VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £2,100 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, ensuring the rent reflects the current market value of the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the open market value of the property.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancyhousing act

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy and ensures that the terms of the new tenancy match those of the original tenancy except for the rent amount.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £2,100 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £2,100 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the open market value of the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BB/MNR/2025/0749

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 180 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Judge Dutton Mr K Ridgeway MRICS

Landlord [NAME] through [COMPANY] 223 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] and [APPELLANT] [NAME]. The rent is: £ 2,100 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 19 April 2025

*3. The amount included for services/ not applicable

Per

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 19 January 2023

6. Length of the term or rental period One year

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per the tenancy agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

9. Description of premises Terraced house comprising 5 rooms, kitchen and bathroom with garden

Chairman Andrew Dutton Date of Decision 12 August 2025

(c)

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BB/MNR/2025/0749 Property : 180 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] [APPELLANT] and [APPELLANT] [NAME] Landlord : [RESPONDENT] through [COMPANY] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Judge Dutton Mr. K Ridgeway MRICS Date and venue of Consideration : Paper determination 12 August 2025 Date of Summary Reasons : 12 August 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £2,100 per calendar month with effect from 19 April 2025. ____________________________________

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 5 March 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,500 in place of the existing rent of £ 1,900 per month to take effect from 19 April 2025

2 2. On 18 March 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 20 March 2025 Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence 4. There were no written submissions from the parties. Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £2,100 per calendar month. In the absence of any submissions made by either party we do not consider any deductions from this open market rent need be made.

6. The Tribunal determines a rent of £2,100 per calendar month. Decision 7 The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £2,100 per calendar month. 8 The Tribunal directs the new rent of £2,100 to take effect on 19 April 2025 this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. There is no evidence that this would cause the tenant undue hardship.

Chairman: Judge Dutton

Date: 12 August 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this

3 decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent reduction due to ongoing property defects.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and market conditions.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
  • A tenant is entitled to a determination of a market rent for their assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the open market value of the property in good condition.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £2,100 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the open market value of the property, ensuring the rent was fair.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the need to set a fair rent based on the open market value.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined fairly based on the open market value.

What evidence or documents mattered?

No written submissions were provided, but the Tribunal considered the open market value.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if the party wishes to challenge the rent determination.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.