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Decision — Case 4135147

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·31 Jul 2025

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £800

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·23 Jul 2025

Tribunal sets £107/week fair rent for assured tenancy in Sunderland

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) has decided on a fair rent for a property. They set the rent at £107.00 per week, following the rules laid out in the Rent Act 1977.

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·02 Jul 2025

Tribunal Sets £700 Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy in Manchester

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting the monthly rent at £700. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988, ensuring the tenant's rent aligns with legal standards.

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·02 Jul 2025

Tribunal Sets £75.77 Weekly Rent for Assured Tenancy in Newcastle

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the weekly rent at £75.77, which excludes water rates and council tax but includes service charges. This decision took effect on April 7, 2025.

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·02 Jul 2025

Tribunal sets £1,050/month rent for assured tenancy in Sunderland

AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·20 Jun 2025

Lessor Granted Dispensation From Consultation Requirements for Urgent Works

The First-tier Tribunal granted permission to a person to bypass the consultation requirements for urgent works, ruling that a person could not prove they were harmed by the lack of consultation.

← PreviousPage 116 · 16096 judgmentsNext →