VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Fair Rent Determination for Property Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £132.96 per week. The decision was based on the Rent Act 1977 and took into account factors like the property's condition and market value.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Retail Price Index.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977Retail Price Index

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £132.96 per week for a property, considering the Rent Act 1977 and the Retail Price Index. The decision was made after an inspection and review of the property's condition and market value.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BJ/F77/2025/0282

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 104 Clapham Common North Side, London [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Ms [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [APPELLANT] c/o [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £132.96 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 29 January 2026

3. The amount for services is

Per

None

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

None

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

The property was fully furnished at the commencement of the tenancy in 1978.

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £134.50 per week.

(b) .

[NAME] of decision 29 January 2026

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 405.6

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 376.4

X 405.6 Minus Y 376.4 = (A) 29.2

(A) 29.2 Divided by Y 376.4 = (B) 0.07

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 - NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) N/A

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.12

Last registered rent* 120 Multiplied by (C) = 134.40 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 134.50

Variable service charge No If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = 134.50 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: LON/00BJ/F77/2025/0282

Property : 104 Clapham Common Noth Side, London [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [COMPANY] c/o [APPELLANT] of Tenant’s Objection : 24 August 2025

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 29 January 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £132.96 per calendar week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 29 January 2026, being the date, the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

2. The parties did not request a hearing, but an inspection was requested in order to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. The Tribunal considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties, the inspection and the Rent Officer’s calculations.

Evidence

3. The Tribunal received completed a completed Reply Statement from the Tenant and no evidence from the landlord. The Tribunal had before it, the Rent Officers two Registrations and calculations for the most recent registration on the 14 August 2025 to take effect on the 18 September 2025.

The Inspection

4. The Tribunal inspected the property following the hearing on the afternoon of 29 January 2026 in the presence of the tenant. The property is a converted first floor studio flat which forms part of a three storey Victorian building The property is located in an established residential area close to local amenities and station.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of the Landlords evidence and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Clapham area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £277 per week. (approximately £1,200 per month) From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

Terms of tenancy agreement, no white goods, no carpets or curtains, no central heating, small floor area, kitchen cupboard with very limited work surfaces and storage, and dated sanitary fittings, rot to single glazed sash windows. This equates to approximately 40%

6. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity at 20%

7. The full valuation is shown below:

3 Market Rent £277 pw

Less

approx. 40% £110.80

£166.20

Less Scarcity

approx. 20%

£33.24

£132.96 pw

Decision

8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £132.96 per calendar week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £134.50 per calendar week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.

9. In this case therefore the lower rent of £132.96 per calendar week is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.

Chairman: [NAME]: 29 January 2026

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation based on the condition of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation that reflects market conditions.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent capped at the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation that adjusts for improvements made by the tenant.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation based on the Retail Price Index.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £132.96 per week for a property.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Retail Price Index, considering the property's condition and market value.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the calculation of the fair rent based on the property's condition and market value.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the same criteria.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included the property's condition, market value, and the calculation of the fair rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.