VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Fair Rent Determination by Rent Assessment Committee

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Rent Assessment a person decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £162.68 per month starting from April 10, 2025. This decision was based on the Retail Price Index and the previous rent registered.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation based on the Retail Price Index and previous registered rent.

Topics

fair rentrent assessment committeemaximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The fair rent for a property has been set by the Rent Assessment a person.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Rent Assessment Committee determined the fair rent for a property at £162.68 per month, effective from 10 April 2025, after considering the Retail Price Index and previous registered rent.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 Rent Assessment Panel File Ref No. MAN/30UN/F77/2024/0619

Notice of the [NAME] 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises

The [NAME] members were 34 Fernleigh, Leyland, [POSTCODE]

S Wanderer J [APPELLANT]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £ 162.68 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 10 April 2025

3. The amount for services is £ 18.68 Per month

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is £

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

Shared ownership (70% ownership). The tribunal understands that the two-storey side extension is a tenant improvement.

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £588.68 per month including £18.68 per month …………….. for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ per including £ per ……………. for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

Chairman S Wanderer Date of Decision 10-Apr-25

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE x 394

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE y 356.2

X 394 Minus y 356.2 = (A) 37.8

(A) 37.8 divided by y 356.2 = (B) 0.10612

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.15612

Last registered rent* £124.36 Multiplied by (C) = £143.78

*(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50 pence = £144.00

Variable service charge YES/NO

If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £162.68 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the [NAME]'s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

18.68

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was calculated by increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the Retail Price Index.
  • An additional 5% was added to the rent calculation because this was a second or subsequent application since February 1999.
  • The final calculated rent was rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
  • The maximum fair rent includes a variable service charge.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the fair rent for a property at £162.68 per month, effective from April 10, 2025.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used a formula based on the Retail Price Index and the previous registered rent to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the calculation method for determining the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be calculated using the same method.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The previous registered rent and the Retail Price Index figures were crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to higher courts.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.