First-tier Tribunal Determines Capped Rent Increase for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a rent increase for an assured periodic tenancy, capping the increase at 5% as per the agreement between the tenant and landlord.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a capped rent increase as per their agreement when a rent review takes place.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new period, and the terms of the original tenancy excluding the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a capped rent increase of 5% for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a rent of £1,653.75 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy, adhering to a 5% cap on rent increase as per the agreement between the tenant and landlord.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AM/MNR/2023/0357
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 169 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] A [ADDRESS], Harringay, London, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1653.75 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 3rd September 2023
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 3rd August 2023
6. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Dining table, 4 dining chairs, 2 bed frames and mattresses, drawer unit, coffee table.
9. Description of premises A purpose built two bedroom first floor flat forming part of a five storey block built in 1938 with 2 bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom, lavatory.
[NAME] of Decision 31st October 2023
1
Case Reference
: LON/OOAM/MNR/2023/0357
Property : 169 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
TenantS
: Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] & Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord : Mr [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 15th March 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 31st October 2023
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,653.75 per calendar month with effect from 3rd April 2023. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On the 31st August 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,000 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,575 per month to take effect from 3rd September 2023.
2. On the 15th August 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the landlord and tenant together with a comparable evidence, photographs and floor plan.
Determination and Valuation
5. In the agreement there is a clause on the first page of the agreement clause 1 Terms of the Tenancy. It states, The Landlord and Tenant may renew this contract for a term to be fixed and agreed mutually at the time of renewal and may, at that time, vary any terms and conditions contained herein and there will be a 5% cap on the rent increase for an additional 12 months.
6. So the first thing the Tribunal must decide is: should this clause be considered, when calculating the rent in accordance with the Act. The rent review clause provides a clearly set out mechanism to determine the rent and surely it was what each party contemplated when a rent review takes place. The Tribunal must be obliged to take into consideration this clause in the agreement. Clause 1 must be a relevant consideration in the calculation of the rent review and cannot be put to one side.
For these reasons the Tribunal will carry out two calculations and the lesser of the two will be the new rental figure.
7. Firstly, having consideration of the parties’ comparable evidence together with our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Homerton area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be £1,850 per month. From this level of rent we have made no adjustments in relation to condition.
3
8. The 5% capped increase provides a rental figure of £1,653.75 per month.
9. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,653.75 per calendar month.
Decision 10. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy governed by the relevant clause in the agreement was £1,653.75 per calendar month.
11. The Tribunal directs the new rent of 1,653.75 to take effect on the 3rd September 2023. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.
Chairman: [NAME]: 31 October 2023
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Refurbished Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenancy agreement included a clause capping rent increases at 5% for an additional 12 months.
- The Tribunal was obligated to consider the rent review clause in the agreement when calculating the new rent.
- The 5% capped increase resulted in a lower rental figure than the open market rent.
- The Tribunal determined the new rent based on the capped increase, as it was the lesser of the two calculations.
- The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed rent of £2,000 per month was not accepted as the final rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided on a rent of £1,653.75 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy, with a 5% cap on rent increase.
Who was involved?
The tenant and landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the agreement between the tenant and landlord, which includes a 5% cap on rent increase.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the agreement between the tenant and landlord, which includes a 5% cap on rent increase.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure their agreement includes a cap on rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions, comparable evidence, photographs, and floor plans mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it's always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
