First-tier Tribunal Determines Reasonable Service Charges
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the service charges that tenants must pay to their landlord. They considered different costs like fire safety checks, insurance, and management fees, and ruled on what was reasonable according to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to challenge the reasonableness of service charges under section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the service charges payable by tenants under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the service charges payable by tenants under section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, considering various expenses including fire safety assessments, insurance, and management fees.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AR/LSC/2022/0004 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) : V: CVPREMOTE Property : First Floor Flat, [ADDRESS], Romford RM7 09J Applicant: [redacted] : Mr [COUNSEL] (of [COMPANY]) Respondents : [redacted] (2) [NAME] [COUNSEL] [NAME] : Mr [COUNSEL] in person Type of application : For the determination of the liability to pay service charges under section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal members : Judge S [NAME] [NAME] S Coughlin MCIEH Venue : [ADDRESS], [APPELLANT] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 01 November 2022 Dated of corrected decision : 15 February 2023
DECISION corrected under rule 50
2 Description of hearing This has been a remote video hearing which has been not objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was by video V: CVPREMOTE. The documents that we were referred to are in a bundle totalling 248 pages. Decision of the tribunal The tribunal determines that the following sums are payable by the respondents in respect of the following service charges:
2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 Communal lighting. £0.00 £0.00 £0.00 Fire safety assessment. £103.50 £106.50 £150.00 General maintenance. £60.00 £5.00 £125.00 Roof maintenance. £123.50 --- £125.00 Insurance. £206.80 £213.42 £225.00 Bank charges. £45.00 £45.00 £45.00 Accounts. £60.00 £300.00 £150.00 £300.00 £150.00 Management fee. £100.00 £100.00 £100.00 Gardening. --- --- £75.00 Window cleaning. --- --- £50.00
The application 1. The applicant landlord seek a determination pursuant to s.27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 as to the amount of service charges payable by
3 the respondent tenants in respect of the service charge years 2019/2020, 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 (interim). The background 2. The property which is the subject of this application is a first floor flat (“the flat”) in a two-storey house (“the house”) which has been converted into two flats. The communal area is a small hallway providing access to both flats (“the hallway”). The house is managed by [COMPANY] (“the [NAME]”).
3. Neither party requested an inspection and the tribunal did not consider that one was necessary, nor would it have been proportionate to the issues in dispute.
4. The respondents hold a long lease of the flat which requires the applicant to provide services and the respondents to contribute towards their costs by way of a variable service charge. The specific provisions of the lease will be referred to below, where appropriate. The hearing 5. The applicant was represented by Mr [APPELLANT] (of the [NAME]). The first respondent appeared on behalf of the respondents. The issues set out in the Scott Schedule 6. Directions were given on 21 January 2022. The parties were directed to compile and fill in a Scott Schedule, which they have done.
7. The Scott Schedule identified the relevant issues for determination as follows:
(a) communal lighting (all three years);
(b) fire safety assessment (all three years);
(c) general maintenance (all three years);
(d) roof maintenance (2019/2020 and 2021/2022 only); a
(e) insurance (all three years);
(f) bank charges (all three years);
(g) accounts (all three years);
4
(h) management fee (all three years);
(i) estate gardening (2021/2022 only);
(j) window cleaning (2021/2022 only). The lease 8. The lease of the flat is dated 17 January 2019 (“the lease”). The parties to these proceedings are the original parties to the lease.
9. Paragraph 31 of the fourth schedule to the lease contains a covenant by the respondents to pay the interim charge and the service charge as defined in the seventh schedule.
10. The fifth schedule of the lease contains covenants by the applicant, amongst other things, to insure the house, keep the house in repair and keep the hallway lit.
11. The sixth schedule sets out the items falling within the service charge. These include the matters set out above, as well as the engagement of surveyors or [NAME] to manage the house and the common parts, the engagement of accountants for preparing or auditing the service charge accounts and supplying the necessary certificates, and bank charges incurred in connection with any expenditure forming part of the service charge.
12. The seventh schedule sets out the machinery for collecting the service charge.
13. The respondents are required to pay 50% of the service charges relating to the house. The witnesses 14. Mr [NAME] of the [NAME] gave evidence on behalf of the applicant. Mr [APPELLANT] give evidence on behalf of the respondents. (a) communal lighting (all three years)
15. The communal lighting consists of a single light bulb in the hallway of the house operated from a time lag switch. There is no separate landlord’s supply for the hallway, and the applicant does not pay any [COMPANY] for the electricity supply to the hallway 16. Instead, responsibility for paying this bill lies with the lessee of the ground floor flat whose supply of electricity includes the lighting in the hallway.
5 17. The applicant deems the annual cost of the supply of electricity to hallway at £60.00. It then demands £30.00 from the respondents, and reimburses that sum to the lessee of the ground floor flat.
18. Under this arrangement the applicant is not in our judgment providing any services to the respondents. It is a matter for the lessees to come to an arrangement between themselves as to how the supply of electricity to the hallway is to be divided between themselves.
Accordingly, we do not allow recovery of the sums. (b) fire safety assessment (all three years)
19. The respondents accept the liability to pay £103.50 for the service charge year 2019/2020. We find that the demand for £106.50 for the service charge year 2020/2021 is reasonable.
20. As to the interim demand for £285.00 for the service charge year 2021/2022, we note that none of the previously recommended work has been done, and we consider that there is no need for a further assessment until the work is done. The building consists of two one bedroom flats with very limited common parts. The sum demanded includes the cost of emergency lighting which has not been recommended in either report.
Accordingly, we reduce the amount to £150.00 per flat to allow for the provision of three interlinked alarms. (c) general maintenance (all three years)
21. In the service charge year 2019/2020 we allow £10 for the cutting of keys to the entrance door. We allow the claim for the out of hours managing service in the service charge years 2019/2020 and 2020/2021.
22. We allow the charge of £125.00 on account for repairs in the service charge year 2021/2022. (d) roof maintenance (2019/2020 and 2021/2022 only)
23. This is work properly undertaken by the applicant. We allow the charge of £123.50 for roof maintenance and repairs in the service charge year 2019/2020.
24. We allow the charge of £125.00 on account for roof maintenance and repairs in the service charge year 2021/2022. (e) insurance (all three years)
25. We allow the charge of £206.80 for insurance in the service charge year 2019/2020 (the inclusion by mistake of the demolished garage is of no
6 significance to the amount charged).
26. We allow the charge of £213.42 for insurance in the service charge year 2020/2021.
27. We allow the charge of £225.00 on account for insurance in the service charge year 2021/2022. (f) bank charges (all three years)
28. The applicant is entitled to charge for the cost of a separate bank account. We allow the charge of £45.00 for bank charges in the service charge year 2019/2020.
29. We allow the charge of £45.00 for bank charges in the service charge year 2020/2021.
30. We allow the charge of £45.00 on account for bank charges in the service charge year 2021/2022. (g) accounts (all three years)
31. The applicant is entitled to charge for the cost of the professional preparation of accounts and their certification. We allow the charge of £60.00 for the preparation of accounts in the service charge year 2019/2020.
32. Based on our expertise and experience we consider an annual charge of £300.00 to be reasonable We will allow £300.00 for the preparation of accounts in the service charge year 2020/2021.
33. We similarly allow the charge of £300.00 on account for the preparation of accounts in the service charge year 2021/2022. (h) management fee (all three years)
34. The applicant has failed to disclose any invoices relating to the management fees, nor a copy of the management agreement. We were told by Mr [APPELLANT] that there is a contract between the applicant and the [NAME] for three years, rolling over annually thereafter. There was no consultation process.
35. This agreement appears to be a qualifying long term agreement and the contribution of the tenants is limited under s.20 Landlord and 10 1985. In these circumstances, we allow £100.00 for management fees in the service charge year 2019/2020, £100.00 for management fees in the service charge year 2020/2021, and £100.00 on account for management fees in the service charge year 2021/2022.
7 (i) estate gardening (2021/2022 only)
36. There is a report from [COMPANY] dated 08 June 2022 [191] referring to six visits. There is no evidence of gardening in the service charge years 2019/2020 or 2020/2021. We consider that a reasonable annual cost of the gardening would be £75.00 per flat.
37.
Accordingly, we allow £75.00 on account for gardening in the service charge year 2021/2022. (j) window cleaning (2021/2022 only)
38. We allow £50.00 on account for window cleaning in the service charge year 2021/2022, since the previous years indicate that window cleaning is only carried out the rare intervals and only to the front of the house. Name: [NAME]: 01 November 2022 15 January 2023
Rights of appeal By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
8
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Challenges Service Charges and Legal Costs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Allows Tenant's Challenge to Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal rules on service charges under Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Service Charge Dispute in First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Allows Challenge to Service Charges for Major Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules Service Charges Payable Under Landlord and Tenant…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Tenant's Challenge to Pandemic-era Service Char…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Tenant's Challenge to Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Service Charge Challenge Rejected by First-tier Tribunal
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The court allowed the challenge when the service charges appeared unreasonable.
- The court partially allowed challenges where some aspects of the charges were deemed reasonable.
- The court allowed claims when tenants provided evidence showing discrepancies in charge calculations.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The court dismissed challenges when the service charges were considered reasonable according to the act.
- The court refused claims when tenants failed to provide sufficient evidence of unreasonableness.
- The court rejected challenges when the charges were found to be in line with the terms of the lease agreement.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided on the service charges that tenants must pay to their landlord, ruling on what was reasonable under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Who was involved?
The decision involved tenants and a landlord, with the landlord requesting a determination of service charges.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the reasonableness of each service charge item, ensuring that tenants only pay for reasonable costs.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The court applied section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the reasonableness of each service charge item, especially regarding fire safety assessments and management fees.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was partly for and partly against the landlord, allowing some charges while reducing others.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should review their lease and the reasonableness of service charges before agreeing to pay them.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included lease agreements, service charge breakdowns, and reports on maintenance and safety assessments.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it's highly recommended to consult a solicitor for advice on challenging or defending service charges.
