VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Tenant Improvements

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the fair rent for a tenant's improvements and property condition, setting a new rent of £732 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on improvements and property condition.

Topics

fair renttenant improvementsrent adjustment

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the fair rent after considering improvements made by the tenant and the condition of the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the fair rent for a tenant's improvements and property condition, setting a new rent of £732 per month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference

: BIR/OOCT/F77/2025/0001

Property : [ADDRESS] Birmingham

Tenant

: [NAME] [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 10th January 2025

Type of Application : Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mrs [NAME] of Decision : 2nd July 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £732.00 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 2nd July 2025 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection

2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.

Evidence

3. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. From the information provided it appears that the subject property is a semi- detached house comprising one living room and kitchen on the ground floor. On the first floor the landing leads to three bedrooms and bathroom with WC. Outside is a garden with stores, WC and car parking space.

4. The Tenants submit that they have carried out substantial improvement works to the property including extending and refitting the kitchen, refitting the bathroom, fitting a new UPVC double glazed patio door and window, fitting new internal doors, fitting loft and cavity wall insulation, fitting new soffits, gutters and downpipes, providing new fencing and a new gate, fitting full central heating, installing an alarm system and a new gas fire with hearth. In respect of the property condition the roof requires overhauling and the driveway is uneven.

5. The Landlord submits that they installed a new boiler in 2023 which they maintain. The Landlord also submitted various comparable properties with market rents between £1,300.00-£1,450.00 per calendar month.

Determination and Valuation

7. On consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties, that forwarded by the Rent Officer and the Tribunal’s own expert knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the open market rent for the property in a satisfactory condition would be in the region of £1,400.00 per month. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:

a) Condition b) Improvements made by the Tenant c) Curtains, carpets and white goods fitted by the Tenant. d) The Tenant’s liability to redecorate.

3 8. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity using their own general

knowledge and experience. The Tribunal considers that in the wider geographical

area there is an imbalance of supply and demand impacting on rental values and has, therefore, made a reduction of 20% for scarcity.

9. The full valuation is shown below:

Market Rent

£1,400.00 per month

Less a) Items given under a) above

£10.00

b) Items given under b) above

£340.00 c) Items given under c) above

£65.00

d) Tenant’s internal decoration liability @ 5% £70.00

Less Scarcity @ 20%

£183.00

£668.00 £668.00

Say

£732.00

10. The Tribunal determines an uncapped rent of 732.00 month.

Decision

11. The uncapped fair rent determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, is therefore £732.00 per month from 2nd July 2025. The maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is £771.50 per month. This therefore has no impact on the rent determined by the Tribunal. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.

Chairman: [NAME]: 2nd July 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

4 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.

BIR/

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 7 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £732.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 2nd July 2025

3. The amount for services is Nil Per -

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Nil Per -

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £771.50 permitted by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 2nd July 2025

5 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 402.9

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 360.3

X 402.9 Minus Y 360.3 = (A) 42.6

(A) 42.6 Divided by Y 360.3 = (B) 0.1182

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1682

Last registered rent* 660.00 Multiplied by (C) = 771.01 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £771.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £771.50 Per Month Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal adjusted the market rent downwards due to the property's condition.
  • The Tribunal reduced the rent because the tenant had made improvements to the property.
  • The Tribunal accounted for the tenant's provision of curtains, carpets, and white goods by adjusting the rent.
  • The tenant's responsibility for internal redecoration led to a 5% reduction in the market rent.
  • The Tribunal applied a 20% reduction to the rent due to scarcity in the wider geographical area.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal adjusted the fair rent to £732 per month based on the tenant's improvements and the property condition.

Who was involved?

The tenant made improvements to the property, and the landlord objected to the rent set by the Rent Officer.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to adjust the fair rent downwards due to the tenant's improvements and the property condition.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's argument that improvements should lower the rent was accepted by the court.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation could potentially negotiate a lower rent based on improvements made to the property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both the tenant and the landlord were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent adjustments.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.