VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £5897.00 per annum for a regulated tenancy under the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The decision was made on 3 December 2019.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined in accordance with the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

regulated tenancyfair rent determination

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a regulated tenancy under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £5897.00 per annum for a regulated tenancy under the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The decision was made on 3 December 2019 by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00FY/F77/2019/0038

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 41 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Mr [NAME] J Ellis Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord Metropolitan

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 5897.00 Per Annum (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 03 December 2019

3. The amount for services is

Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is 0.00 Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £6464.50 per annum prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Mr [NAME] J Ellis Date of decision 3 December 2019

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 290.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 193.1

X 290.4 Minus Y 193.1 = (A) 97.3 (A) 97.3 Divided by Y 193.1 = (B) 0.50388

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.55388

Last registered rent* 4160 Multiplied by (C) = 6464.16 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 6464.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £6464.50 Per Annum

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL

PROPERTY CHAMBER

(RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference : BIR/ 00FY/F77/2019/0038

Property : 41, [ADDRESS]

[POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

Respondent’s : None Representative

Application : Determination of fair rent

Under s70 Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts

(Maximum Fair Rent)Order 1999 Tribunal : Tribunal Judge P. J. Ellis.

Tribunal Member Colin Gell FRICS.

Date of Inspection : 3 December 2019 And Decision

Date of Reasons : 14 February 2020

DECISION _____________________________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020

Introduction 1. On 3 December 2019 the First-tier Tribunal made its determination of the rent to be registered under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999 and the fair rent in accordance with s 70 Rent Act 1977 (the Act). The rent determined was £5897.00pa. The Applicant requested reasons for the Tribunal’s decision on 28 December 2019.

2. On inspection the Tribunal found the subject property was a semi detached three bedroom house which was double glazed throughout with gas central and water heating. The lower floor comprised a living room and kitchen diner and a w/c. The upper floor comprised three bedrooms, two double, one single and a bathroom. The landlord supplied kitchen fitted cupboards but the Applicant had supplied all white goods, curtains or window blinds and floor coverings.

3. The tenant pointed out that the Respondent had removed the gas fire from the lounge area for safety reasons and that the room was cold. There was a central heating radiator within the room and whilst the Tribunal cannot comment on the capacity of the radiator to heat the space, it was noted that the efficiency of the radiator was compromised by washing being draped over restricting radiating and convecting heat.

4. The property was built of conventional brick and tile construction in or around 1987 as part of an estate of mixed houses and apartments. The property was first let to the Applicant’s mother. The Applicant succeeded to the tenancy upon the death of her mother in 2015.

5. The terms of the tenancy imposed decoration liability on the tenant. The landlord is responsible for repairs and external decorations.

6. The last rent registration prior to the subject registration was October 2005. The rent registered with effect from 30 October 2005 was £4160.00 pa.

The Statutory Framework 7. S70 Rent Act 1977 provides: In determining, for the purposes of this Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling-house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to— (a)the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, (b)……… (c)……… (2)For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in the locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms. (3)There shall be disregarded— (a)any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b)any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the (e)if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.

8. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 limits fair rent increases by linking the increase to a Retail Price Index (RPI) formula and applies to applications for registration made on or after 1 February 1999.

9. Under the Order, it is necessary to still determine fair rent in accordance with s70 of The Rent Act 1977. However, there must also be a calculation of the “maximum fair rent” according to a formula linked to RPI.

10. The Maximum Fair Rent Order sets out the formula used for calculating the Maximum Fair Rent. Determination of fair rent 11. Neither party gave any evidence of comparable rents or any other information which might have affected the rental valuation. The Respondent did not attend and made no written submissions. The Applicant was present during the inspection but did not have any knowledge of local rents. The Rent Officer determined that the open market rent was £7,280.00. The Tribunal relying on its knowledge saw no reason to disagree with that assessment.

12. The Tribunal then determined adjustments required by s70 of the Act as: 5% decoration liability

£364.00 Tenant’s white goods

£254.80 Curtains

£109.20 Total for adjustments

£728.00

Less 10% for scarcity:(7280-728)*10% (£6,552) £655.20

Total for deductions

£1383.20

Fair Rent

£5896.80 SAY

£5897.00

13. The maximum fair rent calculation deduced an increase from £4160.00 to £6464.50 pa but as the fair rent determined in accordance with s70 is £5897.00 the rent is not limited by the Maximum Fair Rent Order. The rent does not include any payment for services or any other element for furniture or council tax and utilities.

Appeal 14. If either of the parties is dissatisfied with this decision they may apply to this Tribunal for permission to appeal on a matter of law to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Any such application must be received within 28 days after these written reasons have been sent to them rule 52 of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013).

Tribunal Judge PJ Ellis Chair

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its own knowledge to agree with the Rent Officer's assessment of the open market rent.
  • A 10% deduction was applied for scarcity, reflecting the assumption that demand for similar properties is not substantially greater than supply.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant's argument that the room was cold due to a removed gas fire was not accepted as a reason to adjust the rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £5897.00 per annum for a regulated tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the determination of the fair rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the terms of the tenancy agreement and the statutory framework provided by the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the statutory framework to determine the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their tenancy agreement is in compliance with the relevant statutes and regulations.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The terms of the tenancy agreement and the statutory framework were the primary evidence considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party may apply to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) for permission to appeal on a matter of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving regulated tenancies.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.