
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal varied the leases of flats to include improvements after a vote by all leaseholders, clarifying management costs and improving certainty for leaseholders and the freeholder, under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that a landlord cannot claim costs from an a company if the RTM claim is withdrawn and the a company acted reasonably.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that the tenant failed to comply with lease requirements regarding subletting notifications and fees. The tenant was required to provide notice and verified copies of tenancy agreements to the landlord within four weeks of subletting, but failed to do so.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a new market rent for a property under an assured tenancy. They set the rent at £590 per week, effective from April 7th, 2025, after considering the property's condition and modern amenities.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent for a property by looking at similar rental prices in the area and the condition of the property. The rent was set at £1,275 per month, starting from 1 September 2025.
The First-tier Tribunal approved a pitch fee increase of £150.32 per month for a mobile home park, despite tenants' complaints about lighting issues. The decision was based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £390.00 per week for a property under the Rent Act 1977. The decision was based on the market approach and the maximum fair rent regulations.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent for a property, taking into account variable service charges and changes in the Retail Price Index. The fair rent was set at £126.75 per week, including service charges of £34.25.
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to skip the usual consultation process for urgent repairs needed due to water leakage. The decision was based on the urgency and necessity of the repairs.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) ruled that a landlord could bypass consultation requirements for urgent repairs needed to fix water ingress issues. The decision was made because the repairs were deemed urgent and reasonable.