First-tier Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at £245.50 for Property in Ruislip
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property in Ruislip, setting it at £245.50 per week, following the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
⚖️ Legal holding
The fair rent for a property is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property in Ruislip, capping it at £245.50 per week.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property in Ruislip, capping it at £245.50 per week, following the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📚 Full judgment Official document
FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AS/F77/2025/0239
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 113A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [COMPANY]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £245.50 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 21 October 2025
3. The amount for services is not applicable £ Per
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 as prescribed by the Order, the calculation is overleaf.
Chairman E [NAME] of decision 21 October 2025
FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 407.7
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 364.5
X 407.7 Minus Y 364.5 = (A) 43.2
(A) 43.2 Divided by Y 364.5 = (B) 011852
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.16852
Last registered rent* £221 Multiplied by (C) = £245.38 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £245.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £258.50 Per week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference : LON/00AS/F77/2025/0239
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : 113A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent
: [redacted] : 9 July 2025
Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 21 October 2025 Hearing remote on the papers
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
This has been a hearing on the papers which has not been objected to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because, no-one requested the same and I determined that the matter could be dealt with on the papers. The documents which I was referred to were in a bundle the contents of which I have recorded. The registered rent with effect from 21 October 2025 is £245.50 per week.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Background
1. On 26 May 2025 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £320 per week for the above property.
2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £221 per week which had been registered by the rent officer on 21 February 2023 with effect from 25 April 2023.
3. On 2 July 2025, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £253.89 per week with effect from the same date.
4. The landlord objected to the registered rent on 9 July 2025.
5. The tribunal issued Directions on 27 August 2025. No written representations were received from or on behalf of either the landlord or the tenant.
The Law
6. When determining a fair rent I, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. I also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. I am unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.
7. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:
That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and
That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.
Valuation 8. In the first instance I determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms considered usual for such an open market letting. As neither party provided any comparable evidence I relied on my own general knowledge of rents within Ruislip and concluded that if the maisonette was in the condition usually found on the open market it would let for £400 per week.
9. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £400 per week to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). I determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £80 to reflect lack of modernisation, floor coverings, curtains and white goods and difference in terms and conditions.
10. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £320 per week. I am of the opinion that there is substantial scarcity for similar sized properties in greater London and therefore made a deduction of approximately 20% for scarcity. The uncapped fair rent is £255 per week.
11. The fair rent is the maximum rent the landlord may charge.
Decision
12. The uncapped fair rent initially determined for the purposes of section 70, is above the maximum fair rent of £245.50 per week calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. Therefore, the rent will be capped under the provisions of the Order.
13. Accordingly, the sum of £245.50 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 21 October 2025 being the date of my decision.
Chairman: [NAME]: 21 October 2025
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp- pta-application-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands- chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for a Property in Hertford
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent of £112.00 per week for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent of £120 per week for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair rent of £600 under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent reflects the property's condition and market conditions.
- The fair rent is calculated based on the Retail Price Index (RPI) and the previous registered rent.
- The fair rent is set by the First-tier Tribunal based on the formula provided in the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- A landlord must consider the age, location, and state of repair of a property when registering a fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The fair rent for a property is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided the fair rent for a property in Ruislip, setting it at £245.50 per week.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, which sets a cap on the fair rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the calculation of the maximum fair rent according to the Order.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the landlord, who wanted a higher rent.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should expect their fair rent to be capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The latest Retail Price Index (RPI) figures and the previous registered rent were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
