Correction Certificate for Lease Variation Decision
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal issued a correction certificate to fix small mistakes in a previous decision about changing lease agreements for residential properties.
⚖️ Legal holding
A correction certificate may be issued to correct minor errors in a tribunal decision.
📖 Technical summary
Correction certificate issued for minor corrections in a First-tier Tribunal decision regarding lease variations.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal issued a correction certificate to amend minor errors in a previous decision concerning the variation of residential property leases.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Other
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 05BA
In the FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Tribunal Case reference : LON/00BG/LVT/2017/0002 Property : 1-24, 26-60, 61-[ADDRESS], 22, 24 & 28 Wapping High Street, E1W Applicant : [redacted] consented to the application Respondents : [redacted] [COMPANY]) [COMPANY] (2) [COMPANY] (3) The leaseholders of the 94 flats who have not consented to the application Type of application : To vary two or more leases by a majority Tribunal Judge : [NAME] of certificate : 10 April 2026
CORRECTION CERTIFICATE
This certificate is issued in respect of the tribunal’s decision dated 10 July 2017 (‘The Decision’) pursuant to Rule 50 Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013. The Decision is corrected as follows: 1. To page 1 of The Decision: To remove [COMPANY] and replace it with [COMPANY] 2. To page 2 of The Decision:
2 To remove the words “[COMPANY]” and replace them with “[COMPANY] or [COMPANY]” in point 7 3. To page 3 of The Decision: To remove in point 15 the words “[COMPANY]” and replace them with “[COMPANY]” 4. To the Deed of Variation attached to The Decision: (a) On the front page, remove the party to the Deed noted as “[COMPANY]” and replace it with the words “[COMPANY] or [COMPANY]” (b) On page 1, in the Definitions section starting with “[COMPANY]” to remove the words “[COMPANY] ([COMPANY] no 01623496)” and replace them with the words “[COMPANY] or [COMPANY] (now known as [COMPANY] no 02061041)”
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Varies Leases to Reflect Modern Building Changes
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Appoints Manager Due to Lease Breach
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Emergency Building Repairs Without Leaseholder…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation From Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Orders Landlord to Remedy Fire Safety Defects at Somerville Court
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Orders Remediation of Building Safety Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Varies Leases for Consistent Service Charge Percentages
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Insulation Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Freehold Purchase Premium at £24,262
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal's decision needed to be corrected to replace one company name with another.
- The decision required correction to include an alternative company name in a specific point.
- A particular company name in point 15 of the decision needed to be removed and replaced.
- The Deed of Variation attached to the decision needed correction to reflect the correct party.
- The definitions section of the Deed of Variation required updating with the current company name and number.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It issued a correction certificate to correct minor errors in a previous decision.
Who was involved?
The decision involved leaseholders and property management companies.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to issue a correction certificate because there were minor errors in the original decision.
Which laws or rules were applied?
No specific laws or rules were mentioned in the correction certificate.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The need to correct minor errors in the original decision was the main argument.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was neutral, focusing on correcting errors.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure that any errors in their decision are corrected.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The original decision and the identified errors were the primary focus.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Appeals are generally not available for correction certificates.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for specific legal issues.