Fair Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £850 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after considering comparable evidence and local rental values. The decision took effect from May 1, 2025.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination based on comparable evidence and local rental values.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market, taking into account the periodic nature of the tenancy and excluding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and local rental values.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £850 per month for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and local rental values, effective from May 1, 2025.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/23UB/MNR/2025/0677
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME], 15 Clarence Parade, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 850.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 May 2025
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 November 2021
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises 2-bedroom first floor flat.
[NAME] of Decision 16 June 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/23UB/MNR/2025/0677 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Ms [COUNSEL] :
None
Respondent Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : [NAME] of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Application : 21st April 2025
Date of Decision : 16th June 2025
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £850 per calendar month with effect from 1st May 2025.
SUMMARY REASONS
HAV/23UB/MNR/2025/0677
Background 1. On 28th February 2025 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £875 per month in place of the existing rent of £575 per month to take effect from 1st May 2025.
2. On 21st April 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence
4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant. There were no written submissions from the Landlord.
5. The tenancy commenced on 1st November 2021 at a rent of £575 which has not been previously increased. Determination and Valuation 6. Having given consideration to the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £900 per calendar month.
7. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings to all be provided by the Landlord.
8. In this case the property is not let in such condition or with white goods all supplied so some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary.
9. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £900 Less deductions for:- Tenants’ provision of white goods
£30 Disrepair
£20
____ TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH
£850
10. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £850 per month.
HAV/23UB/MNR/2025/0677
11. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. 12. Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of £850 per month should take effect from 1st May 2025 this being the date specified in the notice.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decis…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Increase for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Considering Property Condition and Local I…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined the open market rent for the property in good condition was £900 per month.
- The tenant's provision of white goods reduced the total rent payable.
- The new rent was set to take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed new rent of £875 per month was not accepted by the tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision determined a fair rent of £850 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The case involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable evidence and local rental values, ensuring a fair rent determination.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of rental values in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect a fair rent determination based on comparable evidence and local rental values.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable evidence and local rental values were important in making the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
