Dispensation Granted for Urgent Hot Water Tank Replacement Works
📌 In brief
The tribunal allowed a landlord to bypass the usual consultation process for replacing a broken hot water tank because the work was urgent and necessary. This decision was made under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may be dispensed from consultation requirements if the works are urgent and necessary.
📖 What the law says
The appropriate tribunal can grant a request to waive consultation requirements for certain works or long-term agreements if it finds it reasonable to do so.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation for urgent hot water tank replacement works under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📜 Headnote Official document
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation for urgent hot water tank replacement works at a property in London, under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. The works were deemed necessary due to the breakdown of the old hot water tank, leaving a resident without hot water.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AY/LDC/2022/0215 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio)
P: PAPERREMOTE Property : 99[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Borough of Lambeth Representative : N/A Respondents : [redacted] [NAME] : N/A Type of [NAME] : Section 20ZA Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 – dispensation from consultation Tribunal member(s) : Judge [NAME] : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 31 January 2023
DECISION
2 The tribunal’s summary decision (1) The tribunal determines it is reasonable and appropriate to grant the applicant, dispensation from consultation pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of works to replace the hot water tank serving [NAME] at 99[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (‘[NAME]).
The [NAME]
1. This is an [NAME] made pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 seeking dispensation from the consultation provisions in respect of works to replace the hot water tank serving [NAME] as it had broken down and left one of the residents without hot water. [NAME] comprises a low-rise block of five flats of which two are long leaseholds.
2. In a statement dated 28/10/2022 supporting the [NAME] the applicant stated on 10 October 2022, the applicant was notified that the Old Elson Hot water tank at [NAME] had split and was no longer functioning. An investigation revealed the tank could not be repaired and required replacement.
3. Subsequently, works were carried out by the applicant’s contractor [COMPANY] in the sum of £4,370.21 under a long-term qualifying agreement.
4. The applicant confirmed to the tribunal the [NAME] had been notified of the [NAME] and provided with an opportunity to make any objections to it. No responses were received by any of the [NAME] or any representative either consenting or objecting to the [NAME]. The tribunal’s decision 4. In the absence of any objection to the [NAME] or any evidence of prejudice caused to the [NAME] if the [NAME] was granted, the tribunal determines that, having regard to the urgent nature of the works it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements of s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the works to replace the hot water tank at the subject Property.
3 Name: Judge Tagliavini
Date: 31 January 2023
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Roof Repairs Dispensation Without Conditi…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Urgent Asbestos Remova…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Water System Replacement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Emergency Repairs Allowed Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repair Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Lift Repairs Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal grants dispensation for urgent roof repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Lift Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Works Dispensation Without Consultation
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The hot water tank had broken down, leaving a resident without hot water, which made the works urgent.
- The leaseholders did not object to the application for dispensation.
- There was no evidence that the leaseholders would be harmed if the dispensation was granted.
- The works were necessary to replace the broken hot water tank.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant dispensation from consultation for urgent hot water tank replacement works.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the leaseholders of the property were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the landlord should be dispensed from consultation because the works were urgent and necessary.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 20ZA, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The urgency and necessity of the hot water tank replacement were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also be able to bypass the consultation process if their works are urgent and necessary.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the breakdown of the hot water tank and the need for urgent replacement was presented.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
