VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Open Market Rent for Property in Bury

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the open market rent for a property in Bury, considering the condition and improvements made by the tenant. The rent was set at £900 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A willing landlord should consider the condition and location of the property, excluding tenant improvements, when determining the open market rent under an assured tenancy.

Topics

open market rentassured tenancytenant improvements

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will then determine the open market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. When making this determination, the tribunal must disregard any increase in the property's value due to improvements made by the tenant, unless these improvements were required by the tenant's obligations to the landlord.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal assessed the open market rent for a property in Bury, considering various factors including the condition and improvements made by the tenant.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the open market rent for a property in Bury, taking into account the condition and improvements made by the tenant, resulting in a rent of £900 per month. The decision was made by Judge J White on 21 October 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

FIRST – TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference : MAN/00BM/MNR/2021/0108 Property : 78 Prettywood. Bury [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of [NAME] :

s13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Judge J [NAME] of Decision :

15 August 2022 Date of Reasons : 21 October 2022 DECISION

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022

2

The Decision By a decision dated 15 August 2022, the Tribunal determined, in accordance. with section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, that the open market rent for the Property is £900 per month.

The Background

1. The Tenant entered into the Assured Shorthold Tenancy of 78 Prettywood. Bury [POSTCODE] (the Property) on 20 March 2015 at a rent of £650 per month. By a notice dated 7 August 2021, (“the Notice”), the Landlord proposed a new rent of £1,250 per month to take effect from 20 September 2021. The previous rent being £770. No additional services are provided.

2. By an [NAME] dated 14 August 2021, the Tenants referred the Notice to the Tribunal. The Property and Inspection 3. Following notification to the parties, the Tribunal attempted to gain access to inspect the Property on 16 August 2022 at 11 am and 12.15. No one appeared to be in the Property and we made an external inspection. These finding are based on that inspection, and evidence submitted by both parties. We had sufficient evidence, along with our own expertise and knowledge to reach a decision.

4. The Tenant provided the following evidence about the Property. This was not contradicted by the Landlord, was cogent and credible and so was accepted by the Tribunal.

5. The Property is a four bedroom end of terrace circa built c.1900 On the first floor is 1 living room, dining room, kitchen and toilet. On the first floor is 3 bedrooms and a bathroom. There is a fourth bedroom that is described as a box room.

6. To the front is a small area. To the back was a graveled yard that the tenant laid to lawn. There is a piece of land to the side that was derelict and unfenced at the start of the tenancy. This had contained old furniture, rubble and other dumped items, along with perennial weeds. The Tenant cleared the area, fenced it and again laid it to lawn. This piece of land is not part of the demised Property let to the Tenant, as evidenced by the Land Registry title plan, supplied by the tenant. It is not clear who owns this land.

7. The Property was let unfurnished with dirty carpets and in need of decoration. The tenant cleaned the carpets and decorated at the start of the tenancy. Since then the Tenant has carried out further improvements, including insulating the loft, adding sealant to a window, repairing a burst pipe in the garden.

8. The roof leaks intermittently, leaving stained paintwork.

9. From its external inspection, the Tribunal noted that the property is an end terrace house of traditional construction of brick elevations beneath a slate roof. There is a UPVC front door and double glazing to the front of the Property.

10. The location of the Property is on a busy main road near the M60 motorway. It is part of a short row of houses surrounded by commercial properties with limited parking on a piece of derelict land.

3

The Law 11. The Tribunal must first determine that the Landlord’s notice under section. 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.

12. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the Tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

13. In so doing the Tribunal, is required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.

14. Section 14(4) provides that for the purposes of section 14 “rent” includes amongst other things any sums payable to the landlord by the tenant in respect of council tax.

15. Section 14(4) provides that for the purposes of section 14 “rent” does not include a “service charge” within the meaning of section 18 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (i.e. where in accordance with the terms of the tenancy or other agreement a service charge payable by the tenant is variable from time to time according to changes in the relevant costs). However, it does include a “fixed” service charge.

Tribunals Deliberations

16. The Tribunal determined the Notice to be valid.

17. The Tribunal had to assess the rent in accordance with Section 14 Housing Act 1988, being the Rent at which the Tribunal considered that the subject property might reasonably be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy. In doing so it must comply with section 14 (1) of the Housing Act 1988 as referred to above.

18. The Tribunal accepted the Tenants evidence as set out above. Neither party stated the Property was particularly modernised or dated.

19. The Tribunal considered that the Landlord’s evidence of an estimated rental range was limited to Properties that were rented over £1250, over a very wide area and so were of limited value.

20. Using our own knowledge and experience of market rent levels in the relevant area we determined that the market rent for a similar dwelling in a similar locality could rent from £850 for 3 bedroom to £1,095 and above for 4 bedroom modernised properties. We therefore determined that, excluding the tenants improvements, the market rent is £950. We have deducted £50 for neglect as set out above. The open market rent is £900 per month.

21. This rent will take effect from 30 September 2021, being the date stipulated in the Notice. The Tenant has not provided evidence of hardship

Judge White 21 October 2022

4

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.

If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case.

The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.

If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent for a property is set at a reasonable level based on its condition.
  • Open market rent takes into account comparable properties in the area.
  • Tenants can challenge the reasonableness of rent adjustments.
  • Rent determinations consider minor disrepair and wear and tear.
  • Landlords must consider the open market value when setting rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The open market rent for the property was set at £900 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the condition and improvements made by the tenant, excluding these improvements from the calculation.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the exclusion of tenant improvements from the calculation of the open market rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord, setting the rent higher than the tenant proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should expect their open market rent to be assessed based on the condition and location of the property, excluding any improvements made by the tenant.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the condition of the property and the improvements made by the tenant were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving open market rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.