First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent Increase for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent increase for an assured periodic tenancy by considering market rental values while accounting for any improvements made by the tenant and areas in need of repair.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment that reflects the property's condition and improvements, as per the Housing Act 1988 s.14, taking into account the specific circumstances of this case involving a rent increase notice and the tenant's upgrades.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions. The determination excludes certain factors such as the value changes due to improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to the tenant's failure to comply with the tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent at £1,250 per month, adjusting for the tenant's improvements and disrepair issues.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent increase for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusting market rates for tenant improvements and disrepair. The decision reflects a balance between market value and the impact of tenant contributions.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2023/0066
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 28 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Mr [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 1st Floor City Gate, St. [ADDRESS], Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne And Wear, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £1250 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 29 May 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced Not known
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Not applicable
9. Description of premises Detached House comprising living room dining room kitchen & utility. 4 bedrooms and family bathroom. Garage & [NAME] of Decision 25 August 2023
Page 1 of 5
Case Reference : BIR/00CN/MNR/2023/0066
Property : 28 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Landlord : [COMPANY]
Tenant : [APPELLANT] of Application : An Application for a Determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] of Decision : 17 October 2023
_____________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF REASONS _____________________________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Page 2 of 5
BACKGROUND
1. By way of a notice dated 15 March 2023, Northumberland and [RESPONDENT] (“the Landlord”), sought to increase the rental in respect of 28 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the Property”) to £1,250 per month under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) with effect from 29 May 2023.
2. The tenancy commenced on 25 December 2016 and the rent payable at the time of the notice was £1,125 per month.
3. By an application dated 10 April 2023, [NAME] (“the Tenant”) referred the Notice of increase of rent served by the Landlord to Tribunal.
4. The initial application to the Tribunal included a copy of the Rent Increase Notice and confirmed that the tenant carried out various improvements to the kitchen, bathroom and downstairs WC. It is understood that the tenant does not have a tenancy agreement as she succeeded the tenancy from her father who had lived at the property for 40 years prior.
5. The Tribunal issued its Directions dated 5 June 2023 and listed the case on 25 August 2023 carrying out an inspection on the same day. Neither party requested a hearing.
6. The Tenant and Landlord both completed a Reply Form. Written submissions were also submitted on behalf of the Landlord by [RESPONDENT] Manager.
7. After consideration of the available evidence and the applicable law, the Tribunal determined a rental of £1,250 per month with effect from 29 May 2023.
8. Upon receipt of an email dated 18 September 2023 the Tenant requested the Tribunal provide reasons. These written reasons should therefore be read in conjunction with the Decision of the Tribunal dated 25 August 2023.
THE PROPERTY
9. The Property is in Moseley approximately 3 miles south of Birmingham city centre in an attractive residential area surrounded by large, detached houses.
10. The accommodation briefly comprises a large 2-storey detached house including entrance hall, through living room, dining room, kitchen, utility, pantry, downstairs WC and on the first floor a landing, four double bedrooms and a large family bathroom. Outside there is a large rear garden, driveway and single integral garage.
Page 3 of 5
11. The Tenant has installed the central heating and some radiators and fitted all the carpets and curtains, light fittings and gas fire. In addition, the Tenant has installed a new bathroom, refitted the kitchen with all white goods, replaced the downstairs WC and converted the utility area. The Tenant has also redecorated the back bedroom, decorated the hallway and laid out the garden and patio area.
12. The Landlord has installed the double-glazed windows, fitted a new boiler, replaced the roof tiles and rewired most of the house.
13. The Tribunal noted some areas of disrepair including a crack in the wall in the rear middle bedroom and some wiring that had been left exposed. Outside some of the rainwater pipes and guttering need redecorating. Other than the outstanding matters referred to the Tribunal found the property to be in reasonable condition and decorative order given its age and location.
EVIDENCE
14. The Tribunal received a written submission from the Landlord and from the Tenant a completed Reply Form.
15. The Landlord’s submission refers to three properties that range in value between £2,800 and £1,850 per month. Based on these the Landlord considers the market rental value of the Property to be £1,820 per month but then adjusts this to reflect the various tenant’s improvements and therefore arrives at a net rent of £1,250 per month.
16. No specific comparable evidence was received from the Tenant.
17. Neither the Landlord or Tenant made any further representations.
THE LAW
18. Section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 states:
'(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy -
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the
tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;
Page 4 of 5
(c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the
same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates;...'
'(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded -
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a [NAME]; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant
improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out
was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to the
[NAME] ...
19. The jurisdiction of the Rent Assessment Committee was transferred to the First- tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) from 1st July 2013.
20. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal must determine the rent at which it considers that the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy.
21. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1), must ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant’s improvements as defined in section 14(2) 0f the Act.
VALUATION
22. In reaching its determination, the Tribunal has had regard to the evidence and submissions of the parties, the relevant law and their own knowledge and experience as an expert Tribunal but not any special or secret knowledge.
23. In the first instance, the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. This it determined is £1,800 per month.
24. The Tribunal used its own general knowledge of market rental levels in the [NAME] area and from its own research into rental values for similar types of property from the surrounding areas. The Tribunal has, therefore had regard to the location, accommodation, and condition of the Property.
25. The Tribunal then had regard to the various Tenants’ improvements that have been carried out as referred to above and made a total deduction of £550 per month including the areas of disrepair.
Page 5 of 5
26. Taking all these factors into consideration, the Tribunal was therefore satisfied and concluded that the market rent is £1,250 per month after making the required adjustments under the Act.
27. The rent determined by the Tribunal for the purposes of Section 14 is, therefore, £1,250 per month.
RIGHT OF APPEAL
28. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law only. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
[NAME] (Hons) FRICS
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £2,400/month rent for assured tenancy in Newcastle
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £880 for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £550 Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy in Newcastle
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £225 weekly rent for assured tenancy in Birmingham
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £900/month rent for assured tenancy in Birmingham
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £320/month rent for assured tenancy in Newcastle upon Tyne
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £640/month rent for assured tenancy in Gateshead
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £750/month rent for assured tenancy in Handsworth
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £800 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £800
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £850/month rent for assured tenancy in Birmingham
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £863.50 rent for assured tenancy in Newcastle
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Rent should be set at a reasonable market rate based on comparable properties.
- Rent should reflect current market conditions for similar properties.
- Rent adjustments must consider the condition of the property.
- Landlords are entitled to adjust rents based on statutory provisions.
- Tenants are entitled to rent determinations under the Housing Act 1988.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new monthly rent of £1,250 for the property.
Who was involved?
The landlord sought to increase rent, and the tenant contested it before the First-tier Tribunal.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal reviewed market rental values and adjustments for improvements made by the tenant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was used to determine the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
Market rental value adjusted for tenant improvements and disrepair.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant, as the requested increase was upheld.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Tenants should consider market rates and their contributions when contesting rent increases.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of improvements made by the tenant and comparable rental values were key.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an appeal can be made to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
