VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: First-tier Tribunal Decision

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £2100.00 per month, effective from January 13, 2025, after reviewing comparable evidence and the state of the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination based on the open market value of the property.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the original tenancy, excluding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £2100.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after considering comparable evidence and the condition of the property. The decision took effect from 13 January 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. FR/LON/00AK/MNR/2025/0652

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Flat 9A [NAME], [NAME], London, [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT], 3-5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 2100.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13 January 2025

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per n/a

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced Periodic tenancy

6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord external structural

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none

9. Description of premises Three-bedroom, flat, double glazing, central heating, living room and bathroom.

[NAME] of Decision 6 May 2025

(c) [NAME] 2025

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : FR/LON/00AK/MNR/2025/0652 Property : Flat 9A [NAME], [NAME], London [POSTCODE] Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT] Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : [NAME] and venue of Consideration : Determination on Papers Date of Summary Reasons : 6 May 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £2100.00 per calendar month with effect from 13 January 2025. ____________________________________

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 28 November 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2100.00 in place of the existing rent of £1300.00 per month to take effect from 13 January 2025.

2. On 5 January 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 6 January 2025.

(c) [NAME] 2025

2

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £2100.00 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

As identified in e mail from Enfield Council 6 December 2024;

Leak into kitchen requiring removal and replacement of defective bath Adjust bathroom door Repair damaged ceiling to hallway Repair damaged walls to ground floor hallway Up to date Gas Safety Certificate Electrical Installation Report required Damp and Mould Defective Windows. Repair Front Door.

These items have been rectified by as confirmed by Enfield Council e mail dated 26 March 2025.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

per calendar month Market Rent

£2100.00

Less List any deductions none

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £2100.00 per calendar month.

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy was £2100.00 per calendar month.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £2100.00 to take effect on 13 January 2025. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

(c) [NAME] 2025

3

Chairman: [NAME]: 6 May 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the rent based on comparable evidence and its own expert knowledge of rental values.
  • The Tribunal found that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition was £2100.00 per calendar month.
  • The Tribunal confirmed that previously identified issues like leaks, damaged walls, and defective windows had been rectified.
  • The new rent of £2100.00 per calendar month was directed to take effect from January 13, 2025, as proposed by the landlord.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new rent of £2100.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property, setting the rent at £2100.00 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the evidence presented regarding comparable rents and the condition of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord, setting a higher rent than the tenant requested.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should gather evidence on comparable rents and the condition of their property to support their case.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and the condition of the property were crucial in making the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed if there are grounds for doing so.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.