VadeLab

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) case law

Judgments from the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions. The original content is public and official; the summaries and analysis are produced by VadeLab's technology.

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·15 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Orders Full Rehearing After Finding Legal Errors in PIP Decision

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·10 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeals on Income Support Overpayment Recovery

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·19 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal Over Error of Law in Freedom of Information Request

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·10 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal on Personal Independent Payment

The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal challenging a denial of Personal Independent Payment (PIP) to a claimant. The decision was overturned because the assessment of the claimant's condition was inconsistent, especially concerning the impact of his depression when his children were not around.

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·10 Jan 2018

Appeal Set Aside Due to Error of Law: Case Remanded for New Hearing

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal on Standard National Vehicular Licence

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Reviews Child Support Calculations

The Upper Tribunal reviewed decisions on child support calculations made by the First-tier Tribunal. They affirmed five decisions but set aside one due to a legal error.

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Dismisses Child Support Appeal

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·23 Sept 2019

Upper Tribunal Upholds Exemptions for National Security and Legal Advice Under Freedom of Information Act

The Upper Tribunal dismissed appeals challenging the refusal of information requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, upholding exemptions for national security and legal advice.

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Upholds Refusal of Goods Vehicles Operator's Licence

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Grants Permission for PIP Appeal

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Overturns PIP Mobility Assessment Due to Error

The Upper Tribunal decided that the lower tribunal made a mistake by not considering the claimant's inability to walk during times when he was bedridden. This impacted the assessment of the mobility component of Personal Independence Payment.

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Jan 2018

Appeal Allowed: Claimant's Right to Reside Upheld by Upper Tribunal

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Dismisses Child Maintenance Appeal

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·02 Jan 2018

Upper Tribunal Reinstates Claimant's Personal Independence Payment Benefits

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·19 Dec 2017

Upper Tribunal Rules Directors Need CPC When Driving Minibuses for Hire or Reward

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·28 Aug 2020

Upper Tribunal Upholds Claim for Reduced Earnings Allowance Due to Occupational Deafness

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·19 Dec 2017

Upper Tribunal Overturns Decision on Personal Independence Payment Mobility Component

AllowedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·18 Dec 2017

Upper Tribunal Allows Appeal Against Personal Independence Payment Decision

DismissedUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)·14 Dec 2017

Upper Tribunal Rejects Appeal on PSV License 'Main Occupation' Test

The Upper Tribunal rejected an appeal over a denied restricted PSV operator’s license. The applicant failed to prove that their main occupation was not operating PSVs, according to the 'main occupation' test under the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981.

← PreviousPage 63 · 1751 judgmentsNext →
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) case law | VadeLab