VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Grants Certificate to Tenants' Association

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal granted a certificate of recognition to a tenants' association for five years, allowing the association to exercise certain rights concerning the management of the premises.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenants' association is entitled to a certificate of recognition if it meets the criteria set out in the Tenants' Associations Regulations 2018.

Topics

tenants' associationscertificate of recognition

Provisions

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20CTenants' Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018

📖 Technical summary

The First-tier Tribunal granted a certificate of recognition to a tenants' association for five years.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal granted a certificate of recognition to a tenants' association for five years, after determining that the association met the requirements set out in the Tenants' Associations Regulations 2018.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER

(RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference : MAN/00EB/HTA/2023/0001

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent: [redacted] : Application for a certificate of recognition of

a tenants’ [APPELLANT] Landlord and Tenant

Act 1985 – s 20C

Tribunal Member s : [NAME] [NAME] (Chairman)

[NAME] and venue of hearing

: Determined without a hearing

Date of Decision : 04 July 2024

DECISION

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

DECISION The Tribunal grants a certificate of recognition to [APPELLANT] for a period of 5 years.

REASONS Background 1. On 24 August 2023, the Tribunal received an application for a certificate of recognition for [APPELLANT], being a recently established tenants’ [APPELLANT] in relation to Premises known as [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the Premises”).

2. The application was made by Mr [APPELLANT], Secretary of the [APPELLANT], under section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the Act”). The Respondent is [RESPONDENT] [COMPANY], the freehold owner of the Premises (and the landlord under the long leases).

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the Premises, but understands it comprises of 40 flats, 35 of which are let on long leases.

4. The Tribunal issued directions on 7 December 2023. The parties were informed that the application would be determined on the papers unless either party gave notice requiring an oral hearing to be arranged. No such notice was received, and the Tribunal has therefore determined this application upon consideration of the papers supplied by the parties.

Law 5. An [APPELLANT] which is a “recognised tenants’ [APPELLANT]” as defined by section 29(1) of the Act has certain rights concerning the management of the Premises concerned: it has the right:– • to nominate contractors for tender in a statutory consultation process carried out by the landlord under section 20 of the Act; • to be sent copy estimates obtained for the purposes of such a consultation process; • to ask for a summary of costs incurred by a landlord (section 21); • to inspect relevant accounts and receipts for expenditure (section 22); • to ask for a written summary of insurance cover; and • to ask to be consulted about appointment or re-appointment of a managing agent (section 30B).

6. An [APPELLANT] of qualifying tenants may be recognised for these purposes by notice given by the landlord. Alternatively, it may be recognised by a certificate given by the Tribunal under section 29(1)(b)(i) of the Act.

7. In deciding whether to grant a certificate of recognition, the Tribunal must apply the Tenants’ Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018 (“the Regulations”).

8. Regulation 3 lists the following matters to which the Tribunal must have regard when deciding whether to give a certificate of recognition: • the composition of the membership of the tenants’ [APPELLANT]; • the tenants’ [APPELLANT]’s rules regarding membership, including whether tenants who are not qualifying tenants are entitled to become members; • the tenants’ [APPELLANT]’s rules regarding decision making; • the tenants’ [APPELLANT]’s rules regarding voting; • the extent to which any fees or charges payable in connection with membership of the tenants’ [APPELLANT] applies equally to all members; • the extent to which the constitution of the tenants’ [APPELLANT] takes account of the interests of all members; • the extent to which the tenants’ [APPELLANT] is independent of the landlord of the dwellings to which the [APPELLANT] relates; • whether the tenants’ [APPELLANT] has a chairperson, secretary and treasurer; • whether the constitution of the tenants’ [APPELLANT] may be amended by resolution of the members and the rules regarding amendment; • whether the tenants’ [APPELLANT]’s constitution, accounts and list of members are kept up to date; and available for public inspection; and • the extent to which the [APPELLANT] operates in an open and transparent way.

9. Regulation 4 provides that the Tribunal must not give a certificate of recognition in certain circumstances: where the tenants’ [APPELLANT] represents fewer than 50% of the qualifying tenants; where a previous certificate is still in force; and where the Tribunal is not satisfied that the constitution and rules of the tenants’ [APPELLANT] are fair and democratic. Grounds for the application 10. The Applicant’s statement of case provided a detailed a list of reasons of how [APPELLANT] complies with each paragraph of Regulation 3.

11. The Applicant submits that the tenants’ [APPELLANT] has membership from 33 out of the 35 qualifying tenants (being long leaseholders of apartments let on a long leases) plus 2 of the non-qualifying tenants and therefore the residents at the Premises desire a recognised tenants’ [APPELLANT] to represent the majority view of residents on matters of common interest that impact on individuals both financially and on their wellbeing.

Respondent’s Submissions 12. The Respondent responded to the Applicant’s submissions by email from [APPELLANT], Commercial Property Director, on 20 March 2024 stating: It now appears that the Applicant’s Statement of Case (together with the supporting documentation) is compliant with the provisions of Section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and as such the Landlord has no objection to the recognition of the [APPELLANT].

Consideration 15. The Tribunal is advised that leaseholders (qualifying tenants) from 33 of the 40 apartments at the Premises are members of the [APPELLANT]. The applicant has demonstrated written consent from members in all of those 33 apartments (plus 2 others).

16. The landlord has confirmed that it does not object to the recognition of the tenants’ [APPELLANT].

17. The Tribunal is satisfied that there are no circumstances which prevent the Tribunal giving a certificate of recognition in this case. Indeed, having reviewed a copy of the [APPELLANT]’s rules and constitution and having had regard to the matters specified in Regulation 3, the Tribunal is satisfied that it is appropriate to give such a certificate, and that the [APPELLANT] should thereby be recognised under the Act for a period of five years.

First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Residential Property

CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION

An application from [APPELLANT] for a Certificate of Recognition under the provisions of Section 29 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985, as amended by Paragraph 10 of Schedule 2 to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 has been considered by:

[APPELLANT] [NAME] [NAME]

who are persons appointed to act as members of the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber.

This is to certify that

[APPELLANT]

is a Recognised Tenants’ [APPELLANT] for the purpose of the aforementioned Section.

The Certificate will be valid for a period of 5 years commencing on 04 July 2024, unless previously cancelled.

Signed: [NAME] [NAME]

(one of the persons appointed by the Lord Chancellor as a member of the First-tier Tribunal)

Date: 04 July 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenants' association meets the criteria set out in the Tenants' Associations Regulations 2018.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal granted a certificate of recognition to a tenants' association for five years.

Who was involved?

The tenants' association and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant the certificate because the association met the criteria set out in the regulations.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Tenants' Associations Regulations 2018 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The association's compliance with the regulations was the central argument.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenants' association.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can also seek a certificate of recognition if they meet the required criteria.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The association's rules and constitution were important documents.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.