VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent of £850 per month for an assured periodic tenancy based on current market conditions in the area. This decision took effect from 1st August 2025.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on current market conditions in the area.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a new rent based on what a willing landlord might reasonably expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The new rent applies to a periodic tenancy with the same periods as the original tenancy, starting at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £850 per month for an assured periodic tenancy based on current market conditions in the area. The decision took effect from 1st August 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/29UL/MNR/2025/0723

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] [NAME] & Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr & [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 850.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 August 2025

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced December 2018

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

8. Description of premises One bedroom first floor flat

[NAME] of Decision 12 September 2025

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/29UL/MNR/2025/0723 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] & [NAME] [COUNSEL] [NAME] :

None

Respondent Landlords : [NAME] [COUNSEL] & Mr [COUNSEL] : Legal for Lettings Type of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Application : 24th June 2025 Date of Decision : 12th September 2025

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £850 per calendar month with effect from 1st August 2025.

HAV/29UL/MNR/2025/0723

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 17th June 2025 the Landlords’ Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £925 per month in place of the existing rent of £775 per month to take effect from 1st August 2025.

2. On 24th June 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenants referred the Landlords’ notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

4. The Tribunal has considered the Application Form provided by the Tenant. There were no further written submissions from either party. Determination and Valuation 5. Having given consideration to the evidence provided and its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £850 per calendar month.

6. In the absence of any representations from either party the Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £850 per month.

7. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.

8.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of £850 per month should take effect from 1st August 2025, this being the date specified in the notice.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its expert knowledge of local rental values to determine the market rent.
  • The Tribunal considered the tenant's application form when making its decision.
  • The Tribunal determined the open market rent for the property in good condition to be £850 per month.
  • The new rent takes effect from August 1, 2025, as specified in the landlord's notice.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's proposed new rent of £925 per month was not accepted by the Tribunal.
  • The tenant did not claim that the new rent's start date would cause them hardship.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £850 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in this case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on current market conditions in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the current market conditions for rents in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a rent determination based on current market conditions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents provided by both parties were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed within a month of the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.