Fair Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under an assured shorthold tenancy, taking into account various issues raised by the tenant and comparing the rent with similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent under an assured shorthold tenancy as determined by the appropriate tribunal under the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant under an assured shorthold tenancy can apply to an appropriate tribunal for a determination of a fair rent. However, the application cannot be made if the rent was previously determined under this section, if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy, or if the tenancy falls under certain conditions specified in section 20(4) of the Act.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property based on the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property based on the Housing Act 1988, considering various factors including disrepair issues and comparable rents in the locality.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AN/MDR/2021/0018
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 130 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] MA LLM FRICS
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 6, 160 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1863.33 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 21st July 2021
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable Nil Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 21st July 2021
6. Length of the term or rental period 3 years
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
8. Furniture provided by landlord or [NAME]
9. Description of premises Ground floor flat within a converted house , one bedroom , one further room used as a study, a kitchen and a bathroom. Centrally heated
[NAME] MA LLM FRICS Date of Decision 12th November 2021
___________________________________________________________________
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AN/MDR/2021/0018 Property : 130 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] : In person Type of [NAME] : Market Rent under s22 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) : Mr [NAME] MA LLM FRICS Date and venue of hearing : 12th November 2021 Remote Hearing on Papers Date of decision : 12th November 2021
DECISION
Background 1. On the 31st August the Tribunal received from the Tenant of the above property made an [NAME] under section 22(1) of the Housing Act 1988.
2. The tenancy commenced on 21st July 2021 with a contractual period of three years at a rent of £1863.33 per month.
3. The Tribunal were provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement with the [NAME].
4. On the 9th September 2021 the Tribunal made Directions informing the parties that in view of the Government’s advice with respect to Covid 19 outbreak an inspection would not take place. The parties were given the opportunity to provide supporting photographs or other material of the property and if desired make representations.
5. The Directions required the Tenant to send a reply form to the Tribunal with a copy to the landlord. The landlord was also required to send a completed reply form to the tenant with copy to the Tribunal. The Tenant had the opportunity to comment on the landlords reply form copied to the Landlord and the Tribunal.
6. Neither party requested a hearing.
7. The Tribunal met on 12th November 2021 to consider the [NAME]. The Property 8. The property is an apartment located within the ground floor of a house converted to flats. It comprises; one living room, one bedroom , one room used as a study, a kitchen and bathroom in London W12. The property is centrally heated , and with white goods supplied.
9. The Evidence Appellants Evidence 10. In support of the Applicants case, they rely on the [NAME] form ,a copy of the tenancy agreement and further submissions. An additional document was received by e mail on 7th November 2021.The e mail had been copied to the Landlord.
11. The Tribunal has reviewed and noted the contents of these documents.
12. The [NAME] form at 8 (b) identifies several issues namely;
13. Sound from the flat above, the tenant considers this to be caused by an absence of insulation between the flats.
14. The flat has its original floorboards and these allow draughts.
15. The flat experiences unpleasant odours.
16. The heating is not working and there is inadequate lighting in the property.
17. There is a hole beneath the kitchen sink allowing rodents in.
18. Privacy is an issue with those using the garden 19. Inadequate ventilation in the bathroom 20. There is dampness in some walls and cracks in them 21. The electrical box is noted as last checked in 2015 22. There are issues around maintenance of the garden 23. Further submissions were received by way of e mail 1st November 2021, which expanded on the issues of rodent and boiler disrepair.
24. The Tenants Reply form undated considered the alleged disrepair each room in the property. The issues include lack of light, smell, the presence of the original floor boards, rodents, privacy concerns and cold.
25. The Tenant complains they cannot use their patio as it is partially obstructed by a neighbours bin.
26. In the disrepair section of the Reply form the Tenant lists a number of further issues.
27. There is a report by damp specialists [COMPANY] dated 1st October 2021. The report identifies one wall and part of a return wall as exhibiting damp.
28. There is a document dated 15th October 2021 submitted by the Tenant detailing the size of the property and noting the second bedroom falls below the minimum size under the Housing Act 1985.
29. The Tenant also includes a quotation from a flooring company, Flooring First, for the fitting of additional flooring through the flat.
30. There is a further document comprising 82 pages, titled “The 1 bedroom flat at [ADDRESS]” 31. In additional to the physical issues noted in the document there is submission relating to rental levels. Part of the submission relates to Fair Rent Register the rents contained therein are not market rents. A number of comparables from the open market are included.
32. The e mail of the 7th November 2021, focusing on the issues raised of relevance to the determination, it includes a number of comparable properties in the vicinity. Additionally, the Tenant alleges continuing poor performance of the boiler and deterioration of the bathroom wall.
33. The Respondents Case 34. The respondent relies on a completed “reply form” and a number of comparables within the locality. The respondent notes the that [NAME] attended the property and confirmed it was safe and no outstanding issues. Additionally, Dyno Rod also attended and confirmed no issues with drainage.
35. The Landlords submission shows photographs of the property from the sales particulars when the Landlord purchased it in 2021.
36. There is an email dated 10th October from [NAME] [NAME] , the previous tenants who noted the flat was fit for purpose, and there were no issues with rodents or The e mail noted some of the floor boards were lose and lack of ventilation on bathroom caused minor dampness which was managed through cleaning.
37. An additional document was received by e mail dated 7th November 2021. This was also copied to the Tenant. The document was the report on condition of the property carried out by [NAME]. Present during the inspect were [NAME] a London Borough of [NAME], Mr [COUNSEL] a representative of the owner [NAME] [COUNSEL], Mr [COUNSEL] and a colleagues from [NAME] the letting agents , [NAME] [APPELLANT] the tenant and a friend.
38. The report notes there were no items of disrepair requiring formal action to be taken.
39. A number of non-actionable items of disrepair were noted. These comprised; 40. adjust sash window weights in ground floor front bedroom sash window 41. same issue in ground floor rear room
42. replace perished sealant in kitchen, and sand down discoursed timber areas and reseal 43. security lock to front door needs adjusting 44. privacy to bathroom can be improved through fitting of blind by tenant 45. the bare floorboards were sound, no odours detected 46. the boiler has a current gas safety certificate 47. vermin considered to enter through open doors or windows, recommended to not leave open 48. ground floor back addition has crack in wall plaster that can be addressed through redecoration 49. no evidence of dampness or mould, but recommendation to install a mechanical ventilation in bathroom. 50. the noise issue from the flat above is outside their remit. The Law 51. In accordance with the terms of section 22 of the Housing Act 1988 ( The Act) the tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured shorthold tenancy exclusive of water rates and/or council tax.
52. The tribunal cites the relevant section below: 22 Reference of excessive rents to appropriate tribunal. (1) Subject to section 23 and subsection (2) below, the tenant under an assured shorthold tenancy may make an [NAME] in the prescribed form to the appropriate tribunal for a determination of the rent which, in the appropriate tribunal’s opinion, the landlord might reasonably be expected to obtain under the assured shorthold tenancy. (2) No [NAME] may be made under this section if— (a)the rent payable under the tenancy is a rent previously determined under this section;
(aa)the tenancy is one to which section 19A above applies and more than six months have elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy or, in the case of a replacement tenancy, since the beginning of the original tenancy; or (b)the tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy falling within subsection (4) of section 20 above (and, accordingly, is one in respect of which notice need not have been served as mentioned in subsection (2) of that section). (3)Where an [NAME] is made to the appropriate tribunal under subsection (1) above with respect to the rent under an assured shorthold tenancy, the appropriate tribunal shall not make such a determination as is referred to in that subsection unless they consider— (a)that there is a sufficient number of similar dwelling-houses in the locality let on assured tenancies (whether shorthold or not); and (b)that the rent payable under the assured shorthold tenancy in question is significantly higher than the rent which the landlord might reasonably be expected to be able to obtain under the tenancy, having regard to the level of rents payable under the tenancies referred to in paragraph (a) above. (4)Where, on an [NAME] under this section, the appropriate tribunal make a determination of a rent for an assured shorthold tenancy— (a)the determination shall have effect from such date as the appropriate tribunal may direct, not being earlier than the date of the [NAME]; (b)if, at any time on or after the determination takes effect, the rent which, apart from this paragraph, would be payable under the tenancy exceeds the rent so determined, the excess shall be irrecoverable from the tenant; and (c)no notice may be served under section 13(2) above with respect to a tenancy of the dwelling-house in question until after the first anniversary of the date on which the determination takes effect. (5) Subsections (4), (5) and (8) of section 14 above apply in relation to a determination of rent under this section as they apply in relation to a determination under that section and, accordingly, where subsection (5) of that section applies, any reference in subsection (4)(b) above to rent is a reference to rent exclusive of the amount attributable to rates.
53. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1) ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant’s improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.
Consideration 54. The first consideration to be addressed by the Tribunal was Section 22(3)(a) of the Act. The tribunal must find there to be a sufficient number of similar dwelling houses in the locality. Law does not define “sufficient”. Similarly, there is no definition of “similar” or “locality” , but there is considerable case law to give the tribunal guidance.
55. The second consideration to be considered is whether the rent is “ considerably higher than the rent which the landlord might reasonably be expected to be able to obtain under the tenancy, having regard to the level of rents payable under the tenancies in the locality”.
56. The Tribunal using the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunals own expertise.
57. The Decision 58. The Tribunal is satisfied that there are sufficient similar properties in the locality to make a determination. It is clear from the extensive submissions that relations have broken down between the Landlord and the Tenant. The Landlord has offered to accept the surrender of the tenancy, but this offer has not been accepted.
59. Properties of this nature and age will by their nature be prone to many of the issues identified in the submissions. Noise both internally and externally of the building is an inherent part of the physical fabric of the locality. Comparables properties will have these features implicitly within them and reflected in their rental levels.
60. The presence of rodents within the fabric of the building and accessing the flat is distressing. Whilst not unusual within older buildings, properties of a lettable standard would expect to have work undertaken to prevent this. The report by [NAME] did not identify any internal cause of rodents access but took the view their access was from open windows or doors. The photographic evidence submitted by the Tenant shows their presence particularly within the kitchen cupboard. Periodic presence of vermin within converted buildings within urban areas is not unusual. Clearly the issue requires proactive management , but in itself it is not of an extent that could not be anticipated.
61. The issues with heating in particular the boiler, are expected within rental properties and proved they are repaired in a reasonable time and safe. The evidence in this case shows the matter can be resolved in reasonable time provided access is afforded.
62. The evidence of damp is mixed. The [NAME] report does not find any, the report by the [COMPANY] notes a small area of
damp. There is also no mechanical ventilation in the bathroom. Again, these issues are of a minor nature, and are present in many other properties in the market and so many comparable properties may have these detractions.
63. The property contains more rooms than a traditional one-bedroom flat but the second room is limited in size. The property does however use of an outside garden space, which is generally considered attractive feature which attracts an increased rental bid. 64. [NAME] what it can of the comparable evidence and its own knowledge the tribunal determines that £ 1863.33 per month is not significantly higher than the rent which the landlord might reasonably be expected to be able to obtain under the tenancy so remains the rent payable.
R. Waterhouse
Name: Tribunal Judge Waterhouse Date: 12th November 2021
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
THE LEGISLATION Housing Act 1988 s.13.— Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies. (1) This section applies to— (a) a statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and (b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period. (2) For the purpose of securing an increase in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice, being a period beginning not earlier than— (a) the minimum period after the date of the service of the notice; and (b) except in the case of a statutory periodic [tenancy—] [ (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; (ii) in any other case, on the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; and ] (c) if the rent under the tenancy has previously been increased by virtue of a notice under this subsection or a determination under section 14[below—] [ (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the increased rent took effect; (ii) in any other case, the appropriate date. ] (3) The minimum period referred to in subsection (2) above is— (a) in the case of a yearly tenancy, six months; (b) in the case of a tenancy where the period is less than a month, one month; and (c) in any other case, a period equal to the period of the tenancy. [ (3A) The appropriate date referred to in subsection (2)(c)(ii) above is— (a) in a case to which subsection (3B) below applies, the date that falls 53 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect; (b) in any other case, the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect. (3B) This subsection applies where— (a) the rent under the tenancy has been increased by virtue of a notice under this section or a determination under section 14 below on at least one occasion after the coming into force of the Regulatory Reform (Assured Periodic Tenancies) (Rent Increases) Order 2003; and
(b) the fifty-third week after the date on which the last such increase took effect begins more than six days before the anniversary of the date on which the first such increase took effect. ] (4) Where a notice is served under subsection (2) above, a new rent specified in the notice shall take effect as mentioned in the notice unless, before the beginning of the new period specified in the notice,— (a) the tenant by an [NAME] in the prescribed form refers the notice to [the appropriate tribunal] ; or (b) the landlord and the tenant agree on a variation of the rent which is different from that proposed in the notice or agree that the rent should not be varied. (5) Nothing in this section (or in section 14 below) affects the right of the landlord and the tenant under an assured tenancy to vary by agreement any term of the tenancy (including a term relating to rent).
s.14.— Determination of rent by [tribunal] . (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to [the appropriate tribunal] a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the [appropriate tribunal]3 shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the [appropriate tribunal]3 consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and
(b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. [ (3A) In [NAME] a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a [NAME] is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, the [appropriate tribunal] shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority— (a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and (b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded. (3B) In subsection (3A) above— (a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, (b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and (c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act. (4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 , but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture [, in respect of council tax] or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements. (5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a [NAME], the [appropriate tribunal] shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne. (6) In any case where— (a) [the appropriate tribunal] have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and (b) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and (c) the [appropriate tribunal]9 propose to hear the two references together, the [appropriate tribunal] shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before [NAME] their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection (1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference. (7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to [the appropriate tribunal] , then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by [the appropriate tribunal] (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the
tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to [the appropriate tribunal] that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the [NAME] may direct. (8) Nothing in this section requires [the appropriate tribunal] to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end. (9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: What You Need to Know
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Secures Lower Rent After Proving Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced Due to Property's Insulation Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for London Studio Flat at £202.29 Weekly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property has significant insulation and ventilation issues.
- The property is in disrepair.
- The rent is determined based on the open market value of the property.
- The rent is adjusted for the condition of the property.
- The tribunal sets the rent according to the Housing Act 1988.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The current rent is not significantly higher than what a willing landlord could obtain for a similar property in the area.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property under an assured shorthold tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, considering the conditions of the property and comparable rents in the locality.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied, specifically section 22.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's conditions and rent with similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent for the property.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should bring forward any disrepair issues and provide comparisons with similar properties to argue for a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence such as photos, reports, and comparable rent data were important in the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
