First-tier Tribunal Approves Collective Enfranchisement Agreement Terms
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal approved the terms of a collective enfranchisement agreement, including the premium and costs, even though one party failed to execute the transfer. This decision was made on 13 March 2024 by Judge Sheftel.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have the terms of a collective enfranchisement agreement approved by the tribunal, even if one party fails to execute the transfer.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal approved the terms of a collective enfranchisement agreement, including the premium and costs, but reserved the right to execute the transfer through an officer of the court if necessary.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) approved the terms of a collective enfranchisement agreement, including the premium and costs, despite one party's failure to execute the transfer. The decision was made on 13 March 2024 by Judge Sheftel.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
In the FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Tribunal Case Reference : MM/LON/00AU/OCE/2023/0137 Property : 93 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] [RESPONDENT] Respondent : [redacted] [NAME] : [NAME] to determine the terms of a Collective Enfranchisement
Tribunal : Judge Sheftel Mr A [NAME] of Directions : 13 March 2024
DECISION
1. The Applicant served an Initial Notice under section 13 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 on 1 August 2022 and the Respondent served a Counter Notice on 4 October 2022.
2. Although the terms of acquisition, including the premium, were agreed, the Respondent failed to complete the transfer. The Applicant issued a claim in the County Court. By an Order dated 3 October 2023, District Judge Swan transferred the case to the Tribunal.
3. On 8 November 2023, the tribunal gave directions for the approval of the terms of transfer and the matter was listed for hearing on 12 March 2024. The applicant duly provided a bundle comprising 268 pages, including a draft TR1 transfer.
4. At the hearing, which took place by remote video conferencing, the Applicant was represented by [COUNSEL], solicitor for the Applicant. There was no attendance on behalf of the Respondent and the
2 Respondent has not participated in these proceedings save for an email to the tribunal dated 27 February 2024 stating “We are not sure what there is to determine. The premium and costs have been agreed”.
5. Accordingly, the form and content of the transfer as submitted with the [NAME], a copy of which is annexed to this Decision, are approved, save that provision is included to allow for the possibility of execution by an officer of the court should the Respondent continue to fail to execute the transfer, although it is hoped that this can be avoided.
6. The matter is returned to the County Court to deal with any consequential matters including in relation to the execution of the transfer and the Applicant’s claim for costs.
Judge Sheftel
Date: 13 March 2024
Rights of appeal By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-[NAME]-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
3 Annex – approved TR1
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Fire Alarm Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Challenges Unreasonable Insurance Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Orders Remedial Works for Building Safety Issues
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The applicant served an initial notice under the relevant Act, starting the collective enfranchisement process.
- The respondent served a counter notice, acknowledging the applicant's claim.
- The terms of acquisition, including the premium, were agreed between the parties.
- The tribunal approved the form and content of the transfer as submitted by the applicant.
- The tribunal included a provision for court execution if the respondent continued to fail to execute the transfer.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The respondent failed to complete the transfer, leading to the applicant's claim in the County Court.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal approved the terms of a collective enfranchisement agreement, including the premium and costs.
Who was involved?
The claimant and the respondent were involved in the collective enfranchisement process.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to approve the terms of the agreement because the premium and costs had been agreed upon, despite the respondent's failure to execute the transfer.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the terms of the agreement, including the premium and costs, had been agreed upon by both parties.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can seek approval of their collective enfranchisement agreement terms from the tribunal, even if one party fails to execute the transfer.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence and documents included the initial notice, counter notice, and the draft TR1 transfer.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure proper representation and understanding of the legal process.
