First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a new rental amount for an assured periodic tenancy after considering evidence from both parties. The final determined rent was £2227.50 per month, effective April 1st, 2023.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to determine a new rent under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 if it reflects the open market value adjusted for specific conditions.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the original tenancy, excluding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusting the proposed rent of £2005 to £2227.50 per month based on open market values and specific property conditions.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AG/MNR/2023/0144
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 13 St. [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Valuer 079475
[RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 2227.50 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 April 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable n/a Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 4 May 2021
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with lease terms
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Floor coverings and white goods
9. Description of premises A second floor flat in a three storey purpose built block. The accommodation comprises 1 living room, 2 bedrooms, kitchen and bathroom/WC.
[NAME] of Decision 15 November 2023
1
Case Reference
: TR/LON/00AG/MNR/2023/0144
Property : 13 St Joseph’s [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT] von Wietersheim-
Kramsta
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 29 March 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] Valuer
Date of Summary Reasons
: 15 November 2023
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £2227.50 per calendar month with effect from1 April 2023. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On the 20 February 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 2,005 in place of the existing rent of £ 1,368 per month to take effect from 1 April 2023.
2. On 29 March 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant. No submission was received from the tenant.
Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £2,700 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect tenant improvements, tenant furniture and floor coverings, dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
3
Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £2,227.50 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £2,227.50 to take effect on 1 April 2023. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
Chairman: [NAME]: 15 November 2023
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision.
If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £2,125 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1750 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1875 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1680 per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent reflects the open market value adjusted for specific conditions.
- The rent is determined based on the condition and location of the property.
- The rent is set at a fair and reasonable level based on comparable evidence and local rental values.
- The rent is adjusted for specific conditions of the property under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The rent is set by the First-tier Tribunal after disputing a landlord's proposed increase under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed rent was dismissed because it did not reflect the open market value as proved by comparable evidence and expert knowledge.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rental amount for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A tenant and their landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered evidence from both parties to determine a fair market rent based on property conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied in determining the new rental amount.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument about open market value and specific property conditions was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant, as the rent increased from £1368 to £2227.50 per month.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase should gather evidence of market conditions and property specifics to argue their case.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence about the open market value and specific property conditions was important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, if there are grounds for appeal based on legal errors in the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
