First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977. They considered factors such as the property's age, location, and condition. The decision was made by a person FRICS on 21 May 2020.
⚖️ Legal holding
A fair rent is determined by considering the property's age, location, and state of repair, among other factors.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, taking into account the property's age, location, and state of repair, among other factors. The decision was made by Mr B H R Simms FRICS on 21 May 2020.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00MS/F77/2020/0009
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 26 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [COMPANY]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The fair rent is £170.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 21 May 2020
3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
None
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £172.50 per week prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 21 May 2020
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 292.6
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 275.3
X 292.6 Minus Y 275.3 = (A) 17.3
(A) 17.3 Divided by Y 275.3 = (B) 0.06284
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1128405
Last registered rent* £155.00 Multiplied by (C) = 172.49 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £172.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £172.50 Per Week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00MS/F77/2020/0009 Property : 26 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Type of Application : Determination of a fair rent: Rent Act 1977 Date of Decision : 21 May 2020 Tenant : [NAME] Landlord : [COMPANY] Tribunal Member : [NAME] (Chairman)
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
2 Background
1. On 29 November 2019 the Landlord, made an application to register the rent of the property at £104.05 per week in place of the existing rent of £98.08 per week.
2. On 29 January 2020 the Rent Officer registered the rent at £170.00 per week with effect from the same date.
3. The Tenant objected to the rent registered and on 11 February 2020 the Rent Officer referred the case to the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
4. Directions for the conduct of the case were issued dated 24 February 2020. The Tribunal intended to determine the rent on the basis of an inspection of the property and written representations subject to the parties requesting an oral hearing. No request was made by the parties for a hearing. On 19 March 2020 the Tribunal issued a notice in respect of the Coronavirus pandemic cancelling an inspection and requesting photographs from the parties if required. No objection to this procedure was received.
5. In response to Directions neither party made any written representations. Neither party took the opportunity to respond to the request for further information following the cancellation of the inspection. The Rent Service provided the Tribunal with copies of the original application, the rent register entries, a summary of the Rent Officer’s calculations and relevant correspondence. All documents were circulated to the parties.
Inspection
6. As advised to the parties the Tribunal did not inspect the property. The Tribunal proceeded to determine the matter based on the written evidence submitted.
7. The property is described in the application for registration and in the rent register as a semi-detached house built in about 1995 with central heating. The accommodation is listed as: Ground Floor: Living Room; Kitchen; WC. First Floor: 2 Bedrooms; Bathroom with WC. Second Floor: 1 Bedroom; Store. Outside: Car parking space and garden.
Representations
8. Neither party made any representations. The rent Service did not supply details of any comparable rents.
9. The law
10. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It must also disregard the personal circumstances of the Landlord or of the Tenant and the effect on the rental value of the property of:
(a) any relevant tenant's improvements and
3
(b) any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy.
11. Ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms (other than as to rent) to that of the regulated tenancy).
12. For the purpose of determining the market rent, assured tenancy rents (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
13. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rents) Order 19991 (“MFR”) introduced statutory maximum (capping) limits to fair rents calculated using a formula based upon the previously registered rent, a standard addition and an inflation factor.
Valuation
14. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today on the terms and in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting.
15. Unfortunately neither the parties nor the Rent Service provided any evidence of rental values. The Rent Officer estimated the market rent at £208.00 per week but deducted £38.00 for unidentified matters.
16. Using our own knowledge of general rent levels for this type of property in the locality we determined that the starting point should be £208.00 per week on the assumption that the Tenant is responsible for keeping the interior in tenantable repair (we were not provided with a tenancy agreement).
17. However, without the benefit of an inspection and without any evidence of the condition of the property or other matters which might require the rent to be adjusted we have no reason to take issue with the Rent Officer’s assessment.
18. We therefore determined that the uncapped Fair Rent is £170.00 per week.
19. The uncapped rent of £170.00 is below the maximum fair rent of £172.50 per week calculated in accordance with MFR, details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice, we therefore determine that the sum of £170.00 per week is registered as the fair rent with effect from the date of the decision 21 May 2020.
Chairman: [NAME]: 21 May 2020
1 The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 SI 1999 No. 6
4
PERMISSION TO APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) West London Fair Rent Determination: Reasoning and Outcome
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent of £188.08 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at £190 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Tenanted Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's age is considered when determining a fair rent.
- The property's location is taken into account for setting a fair rent.
- The state of repair of the property influences the determination of a fair rent.
- Adjustments are made for tenant improvements and landlord neglect in calculating a fair rent.
- Scarcity of similar properties in the market affects the determination of a fair rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- Applications for a new fair rent based solely on changes in market conditions may be dismissed.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's age, location, and state of repair, among other factors.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rents) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the consideration of the property's condition and market value.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the same factors when determining a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rents were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.
