VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1700 for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1700.00 per month, considering the property's condition and market value. This decision helps tenants understand how rents are determined for their properties.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination considering the property's condition and market value.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancyproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the property's condition and market value.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a rent of £1700.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, applying a 15% deduction due to the property's condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a rent of £1700.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and market value. The decision was made by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) on 23 September 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. GB/LON/00AZ/MNR/2024/0295

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

R Waterhouse FRICS

Landlord [RESPONDENT]

25 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE].

Tenant [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1700.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 May 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per n/a

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 5 August 2021

6. Length of the term or rental period 24 months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord external structural

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none

9. Description of premises one living room, two bedrooms, one kitchen and one bathroom

Chairman R Waterhouse FRICS Date of Decision 23 September 2025

(c)

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : GB/LON/00AZ/MNR/2025/0776 Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]. Tenant : [NAME] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of [NAME] : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : [NAME] and venue of Consideration : Determination on papers with no inspection. Date of Full Reasons : 23 September 2025

_______________________________________________

(c)

2

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1700.00 per month with effect from 1 May 2024. ____________________________________

Full REASONS

Background 1. On 26 February 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1750.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1500.00 per month to take effect from 1 May 2024.

2. On 30 April 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 30 April 2024. A copy of a tenancy agreement was supplied, as was a copy of the Notice of Increase of Rent.

3. The determination was carried out on the papers and no inspection was undertaken.

Property Description

4.The property was described in the [NAME] form as comprising one living room, one kitchen, one bathroom, and two bedrooms. The tribunal has not inspected the property.

Submissions

Applicant tenant submissions

5. The applicant provided evidence from a number of sources.

The [NAME] form noted that the property has a garden, but the tenant submits they have been unable to use it owing to debris in the garden belonging to the landlord and the landlords visiting the garden,

From the [NAME] form the tenant notes the contractual tenancy runs from 5 August 2021 to 5 August 2023, and the tenant is currently holding over.

In terms of condition the tenant notes from the [NAME] form; “the property was and continues to be in great disrepair- mould, damp, mouse infestation, and general poor state of property. Completely un-refurbished- alot has been spent in trying to simply do the basics before there was an attempt to make it a home at my expense ... The living room floor was completely replaced, both bedroom floors were broken in places, dangerous too – I had carpets fitted in

(c)

3 both, fitted a stair carpet for the four steps in the property and throughout all hallways, bathroom and kitchen a lino was fitted. “

In addition, the tenant notes replacement of toilet seat, painting of tiles and issues with mould.

Respondent Landlords Submission

The tribunal has received no submissions from the landlord.

Determination and Valuation

The tribunal first considered what the property would rent for if in good tenable condition.

In the absence of evidence of rental submissions from the parties the tribunal being an expert tribunal drew on its expertise of rental figures in the vicinity.

The tribunal determines that if the accommodation were in good tenantable condition, then it would attract a rent of £2000.00 per month.

From the description of the property, unchallenged by the Respondent Landlord the tribunal makes a deduction of 15%.

The tribunal determines that after the [NAME] of 15% the rent determined is £1700.00 per month.

Hardship

The Notice of increase identifies the start date for the new rent as 1 May 2024.

The tribunal has not received any submissions on the question of hardship and so determines the rent determined should have effect from 1 May 2024.

Chairman: R Waterhouse FRICS Date: 23 September 2025

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by [NAME] a written [NAME] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which [NAME] must:

(c)

4 a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the [NAME] written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the [NAME] is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a determination of rent based on the property's condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on comparable rents in the area.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the actual condition of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and specifications.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusted for the property's condition.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided on a rent of £1700.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord in an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided by considering the property's condition and comparing it to market values.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparability to market standards.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be adjusted based on the condition of their property and market conditions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as the tenancy agreement and the Notice of Increase of Rent were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.