
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal (a person) ruled that a financial penalty imposed on a leaseholder was invalid due to issues with the selective licensing scheme and the presence of a statutory defence. This means the leaseholder won't have to pay the penalty.
The tribunal varied a suspended a person, confirming fire and lighting hazards as Category 1, due to health and safety concerns in a residential property.
The First-tier Tribunal granted a rent repayment order against a landlord for failing to obtain a license to manage a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO). The decision was based on the landlord's violation of the Housing Act 2004.
The First-tier Tribunal set the market rent for an assured shorthold tenancy at £1,300 pcm, effective from May 5th, 2024. This decision was based on the current rental levels in the area.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair a person of £770 per month for a property in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire. The decision was based on the property's condition, location, and other relevant factors, and did not find a scarcity of similar properties in the area.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled on the costs payable by a Right to Manage company to landlords or tenants after receiving a claim notice. The Tribunal found the costs reasonable despite arguments from the respondents.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy in Wembley, ensuring it reflects current market values.
The First-tier Tribunal determined a new fair rent for a property, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables. The decision was made in accordance with the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to bypass consultation requirements for rebuilding a front boundary wall, deeming the work necessary and urgent, ensuring no unfair burden on tenants.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that the tenant's challenge to the landlord's service charges was valid, ordering the landlord to repay overcharged amounts and prohibiting the passing of tribunal costs through service charges.