VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a rented property, taking into account the property's condition and local market conditions. The fair rent was set at £769.00 per month, which is less than the maximum allowed rent.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market conditions.

Topics

fair rent determinationregulated tenancymaximum fair rent calculation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under a regulated tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under a regulated tenancy, considering the property's condition and market conditions. The fair rent was set at £769.00 per calendar month, below the maximum fair rent of £920.50 per month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AQ/F77/2019/0220

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 29 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Ms [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord BPT ([APPELLANT]) Limited

Tenant Mr G. [RESPONDENT]

1. The fair rent is 769.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 20 February 2020

3. The amount for services is - Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £920.50 per month.

[NAME] of decision 20/02/2020

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 291.9

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 275.3

X 291.9 Minus Y 275.3 = (A) 16.6

(A) 16.6 Divided by Y 275.3 = (B) 0.060298

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.110298

Last registered rent* 829 Multiplied by (C) = 920.44 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 920.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £920.50 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the

variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

:

LON/ 00AQ/F77.2019/0220

Property

: [ADDRESS], Harrow, Middx. [POSTCODE].

Applicant: [redacted]

: [NAME] [APPELLANT]

Respondent: [redacted]

: In person

Type of Application

:

Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer

Tribunal Member(s)

: [NAME] Mr. O. Miller

Date of Inspection

: 20 February 2020.

Date of Decision

:

20 February 2020.

DECISION

1. The landlord made an application on 25 September 2019 to register the rent of the property at £953.35 per month instead of the rent passing of £829.00 per month.

2. On 24 October 2019 the Rent Officer registered the rent at £875.00 per month, with effect from 15 December 2019.

3. The landlord objected and the matter was referred to the First Tier Tribunal, Property Chamber.

4. The Tribunal made directions on 19 December 2019 stating that the application would be determined on the papers without a hearing in accordance with Rule 31 of the Tribunal Procedure Rules unless a party objected and requiring the landlord to send to the tenant and to the tribunal a written statement as to their assessment of the rent and for the tenant to respond.

5. No objections were received, and the tribunal determines the matter on the papers, following an inspection.

Inspection

6. On 20 February 2020 the Tribunal inspected the property and found it to be a two-storey terraced house, of traditional brick construction, under a pitched and tiled roof. To the ground floor is a through lounge and kitchen (installed by the tenant), to the first floor were two bedrooms and a bathroom (installed by the tenant). The property benefits from full central heating and double glazing and has a small private garden to the rear. The tenant confirmed that, at the start of the tenancy, the property had no heating, water supply or bathroom and only had an outside toilet. The tenant has installed a kitchen and bathroom/w.c. during the tenancy and had provided electrical wiring and sockets. The tenant accepted the landlord has re-wired the property during the tenancy.

Hearing/ The parties Representations.

7. The landlord provided a statement of case, and suggested within that, that the rent requested of £953.35 per month was a ‘reasonable ask’. Details of open market lettings were produced, which suggested a starting market rent of £1,350.00 per calendar month. The landlord has then made deductions from this starting point to reflect the lack of white goods and the tenant’s improvements.

The law

8. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It must also disregard the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or

other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.

9. Case law informs the Tribunal;

a. That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and

b. That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).

Consideration and Valuation

10. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. The Tribunal did this by having regard to information provided by the landlord, and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels and arrived at a starting point of £1,350.00 per calendar month.

11. However, the rent referred to in the above paragraph is on the basis of a modern open market letting where the tenant has no liability to carry out repairs or decorations, there are up to date bathroom and kitchen fittings, the landlord supplies white goods, carpets and curtains and there are no wants of repair. In this case [list differences].

12. In making its own adjustments to reflect the lower bid a [NAME] would make to reflect the differences between the property in a modern lettable state and that as provided by the landlord we make a deduction of 5% to reflect the different repairing obligations under the secure tenancy, and a further 25% to reflect the fact that the property must be valued without a bathroom or kitchen, and we find that in the current market, many tenants would not be prepared to take on such a property. The 25% deduction also includes an amount for the lack of white goods, carpet and curtains as would be found in a modern letting.

13. We then considered the question of scarcity as referred to in paragraph 9a above. The landlord suggested that a 10% would be sufficient to reflect the imbalance of supply and demand in the market. We consider this figure to be too low. We consider there to be a significant shortage of modest properties such as the subject and reflect that in a deduction of 20%.

14. We therefore determined that the uncapped Fair Rent is £769.00 per calendar month.

15. As this amount is below the rent calculated in accordance with the Maximum Fair Rent Order details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice, we determine that the lower sum of £769.00 per month is registered as the fair rent with effect from 20 February 2020.

Name: Ms. [NAME]. [NAME] 21 February 2020.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's market rent was initially assessed at £1,350.00 per month.
  • A 5% deduction was applied to the market rent to account for different repairing obligations under the secure tenancy.
  • A 25% deduction was made because the property was valued without a bathroom or kitchen, and lacked white goods, carpet, and curtains.
  • A 20% deduction was applied to reflect the significant shortage of modest properties in the market.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's suggestion that a 10% deduction for scarcity was sufficient was rejected.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair rent for a rented property, setting it at £769.00 per month.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a landlord and a tenant.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and local market conditions to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the local market conditions.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, who wanted a fairer rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local market conditions when negotiating a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included the condition of the property and comparable market rents.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure your rights are protected.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.