VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Approves Lease Variation for Energy Improvements

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal approved the landlord's request to vary the leases to allow for energy improvements using Air Source Heat Pumps, supported by the majority of the parties.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord is entitled to vary the leases to implement energy improvements using Air Source Heat Pumps if supported by the requisite majority of the parties.

Topics

tenancy variationenergy efficiencylandlord and tenant act

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 s.37

This section allows a majority of parties involved in two or more long leases of flats to apply to a tribunal for an order to vary these leases if the landlord is the same person for all leases. The application can proceed if all parties except one consent when there are less than nine leases, or if at least 75% of the parties consent and no more than 10% oppose when there are more than eight leases.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 s.38

This section permits a tribunal to make an order varying leases if the grounds for the application are established to the satisfaction of the tribunal. The tribunal can make variations either as specified in the application or as it deems fit, provided that the variation does not substantially prejudice any party and is reasonable in the circumstances.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal varied the leases to allow the landlord to replace the current heating system with Air Source Heat Pumps.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal allowed the landlord to vary the leases to implement energy improvements using Air Source Heat Pumps, supported by the requisite majority of the parties, under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AG/LVL/2025/0004 Properties :

[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] 27 and 29 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Representative : Judge & Priestley ([NAME]) Respondents :

[redacted] 11, 13, 15 and [ADDRESS] who are named in Appendix 1 [NAME], 27 [NAME], [ADDRESS] : In person Type of application : Application for variation of a lease under Part IV of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987

Tribunal members : Judge Robert Latham Date and venue of determination : 16 September 2025 at 10 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

DECISION

The Tribunal makes an Order pursuant to section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 varying all the residential leases in respect of [ADDRESS] as specified in Appendices 2 to 5. The effect of the variation is to allow the Applicant to replace the current heating system with Air Source Heat Pumps. The variations to the leases at [ADDRESS] are to take effect from 8 December 2025. The variations to the leases at 27-[ADDRESS] are to take effect from 10 October 2025.

2

Introduction

1. On 2 May 2025, the Applicant issued this application to vary the following leases: Flats 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 13, 15 and 16 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] and 27 and 29 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]. The application is brought pursuant to section 37 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 ("the Act"). This provides for a lease to be varied where at least 75% of the lessees support the variation and not more than 10% oppose it. The relevant date for assessing these percentages is the date on which the application was issued.

2. The Applicant is planning energy improvement projects which involve moving Residents off Camden's system for heating and hot water and on to Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs). This application relates to the schemes at [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] and at 27 and 29 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]: (i) [ADDRESS] scheme has ten leaseholders. Copies of all of the leases are enclosed with this Application. All ten leaseholders have consented to this Application. (ii) There are two leases at [ADDRESS]. Both leaseholders have consented to this Application.

3. Leaseholders will have [NAME] inside the home but there will also be a condenser box for each unit located outside their home. [ADDRESS] the condenser boxes for each unit will be located in the roof space within the block and at the rear of the building. [ADDRESS] the condenser boxes will be situated in the gardens of the two properties.

4. There are four versions of the lease to be varied: (i) Old Form Leases – 4, 5, 6 and [ADDRESS], (ii) New Form Leases – 2, 3, 8, 13 and [ADDRESS], (iii) [ADDRESS] and (iv) 27 and [ADDRESS].

5. On 27 June 2025, the Tribunal gave Directions. By 11 July, the Applicant was directed to send a copy of the application and the directions to any persons, the Applicant knew, or believed, are likely to be affected by the application, namely all leaseholders, mortgagees or guarantors. On 25 July, the Applicant confirmed that they had served the papers on the leaseholders and their lenders. They stated that they did not believe that anyone else was likely to be affected by the application.

6. By 1 August 2025, any party who opposed the application was required to return a Reply Form. No party has done so.

7. The Tribunal has determined this application on the papers. No party has requested an oral hearing. The Applicant has provided a Bundle of 288 pages in support of their application.

3

The Law

8. The Applicant applies to vary the leases under section 37 of the Act which provides for the variation of leases supported by the requisite majority of the parties. Section 37 provides (emphasis added): “(1) Subject to the following provisions of this section, an application may be made to the appropriate tribunal in respect of two or more leases for an order varying each of those leases in such manner as is specified in the application.

(2) Those leases must be long leases of flats under which the landlord is the same person, but they need not be leases of flats which are in the same building, nor leases which are drafted in identical terms.

(3) The grounds on which an application may be made under this section are that the object to be achieved by the variation cannot be satisfactorily achieved unless all the leases are varied to the same effect.

(4) An application under this section in respect of any leases may be made by the landlord or any of the tenants under the leases.

(5) Any such application shall only be made if—

(a) in a case where the application is in respect of less than nine leases, all, or all but one, of the parties concerned consent to it; or

(b) in a case where the application is in respect of more than eight leases, it is not opposed for any reason by more than 10 per cent of the total number of the parties concerned and at least 75 per cent. of that number consent to it.

(6) For the purposes of subsection (5)—

(a) in the case of each lease in respect of which the application is made, the tenant under the lease shall constitute one of the parties concerned (so that in determining the total number of the parties concerned a person who is the tenant under a number of such leases shall be regarded as constituting a corresponding number of the parties concerned); and

(b) the landlord shall also constitute one of the parties concerned.”

9. Section 38 provides (in so far as is relevant): (3) If, on an application under section 37, the grounds set out in subsection (3) of that section are established to the satisfaction of the tribunal with respect to the leases specified in the application, the tribunal may (subject to subsections (6) and (7)) make an order varying each of those leases in such manner as is specified in the order. …

4

(6) A tribunal shall not make an order under this section effecting any variation of a lease if it appears to the tribunal —

(a) that the variation would be likely substantially to prejudice—

(i) any respondent to the application, or

(ii) any person who is not a party to the application,

and that an award under subsection (10) would not afford him adequate compensation, or

(b) that for any other reason it would not be reasonable in the circumstances for the variation to be effected.

……

(10) Where a tribunal makes an order under this section varying a lease the tribunal may, if it thinks fit, make an order providing for any party to the lease to pay, to any other party to the lease or to any other person, compensation in respect of any loss or disadvantage that the tribunal considers he is likely to suffer as a result of the variation.

10. The Tribunal has regard to the relevant principles which are to be applied, and which are set out in the decision of the Upper Tribunal (“UT”) (HHJ Gerald and [NAME]) in [COMPANY] v [NAME] (“Shellpoint”) [2012] UKUT; [2013] L&TR 21. Having satisfied myself that the requisite thresholds have been met, there are five questions which I should ask: (i) What is or are the object or objects to be achieved by the proposed variations? As a matter of statutory construction, there may be single or multiple objects. It is for the applicant, not the tribunal, to identify the “object” or purpose which may be of infinite variety depending upon the facts and circumstances relating to the leases, buildings and flats in question. Identifying the objective is a question of evidence to be adduced by the applicants: [redacted] variations, and why? What problems or deficiencies are there or have there been in running the blocks and enforcing the leases? What is the purpose of the variations? Further, it is not for the tribunal to determine whether they approve of the object, but it is for the tribunal to make a finding, based upon the evidence, of what the object is (at [70]–[71]). (ii) Can the ‘object’ be satisfactorily achieved by the proposed variations(s) without varying all the leases to the same effect? There are two questions: does the proposed variation achieve the object, and if so, do all of the leases need to be varied to satisfactorily achieve that object? These are questions of evidence to be adduced by the applicants: [redacted] the proposed variations achieve that object or objects? Can that only be satisfactorily achieved if all the leases are varied to the same effect? Again, it is for the applicants, not the tribunal, to select the solution or

5

variation from what will frequently be one of a number of different options. If the majority of tenants are supportive, then it is not for the tribunal to second guess them although, the tribunal is at liberty to make suggestions. The jurisdiction is relatively narrow, and is not intended to allow rewriting of leases merely because that is the will of the majority and in many cases may well seem sensible (at [72]-[74]). The contractual intent of the original parties should not be altered without good reason or sound evidence ([78]). (iii) Would the proposed variations be likely substantially to prejudice the respondents to the applications such that they cannot be adequately compensated by an award under section 38(10)? (iv) Is there any other reason it would not be reasonable in the circumstances for the variations to be effected? (v) In all the circumstances, should the Tribunal exercise its discretion and make an order varying the leases? The Tribunal’s Determination

11. The Tribunal is satisfied that the thresholds specified in section 37(5)(b) have been met. All the Respondents support the application.

12. Given that the thresholds are met, it is necessary to address the five questions posed in Shellpoint. (i) What is the object to be achieved by the proposed variation? The objective is to enable the Applicant to implement energy improvement projects, by moving residents off the current system for heating and hot water and on to Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs). (ii) Can the ‘object’ be satisfactorily achieved by the proposed variations without varying all the leases to the same effect? The answer is "no". The Applicant is required to provide the current system pursuant to the existing leases. (iii) Substantial Prejudice, which cannot be adequately addressed by compensation No issue of prejudice arises. (iv) Any other reason why it would not be reasonable to vary the leases? No one has suggested why it might not be reasonable to vary the leases. (v) The Exercise of Discretion The Tribunal has a discretion to vary the leases. I am satisfied that it is appropriate to exercise this discretion.

6

13. The proposed variations are set out in Appendices 2 to 5: (i) Old Form Leases – 4, 5, 6 and [ADDRESS]: Appendix 2; (ii) New Form Leases – 2, 3, 8, 13 and [ADDRESS]: Appendix 3; (iii) [ADDRESS]: Appendix 4; and (iv) 27 and [ADDRESS] : Appendix 5. 14. . The variations to the leases at [ADDRESS] are to take effect from 8 December 2025. The variations to the leases at 27-[ADDRESS] are to take effect from 10 October 2025. These are the dates proposed by the Applicant.

15. The Directions make provision for the service of the Tribunal’s decision. The Tribunal will email a copy of its decision to the Applicant. The Applicant is responsible for serving a copy of the Tribunal’s decision on the Respondents.

16. The Directions also provided for the Applicant's Solicitor to file the attached Order with the Land Registry. Before doing so, the Solicitor must check the particulars in this decision and the Order. The Tribunal has taken the relevant leaseholders which are specified in Appendix 1 from the Official Copies of Register of Title provided by the Applicant. Some names were not correctly spelt in the list provided by the Applicant. The Tribunal will correct any errors under the slip rule.

Judge Robert Latham 16 September 2025

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such

7

reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

8

Appendix 1 – List of Leaseholders

Name and Address

Date – Term of Lease Flat 2 [NAME] - 21st May 2004 Term - 21st May 2004 to 21st December 2104

Flat 3 [NAME] and [NAME] - 6th September 1993 Term - 125 years from 21st May 1990

Flat 4 [NAME] - 11th September 1998. Term - 11th September 1998 to 24th December 2104

Flat 5 [NAME] - 11th May 2016. Term - 11th May 2016 until 24th December 2194.

Flat 6 [NAME] - 21st December 2001. Term - 21st December 2001 to 24th December 2104

Flat 8 [NAME] and [NAME] - 25th February 1991. Term - 125 years from 21st May 1990. Flat 11 [NAME] - 25th June 2002 Term - 31st January 1997 to 24th May 2115.

Flat 13 [NAME] - 27th March 2000. Term - 125 years from 27th March 2000.

Flat 15 [NAME] - 7th April 2021. Term - 7th April 2021 until 24th December 2194.

Flat 16 [NAME] - 6th November 2000 Term - 125 years from 6th November 2000.

27 [NAME] : 15 November 1999 Term : 125 years from 15 November 1999

[ADDRESS], Clayton O'Shea Date : 29 October 1990 Term : 125 years from 29 October 1990

9

Appendix 2: Old Form Leases – Flats 4, 5, 6 and [ADDRESS] the following:

1. Clause 5(7) 2. Clause 5(8) 3. In the case of [ADDRESS], clauses 5(6) and (7) 4. The words “the supply of hot water” in Clause 8. There shall be added after THE SCHEDULE of the lease a new “THE SECOND SCHEDULE” which will read as follows:

THE SECOND SCHEDULE

Definitions:

1. The following definitions apply Air Source Heat Pump (or ASHP) : means a device that transfers energy from ambient external air, in the form of useful heat from one place to another

ASHP Condenser: means a component of the air source heat pump equipment that acts as a heat exchanger whereby hot, compressed refrigerant gas is condensed to a liquid and cooled to recommence its journey around the circuit

ASHP Cylinder: means a component of the air source heat pump that is a tank designed to store hot water heated by the air source heat pump

[NAME]: means together the ASHP Condenser, the ASHP Cylinder, all associated pipework, buffer and expansion tanks, electrical connections, heat emitters (radiators), and associated ancillaries [NAME] : means an agreement that extends beyond the duration of the manufacturer's warranty, providing protection against defects and repairs for a longer period

2. Landlord’s Obligations:

2.1 The Landlord shall, at its own cost, install:

a. The ASHP in the Flat; and

b. The ASHP Condenser in the roof space of the Block

2.2 The Landlord shall, at the cost of the Tenant (and recoverable as a service and maintenance charge):

a. Obtain the [NAME] in relation to the [NAME];

10

b. Undertake annual maintenance of the [NAME] in each year of the Term.

c. Undertake or procure the undertaking of all required repairs in relation to the [NAME].

2.3 The Landlord shall use its best endeavours to make a claim under the [NAME] in relation to relevant repairs which are covered by the [NAME]

3. Tenant Obligations:

3.1 On being given 2 working days’ notice (by the Landlord), the Tenant shall provide the Landlord (and associated Landlord parties) access to the Flat, in order that the Landlord may:

a. Comply with its obligations in 2.1 and 2.2 above;

b. Undertake annual maintenance in relation to the [NAME]; and

c. Undertake any required repairs to the [NAME].

3.2 The Tenant acknowledges the Landlord’s right to charge for the cost (and covenants to pay such costs) of repair and maintenance of the [NAME], save where the Landlord is able to recover the same under the [NAME], as part of the service and maintenance charge.

3.3 The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord, a proportion of the cost attributable to the Premises, of procuring the [NAME].

11

Appendix 3: New Form Leases – Flats 2,3,8,13 and [ADDRESS] the following

1. The word “heating“ in the list of Category 1 Services at Clause 1 of the lease. 2. Clause 4.2.3 3. Clause 4.4 There shall be added after the Sixth Schedule of the Lease a new Seventh Schedule which will read as follows:

THE SEVENTH SCHEDULE

Definitions:

1. The following definitions apply

Air Source Heat Pump (or ASHP) : means a device that transfers energy from ambient external air, in the form of useful heat from one place to another

[NAME]: means together the ASHP Condenser, the ASHP Cylinder, all associated pipework, buffer and expansion tanks, electrical connections, heat emitters (radiators), and associated ancillaries

[NAME] : means an agreement that extends beyond the duration of the manufacturer's warranty, providing protection against defects and repairs for a longer period

2. Landlord’s Obligations:

2.1 The Landlord shall, at its own cost, install:

a. The ASHP in the Flat; and

b. The ASHP Condenser in the roof space of the Block

12

a. Obtain the [NAME] in relation to the [NAME];

2.4 The Landlord shall use its best endeavours to make a claim under the [NAME] in relation to relevant repairs which are covered by the [NAME]

3. Tenant Obligations:

a. Comply with its obligations in 2.1 and 2.2 above;

c. Undertake any required repairs to the [NAME].

13

Appendix 4: [ADDRESS] the following

1.The word “heating“ in the list of Category 1 Services at Clause 1 of the lease. 2.Clause 5.3

There shall be added after the Fourth Schedule of the Lease a new Fifth Schedule which will read as follows:

THE FIFTH SCHEDULE

Definitions:

2. Landlord’s Obligations:

2.1 The Landlord shall, at its own cost, install:

a. The ASHP in the Flat; and

b. The ASHP Condenser in the roof space of the Block.

a. Obtain the [NAME] in relation to the [NAME];

14

3. Tenant Obligations:

a. Comply with its obligations in 2.1 and 2.2 above;

c. Undertake any required repairs to the [NAME].

3.2 The Tenant acknowledges the Landlord’s right to charge for the cost (and covenants to pay such costs) of repair and maintenance of the SHP Equipment, save where the Landlord is able to recover the same under the [NAME], as part of the service and maintenance charge.

15

Appendix 5: Leases – 27 and [ADDRESS] the following

THE SEVENTH SCHEDULE

Definitions:

2. Landlord’s Obligations:

2.1 The Landlord shall, at its own cost, install:

a. The ASHP in the Flat; and

b. The ASHP Condenser in the roof space of the Block.

16

a. Obtain the [NAME] in relation to the [NAME];

d. Undertake or procure the undertaking of all required repairs in relation to the [NAME].

3. Tenant Obligations:

a. Comply with its obligations in 2.1 and 2.2 above; b. Undertake annual maintenance in relation to the [NAME]; and c. Undertake any required repairs to the [NAME].

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The application met the legal threshold because all leaseholders consented to the proposed variations.
  • The objective of the variation was to implement energy improvement projects by switching to Air Source Heat Pumps.
  • The proposed variations were necessary because the current system was required by existing leases and the object could not be achieved otherwise.
  • The tribunal found no substantial prejudice to the respondents that could not be adequately compensated.
  • The tribunal found no other reason why it would not be reasonable to vary the leases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal allowed the landlord to vary the leases to implement energy improvements using Air Source Heat Pumps.

Who was involved?

The landlord and the leaseholders were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the support of the requisite majority of the parties and the need for energy improvements.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 sections 37 and 38 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the support of the requisite majority of the parties for the energy improvements.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation could seek to vary their leases for energy improvements if supported by the requisite majority of the parties.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of support from the requisite majority of the parties and the need for energy improvements mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure proper representation.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.