VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines New Market Rent for Furnished Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new market rent for a furnished property. They set the rent at £1900 per month, effective from June 1st, after considering evidence from both the tenant and landlord.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, adjusted for furnishings.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on the open market conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new market rent for a furnished property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new market rent of £1900 per calendar month for a furnished property, taking into account comparable evidence and the value of the provided furniture.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

Case Reference

: LON/OOAF/MNR/2024/0290

Property : 52 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection

: 7th May 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Judge Shepherd

Kevin Ridgeway MRICS FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Date of Summary

9th September 2024 Reasons

:

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1900 per calendar month with effect from 1st June 2024 ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 1st April 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2000 in place of the existing rent of £1000 per calendar month to take effect from 16

2. On 14th March 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 17th January 2024.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. The property is a brick and tile two storey end terraced house. The accommodation is comprised of 1 living room and one kitchen on the ground floor with 2

bedrooms and a bathroom on the first floor. There is also a garden, a conservatory and a garage to the side, which is unused as filled with the landlord's property. The house is let furnished.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition is £1700. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to an addition of £200 per month to reflect the furniture provided.

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1900 pcm 9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1900 to take effect on 1st June 2024.

Chairman: Judge Shepherd

9th September 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined a new rent of £1900 per calendar month.
  • The tribunal considered its own expert knowledge of rental values in the area.
  • The tribunal added £200 per month to the rent to account for the furniture provided.
  • The tribunal found the open market rent for the property in good condition to be £1700.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new market rent of £1900 per month for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered comparable evidence and the value of the furniture to determine the new rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The value of the furniture provided was a significant factor in determining the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, who requested the determination of a fair market rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should gather comparable evidence and highlight the value of any provided furnishings.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparative evidence and documentation regarding the property's condition and furnishings were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party may request full reasons and then apply for permission to appeal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.