VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent for a property, setting it at £900 per month after considering evidence from both parties and local rental values.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a determination of a fair market rent based on comparable evidence and local rental values.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on comparable evidence and local rental values.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair market rent for a property based on comparable evidence and local rental values.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair market rent of £900 per month for a property based on comparable evidence and local rental values, rejecting the landlord's proposed rent of £1,020 per month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AL/MNR/2024/0359

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord’s Agent : [RESPONDENT] of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Ms [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 2 December 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £900.00 per calendar month with effect from 10 July 2024 ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 29 May 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,020 per month place of the existing rent of £892.54 per month to take effect from 10 July 2024.

2. On 29 June 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 9 July 2024.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant. There were no written submissions from the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the Tenant and of my own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, I consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition. As described by the Tenant would be in the region of £900 per calendar month.

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £900 per calendar month.

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £900 per calendar month.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £900.00 per month to take effect on 10 July 2024date. this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman: [NAME]: 2 December 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal

3 will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AL/MNR/2024/0359

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord’s [APPELLANT] 65a, [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 900.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 10 July 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable N/A Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per s11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord 1 bed, 2 chairs, 1 table and 1 wardrobe.

9. Description of premises One room with ensuite shower room(circa 230 sq ft including 40 sq ft shower room) in a shared house with a communal kitchen. No central heating.

[NAME] of Decision 2 December 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on comparable evidence.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment taking into account the condition of the property.
  • The tenant can challenge a proposed rent increase through the First-tier Tribunal.
  • Rent should be determined according to the open market value of the property.
  • A fair rent determination must consider open market conditions.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair market rent of £900 per month for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord's agent were involved in the dispute over the rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and local rental values, setting a fair market rent of £900 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's evidence of comparable properties and local rental values was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can refer a rent increase to the Tribunal for a fair market rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from the tenant and the Tribunal's own knowledge of rental values in the area mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal the decision within a month.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.