VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1150.00 Per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a property, considering its condition and comparing it to similar properties. They set the rent at £1150.00 per month, starting from July 1, 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the rent for their property assessed based on the open market value, adjusted for any disrepair or wear and tear.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent assessment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open market rent, considering the property's condition and comparing it to similar properties. The determined rent should reflect what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the open market rent for a property at £1150.00 per month after considering the property's condition and comparable properties.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) assessed the open market rent for a property, taking into account the property's condition and comparable properties, and set the rent at £1150.00 per month, effective from 1 July 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BR/MNR/2023/0245 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 99 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tribunal Judge Catherine Wood Tribunal Member James Gallagher Landlord [NAME] / [RESPONDENT] 2nd floor [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME] & Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is:£ 1150.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 July 2023 3. The amount included for services is not applicable 0.00 Per 4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 June 2022 5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly 6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per Tenancy Agreement 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets/Curtains; some white goods 8. Description of premises 3 bed T/H (2 Double, 1 Single); Large living room/dining room; hall; kitchen; rear garden Chairman Mrs Catherine Wood Date of Decision 12 January 2024

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00BR/MNR/2023/0245 Property : 99, [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] & Caroline Yeung Landlord : [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT] of Application : s13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Tribunal Judge C Wood Tribunal Member J Gallagher MRICS Date of Decision : 12 January 2024 _______________________________________________

DECISION Decision 1. By a decision dated 12 January 2024, the Tribunal determined, in accordance with section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, that the open market rent for the Property is £1150.00 per month, effective from 1 July 2023. Background 2. By a notice dated 1 June 2023, (“the Notice”), the Landlord proposed a new rent of £1150.00 per week to take effect from 1 July 2023.

3. By an application dated 26 June 2023, the Tenant referred the Notice to the Tribunal.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 Inspection 4. The Tribunal inspected the Property on 12 January 2024. One of the Tenants was present at the inspection.

5. The Property is a spacious garden-fronted mid-terraced house in a pleasant location with a 2-storey bay to the front elevation, it is mainly of red pressed brick construction with a slate roof, built in c1898. There is a single storey addition at the rear that forms the kitchen.

6. The accommodation comprises a hall, large through living room/dining room, and kitchen on the ground floor and 3 bedrooms (2 double/1 single) and small bathroom on the first floor. There is a yard to the rear of the Property.

7. The Property has Upvc double glazing and Upvc doors. There is gas central heating with radiators in all rooms; there is an electric fire in the living room.

8. The Property appears in generally in good condition. The following points were noted: 8.1 there are a few signs of possible damp to the kitchen ceiling, around the chimney breast and external walls in 2 of the bedrooms; 8.2 there is also minor damage to the floor covering in the living room; 8.3 the Landlord has provided the carpets and curtains and the white goods in the kitchen other than the washing machine which belongs to the Tenants; 8.4 the kitchen and bathroom fittings are in reasonable condition. The bath panel appears not to be fitted correctly. The Law 9. The Tribunal must first determine that the Landlord’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.

10. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the Tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

11. In so doing the Tribunal is required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.

12. Section 14(4) provides that for the purposes of section 14 “rent” includes amongst other things any sums payable to the landlord by the tenant in respect of council tax.

13. Section 14(4) provides that for the purposes of section 14 “rent” does not include a “service charge” within the meaning of section 18 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (i.e. where in accordance with the terms of the tenancy or other agreement a service charge payable by the tenant is variable from time to time according to changes in the relevant costs). However it does include a “fixed” service charge. Evidence 14. Neither of the parties made any written representations to the Tribunal. Tribunal’s Deliberations 15. Relying on its own knowledge and experience, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for a comparable property to the Property in good condition is £1200.00 per month.

16. From this, the Tribunal makes a deduction of £50.00 per month to reflect minor items of disrepair/wear and tear at the Property.

17. The Tribunal therefore determines that the open market rent for the Property in its present condition is £1150.00 per month.

18. This rent will take effect from 1 July 2023 being the date stipulated in the Notice.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the open market rent for a comparable property in good condition is £1200.00 per month.
  • The tribunal deducted £50.00 per month to account for minor disrepair and wear and tear.
  • The landlord's notice proposing a new rent was validly served and satisfied legal requirements.
  • The determined rent of £1150.00 per month will take effect from the date stipulated in the landlord's notice.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's proposed new rent of £1150.00 per week was not accepted.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent for the property at £1150.00 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the open market value of the property, adjusted for minor disrepair and wear and tear.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property to similar properties in good condition.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should expect their rent to be assessed based on the open market value, adjusted for the condition of the property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The condition of the property and comparisons to similar properties were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.