First-tier Tribunal Allows Lease Variation for Non-Residential Scheme Manager
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to vary the leases at the address to replace a residential scheme manager with a non-residential one, as 96.77% of a person agreed to the change.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may vary a lease to replace a residential scheme manager with a non-residential one if a sufficient majority of a person consent.
📖 What the law says
An application can be made to a tribunal to vary leases if a majority of the parties involved consent. For applications involving more than eight leases, the application is valid if it is not opposed by more than 10% of the parties and at least 75% of those opposing parties consent to it.
If the grounds for an application under section 37 are proven satisfactory to the tribunal, the tribunal can make an order to vary the leases as specified in the application. However, the tribunal will not make an order if the variation would substantially prejudice a respondent or a non-party without providing adequate compensation, or if it would be unreasonable to make the variation.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The First-tier Tribunal varied the residential long leases at the address to replace a residential scheme manager with a non-residential one.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal varied the residential long leases at Malvern Court to replace a residential scheme manager with a non-residential one, given that 96.77% of leaseholders consented to the variation.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference
: BIR/00CT/LVT/2020/0005
HMCTS
: Paper
Property
: [ADDRESS] 915/917 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant
: [redacted]
: [COUNSEL] LLP
Respondents
: [redacted] : 22nd July 2020
Type of [NAME] : To vary a lease or leases pursuant to s37 Landlord and Tenant Act 1987
Tribunal
: Judge [NAME] of Decision : 8th December 2020
____________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 Covid-19 Pandemic
This determination on the papers has been consented to by the parties. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no-one requested the same, and all issues could be determined on paper. The documents referred to are in a bundle, the contents of which are noted.
Pursuant to Rule 33(2A) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 in accordance with the Pilot Practice Direction: Contingency Arrangements in the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal the Tribunal has directed that the case is to be determined wholly on the papers because it is not reasonably practicable for a hearing, or to be accessed in a court or tribunal venue by persons who are not parties entitled to participate in the hearing; a media representative is not able to access the proceedings remotely while they are taking place; and such a direction is necessary to secure the proper administration of justice.
Decision
1. The Tribunal orders that pursuant to section 38 of the 1987 Act all the residential long leases at [NAME] are varied as set out in the Order annexed hereto with effect from the date of the Order.
Reasons
The [NAME]
2. The Applicant seeks a variation of the Leases of 30 flats at [ADDRESS] (“[NAME]”), which is retirement housing, under section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (“the 1987 Act”). The Variation is to allow the replacement of a residential scheme manager with a non-residential scheme manager. 29 out of the 30 [NAME] consent to the [NAME] which is in excess of the 75% required under section 37 of the 1987 Act. There is only one [NAME] who opposes the [NAME] which is less than the figure of 10% prescribed in section 37.
3. Directions were issued on 28th July 2020 which required the Applicant to send a copy of the [NAME] and Schedule of the Proposed Variations and the Direction to all 30 [NAME] and to any persons it knows or believes are likely to be affected by the proposed variation of the Lease informing such persons that they may apply to the Tribunal to be joined as a party. On 10th August 2020 the Applicant confirmed that the Directions had been complied with.
4. The Tribunal received a Statement of Case and Schedule of the Proposed Variations in compliance with the Directions from the Applicant. No statement of case or representations were received from the Respondents.
5. The [NAME] was set down for determination on or after 30th October 2020. On 2nd October 2020 the Tribunal asked for some further information which was provided on 13th October 2020 as requested.
3
The Leases
6. A copy of a Lease was provided. It was stated that all the Leases were for a term of 99 years from 29th September 1985 and are in like form although have different commencement dates. The Lease provided was dated 7th July 1986 and was between (1) [COMPANY] (the Landlord) (2) a [NAME] (name redacted) (the Tenant) for a Flat (number redacted) let for a term of 99 years from 29th September 1985. The Lease was subsequently assigned to the Applicant as Landlord.
7. The relevant terms of the Lease are as follows (the words to be varied are underlined)
8. Clause 1:4
Specified Percentage 2.86% (for one-bedroom flats) Or “Specified Percentage 3.43% (for two-bedroom flats)
9. Clause 1:13
“[NAME]” that part (the position and extent whereof is shown edged brown on Plan 1 being on the ground floor) of the Buildings on and over the development
10. Clause 1:14
“Common Parts” all parts of the Development (other than those comprised in the Leases and excluding the [NAME])
11. Paragraph 1 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
SUBJECT to the provision of paragraph 8 of the Sixth Schedule: -
1. To use its best endeavours to maintain the services of a resident [NAME] for the performance within the Development of the following duties:
(a) responding to the [NAME] call system link between [NAME] and the [NAME] during normal hours
12. Paragraph 2 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
To keep in a good state of repair and condition and when necessary replace rebuild and reinstate the [NAME]
13. Paragraph 3 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
4 To keep the roof foundations and external parts(including external walls and loadbearing walls and external door and windows (save the glass in any Flat doors and windows) of [NAME] in good and substantial repair and to paint or otherwise treat (as may be appropriate) as often as may be reasonably necessary in a proper an workmanlike manner and with a suitable materials of good quality such external parts of [NAME] and all other Buildings comprised in the Development and all internal and external parts of the [NAME] as are usually painted or otherwise treated
14. Paragraph 9:1 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
To keep the Development (including the [NAME]) and [NAME] insured at all times from loss or damage by dire flood and such other risks and perils as the Association shall from time to time determine in sum equal to the full rebuilding costs (including the removal of debris) for the time being together with an adequate sum I respect of architect’s and surveyor’s fees and in the event that [NAME] shall be destroyed or damaged as aforesaid to lay out such moneys towards the reinstatement and rebuilding of the same subject nevertheless to the proviso contained in paragraph 6 of the Third Schedule
15. Paragraph 6 of Part II of the Fifth Schedule (Expenditure to be recovered by means of the Maintenance Charge)
All sums paid by the Association in and about the repair maintenance decoration cleaning lighting and running of the buildings the Common Parts and the [NAME] and the Development whether or not the Association was liable to incur the same under its covenants herein contained
The Proposed Variation
16. The proposed variation applicable to all the long leases is as follows (“the Proposed Variation”)
17. Clause 1:4
Specified Percentage 2.77% (for one-bedroom flats) Or Specified Percentage 3.32% (for two-bedroom flats)
18. Clause 1:13
To be deleted from the Lease
19. Clause 1:14
“Common Parts” all parts of the Development (other than those comprised in the Leases)
5 20. Paragraph 1 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
1. To use its best endeavours to maintain the services of a [NAME] for the performance within the Development of the following duties:
(a) responding to calls from the helpline service during normal working hours
21. Paragraph 2 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
To be deleted from the Lease
22. Paragraph 3 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provision of services)
To keep the roof foundations and external parts (including external walls and loadbearing walls and external door and windows (save the glass in any Flat doors and windows) of [NAME] in good and substantial repair and to paint or otherwise treat (as may be appropriate) as often as may be reasonably necessary in a proper and workmanlike manner and with suitable materials of good quality such external parts of [NAME] and all other Buildings comprised in the Development
23. Paragraph 9:1 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
To keep the Development and [NAME] insured at all times from loss or damage by dire flood and such other risks and perils as the Association shall from time to time determine in sum equal to the full rebuilding costs (including the removal of debris) for the time being together with an adequate sum in respect of architect’s and surveyor’s fees and in the event that [NAME] shall be destroyed or damaged as aforesaid to lay out such moneys towards the reinstatement and rebuilding of the same subject nevertheless to the proviso contained in paragraph 6 of the Third Schedule
24. Paragraph 6 of Part II of the Fifth Schedule (Expenditure to be recovered by means of the Maintenance Charge)
All sums paid by the Association in and about the repair maintenance decoration cleaning lighting and running of the buildings the Common Parts and the Development whether or not the Association was liable to incur the same under its covenants herein contained
Submissions
25. The Applicant provided grounds for the claim on the [NAME] and Statement of Case which is précised and paraphrased as follows.
6
26. The Applicant had consulted with its [NAME] at [ADDRESS] in relation to replacing the residential scheme manager with a non-residential scheme manager with a view to saving costs which are ultimately recovered from the [NAME] by way of their service charge. The [NAME] voted in favour of a non -residential scheme manager.
27. The Applicant said that it was satisfied that there is a sufficient majority for an [NAME] under section 37 of the 1987 Act. All 30 [NAME] had been consulted in relation to the proposed variation and 30 responses had been received. Of the responses 29 [NAME] voted that they have a preference for a non-residential scheme manager. The Applicant, as landlord, also has a vote and has a preference for a non-residential scheme manager. There are 96.77% in favour of the Proposed Variation which is over and beyond the required 75% of the [NAME]’ consent needed to make an [NAME] under section 37 of the 1987 Act.
28. A copy of the [NAME] and Directions, dated 28th July 2020, was sent to all [NAME] on 7th August 2020. The [NAME] contains a draft of the Proposed Variations to effect the change from residential scheme manager to a non-residential scheme manager. The Applicant confirmed that no response had been received in opposition to the [NAME].
29. In response to the Tribunal’s questions the Applicant was able to confirm the following information.
1. There are 5 one-bedroom flats and 25 two-bedroom flats (not including the [NAME]).
2. The pre-variation Service Charge apportionment referred to in the Lease as the Specified Percentage is: 2.86% for one-bedroom flats; and 3.43% for two-bedroom flats. The post-variation Service Charge apportionment or Specified Percentage is: 2.77% for one-bedroom flats; and 3.32% for two-bedroom flats.
3. The Applicant confirmed that the [NAME] will be let as a two bedroom flat in like manner as the other flats, thus increasing the number of flats and thereby reducing the service charge apportionment percentage post variation.
4. The premium paid for the long lease of the [NAME] will not be paid into the reserve fund, but [NAME] will benefit from the reduced service charge and the cost of the non-residential scheme manager will be less than a residential scheme manager so in turn this will further reduce the Service Charge costs. These benefits were discussed with residents when the ballot was undertaken.
7 Decision
30. The Tribunal considered all the evidence adduced.
31. In [NAME] its determination the Tribunal took into account the reasons for effecting the change from residential scheme manager to a non-residential scheme manager. It found that the letting of the [NAME] would result in a modest reduction in the Specified Percentage paid by the [NAME] towards the Service Charge. It also found that the employment of a non-residential scheme manager would reduce the Service Charge costs incurred. It further found that the [NAME] had received all the relevant information regarding the variation and these proceedings and that no objections had been received.
32. The Tribunal is satisfied that the conditions as set out in Section 37(5) of the 1987 Act for varying the Leases are met. It is also satisfied that pursuant to section 37(3) the [NAME] to effect the change from residential scheme manager to a non-residential scheme manager cannot be satisfactorily achieved unless all the leases are varied to the same effect.
33. The Tribunal found that the reduction in the Service Charge in terms of both the Specified Percentage and the costs incurred would benefit all the [NAME] in equal measure. The Tribunal had regard to section 38(6) and was satisfied that the variation would not be likely to substantially prejudice (i) any respondent to the [NAME], or (ii) any person who is not a party to the [NAME]. The Tribunal also had regard to section 38(10) and determined that no loss or disadvantage had been suffered by a party as a result of the variation to justify an order for compensation.
34. Therefore, the Tribunal orders that pursuant to section 38 of the 1987 Act all the residential long leases at [NAME] are varied in accordance with the Proposed Variation as set out in the Order annexed hereto with effect from the date of the Order.
Judge JR Morris
8 APPENDIX 1 - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. If a party wishes to appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
9 APPENDIX 2 – THE LAW
The Law
The relevant law is contained in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 sections 37 and 38.
37. [NAME] by majority of parties for variation of leases.
(1) Subject to the following provisions of this section, an [NAME] may be made to the appropriate tribunal in respect of two or more leases for an order varying each of those leases in such manner as is specified in the [NAME].
(2) Those leases must be long leases of flats under which the landlord is the same person, but they need not be leases of flats which are in the same building, nor leases which are drafted in identical terms.
(3) The grounds on which an [NAME] may be made under this section are that the object to be achieved by the variation cannot be satisfactorily achieved unless all the leases are varied to the same effect.
(4) An [NAME] under this section in respect of any leases may be made by the landlord or any of the tenants under the leases.
(5) Any such [NAME] shall only be made if— (a) in a case where the [NAME] is in respect of less than nine leases, all, or all but one, of the parties concerned consent to it; or (b) in a case where the [NAME] is in respect of more than eight leases, it is not opposed for any reason by more than 10 per cent. of the total number of the parties concerned and at least 75 per cent. of that number consent to it.
(6) For the purposes of subsection (5)— (a) in the case of each lease in respect of which the [NAME] is made, the tenant under the lease shall constitute one of the parties concerned (so that in determining the total number of the parties concerned a person who is the tenant under a number of such leases shall be regarded as constituting a corresponding number of the parties concerned); and (b) the landlord shall also constitute one of the parties concerned.
38.— Orders varying leases.
(1) If, on an [NAME] under section 35, the grounds on which the [NAME] was made are established to the satisfaction of the tribunal, the tribunal may (subject to subsections (6) and (7)) make an order varying the lease specified in the [NAME] in such manner as is specified in the order.
(2) If— (a) an [NAME] under section 36 was made in connection with that [NAME], and
10 (b) the grounds set out in subsection (3) of that section are established to the satisfaction of the tribunal with respect to the leases specified in the [NAME] under section 36,
the tribunal may (subject to subsections (6) and (7)) also make an order varying each of those leases in such manner as is specified in the order.
(3) If, on an [NAME] under section 37, the grounds set out in subsection (3) of that section are established to the satisfaction of the tribunal with respect to the leases specified in the [NAME], the tribunal may (subject to subsections (6) and (7)) make an order varying each of those leases in such manner as is specified in the order.
(4) The variation specified in an order under subsection (1) or (2) may be either the variation specified in the relevant [NAME] under section 35 or 36 or such other variation as the tribunal thinks fit.
(5) If the grounds referred to in subsection (2) or (3) (as the case may be) are established to the satisfaction of the tribunal with respect to some but not all of the leases specified in the [NAME], the power to make an order under that subsection shall extend to those leases only.
(6) A tribunal shall not make an order under this section effecting any variation of a lease if it appears to the tribunal —
(a) that the variation would be likely substantially to prejudice— (i) any respondent to the [NAME], or (ii) any person who is not a party to the [NAME],
and that an award under subsection (10) would not afford him adequate compensation, or
(b) that for any other reason it would not be reasonable in the circumstances for the variation to be effected.
(7) A tribunal shall not, on an [NAME] relating to the provision to be made by a lease with respect to insurance, make an order under this section effecting any variation of the lease—
(a) which terminates any existing right of the landlord under its terms to nominate an insurer for insurance purposes; or
(b) which requires the landlord to nominate a number of insurers from which the tenant would be entitled to select an insurer for those purposes; or
(c) which, in a case where the lease requires the tenant to effect insurance with a specified insurer, requires the tenant to effect insurance otherwise than with another specified insurer.
(8) A tribunal may, instead of [NAME] an order varying a lease in such manner as is specified in the order, make an order directing the parties to the lease to vary it in such manner as is so specified; and accordingly any reference in this
11 Part (however expressed) to an order which effects any variation of a lease or to any variation effected by an order shall include a reference to an order which directs the parties to a lease to effect a variation of it or (as the case may be) a reference to any variation effected in pursuance of such an order.
(9) A tribunal may by order direct that a memorandum of any variation of a lease effected by an order under this section shall be endorsed on such documents as are specified in the order.
(10) Where a tribunal makes an order under this section varying a lease the tribunal may, if it thinks fit, make an order providing for any party to the lease to pay, to any other party to the lease or to any other person, compensation in respect of any loss or disadvantage that the tribunal considers he is likely to suffer as a result of the variation.
1
Case Reference
: BIR/00CT/LVT/2020/0005
HMCTS
: Paper
Property
: [ADDRESS] 915/917 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant
: [redacted]
: [COUNSEL] LLP
Respondents
: [redacted] : 22nd July 2020
Tribunal
: Judge [NAME] of Order
: 8th December 2020
____________________________________
ORDER ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020
2
UPON the [NAME] dated 22nd July 2020 and the Tribunal’s decision dated 8th December 2020
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1) Pursuant to section 38(3) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 Act all the residential long leases at [NAME] are varied, with effect from the date of this Order, as follows:
1. Clause 1:4
2. Clause 1:13
To be deleted from the Lease
3. Clause 1:14
4. Paragraph 1 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
5. Paragraph 2 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
To be deleted from the Lease
6. Paragraph 3 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
To keep the roof foundations and external parts (including external walls and loadbearing walls and external door and windows (save the glass in any
3
Flat doors and windows) of [NAME] in good and substantial repair and to paint or otherwise treat (as may be appropriate) as often as may be reasonably necessary in a proper and workmanlike manner and with suitable materials of good quality such external parts of [NAME] and all other Buildings comprised in the Development
7. Paragraph 9:1 of Part II of the Fourth Schedule (Covenants by the Association as to the provisions of services)
8. Paragraph 6 of Part II of the Fifth Schedule (Expenditure to be recovered by means of the Maintenance Charge)
2) Pursuant to section 38(9) of the Act it is ordered that the Chief Land Registrar shall make such entries on the registers relating to the titles hereby affected for the purpose of recording and giving effect to the terms of this Order.
Judge JR Morris
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Developer Not Required for New Lease Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Entitled to Costs for Lease Extension Under 1993 Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Urgent Roof Repairs Dispensation Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Purchase Sum Set at £1 Due to Untraceable Landlord
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission for Urgent Repairs Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Repairs Dispensation Without Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Asbestos Removal Dispensation Without Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Challenged in First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord can change lease terms if a majority of leaseholders agree.
- Courts allow dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent works.
- Tenants are often entitled to reimbursement for reasonable legal and valuation costs.
- Adjustments to rent can be made to reflect the property's condition and improvements.
- Fair rent assessments consider the property's condition, market comparables, and statutory limits.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No clear losing patterns identified in the provided cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided that the landlord could vary the leases to replace a residential scheme manager with a non-residential one.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the a person of the address were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided in favour of the landlord because a sufficient majority of a person consented to the variation.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 sections 37 and 38 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that a sufficient majority of a person consented to the variation.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can seek to vary their leases if a sufficient majority of a person consent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of a person consent and the landlord's a person were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.
