VadeLab
OtherFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Directions Issued for Tenancy Deposit Claim Under Tenant Fees Act 2019

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal issued directions in a case where a tenant is claiming the recovery of a prohibited payment or holding deposit under the Tenant Fees Act 2019. The directions outline what each party needs to submit to support their case.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to recover a prohibited payment or holding deposit under the Tenant Fees Act 2019.

Topics

tenancy depositprohibited paymentsTenant Fees Act 2019

Provisions

Tenant Fees Act 2019 s.15

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal issued directions regarding a claim under the Tenant Fees Act 2019.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal issued directions in a case involving a claim for the recovery of a prohibited payment or holding deposit under the Tenant Fees Act 2019. The directions set out the requirements for both parties to provide statements and documents relevant to the claim.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Other

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CAM/22UD/HTC/2025/0002 Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] application : For recovery of all or part of a prohibited payment or holding deposit: Tenant Fees Act 2019 Date of directions : 24 April 2025

DIRECTIONS

• Whenever you send a letter or email to the tribunal you must also send a copy to the other parties and note this on the letter or email.

• These directions are formal orders and must be complied with. The parties are referred to the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME]) Rules 2013 (“the 2013 Rules”).

• If the applicant fails to comply with these directions the tribunal may strike out all or part of its case pursuant to rule 9(3)(a) of the 2013 Rules.

• If the respondent fails to comply with these directions the tribunal may bar it from taking any further part in all or part of these proceedings and may determine all issues against it pursuant to rules 9(7) and (8) of the 2013 Rules.

• Non-compliance could also result in the tribunal making a determination on costs pursuant to Rule 13 of the 2013 Rules.

2

BACKGROUND (1) This is an application for an order for the recovery of a prohibited payment/holding deposit paid in respect of a tenancy of [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] pursuant to section 15 of the Tenant Fees Act 2019. (2) The application form and supporting documents appear to confirm that the respondent requested a total of £1392.00 from the applicant in relation to various fees concerning the tenant ending the tenancy early. (3) The tribunal does not have any jurisdiction in respect of deductions made from the tenancy deposit. (4) All or part of the remaining payment may be a prohibited payment/holding deposit within the meaning of the Tenant Fees Act 2019. If so, the tribunal would be empowered to order recovery of all or part of that amount from the respondent. (5) These directions are issued to determine whether the tribunal should make an order under section 15 of the Act for the respondent to pay all or any part of the amount to the applicant. DIRECTIONS 1. The application form and the supporting documents shall stand as the applicant’s case.

2. By 13 May 2025, the respondent must send the tribunal and the applicant a statement in reply, explaining in relation to Paragraph 6, schedule 1 of the Act whether the payments requested exceed the loss suffered as a result of the termination or whether the sum exceeds the reasonable costs and if they do why they should not have to refund some or all of the amount claimed by the applicant, together with copies of any documents to be relied upon.

3. The applicant may then send a brief reply to the tribunal and the respondent by 27 May 2025, together with copies of any other documents on which the applicant relies.

4. This case will be dealt with on the papers in the week commencing 3 June 2025 on the basis of the documents sent to the tribunal, unless either a request for an oral hearing is made in writing, by post or by email, by no later than 20 May 2025, or the tribunal considers that the case is not suitable for determination on the papers because it is unable to resolve a relevant issue without oral evidence.

5. If a hearing is requested/considered necessary, the hearing is likely to be a remote hearing by telephone conference using dial-in details which will be provided by the tribunal when the time for the remote hearing has been fixed. The parties availability will be taken onto account. The time estimate for the hearing will be up to two hours.

3 This Order has been made by a Legal Officer. Any party affected by it is entitled to ask for it to be considered afresh by a Judge, by making an application by email to the Tribunal within 14 days after the date of the Directions.

[NAME] Legal Officer

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal has the power to order the recovery of a prohibited payment or holding deposit.
  • The application and supporting documents will serve as the applicant's case.
  • The tribunal can determine if the requested payments exceed the loss suffered or reasonable costs.
  • The case may be decided based on submitted documents unless an oral hearing is requested or deemed necessary.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to issue directions for a claim under the Tenant Fees Act 2019.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court issued directions to ensure both parties have the opportunity to present their cases properly.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Tenant Fees Act 2019 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the legality of the payment or deposit under the Tenant Fees Act 2019.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was neutral, providing directions for both sides.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should follow the directions provided to ensure their claim is properly presented.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Statements and documents related to the payment or deposit are important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Procedural decisions can sometimes be appealed, but it depends on the specifics of the case.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.