First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
📌 In brief
In this case, a landlord requested permission to bypass certain consultation requirements for urgent repairs needed in a multi-flat building. The First-tier Tribunal granted this permission because the repairs were urgent and no tenants objected.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to dispensation from consultation requirements under s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 where urgent repairs are required and no objections are raised by tenants.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a landlord can apply to a tribunal for permission to skip certain consultation requirements if the tribunal finds it reasonable to do so. The consultation requirements refer to rules set by the Secretary of State that require landlords to consult tenants before making changes or entering into agreements.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 due to urgent repairs needed.
📜 Headnote Official document
The landlord sought dispensation from consultation requirements under s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent repairs needed in a terraced house divided into five flats. The First-tier Tribunal granted the dispensation, noting that all tenants were notified and no objections were received.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AW/LDC/2023/0025 P:REMOTE Property :
8 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant : [redacted] : [NAME] Respondents : [redacted] application (see Appendix)
Representative : Not represented Type of Application : [POSTCODE] Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal Member : Judge F J Silverman MA [NAME] of paper consideration : 16 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 16 May 2023
2
DECISION
REASONS
1. The Applicant seeks a determination of its application for dispensation from the consultation requirements imposed by s. 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
2. The Application to the Tribunal was made on 27 January 2023.
3. Directions were issued by the Tribunal on 24 February 2023.
4. This matter was determined by a paper consideration on 16 May 2023 at which the Tribunal considered the Applicant’s application and accompanying documents.
5. A copy of the Application and Directions issued by the Tribunal had been sent by the Applicant to all Respondents as listed on the Appendix to this Decision asking them to respond and to indicate whether or not they opposed the application. No objections were received by the Tribunal.
6. The property is a terraced house set over 5 floors and currently divided into five self-c0ntained flats. Recent bad weather has resulted in water ingress into flat 5 on the top floor and repairs are needed as a matter of urgency to stop the leak and prevent further damage.
7. Two estimates for the repair work have been obtained both of which exceed the s20 limit. At the date of the application the works had been commenced. All the leaseholders were notified of the application, the scope of the works needed and the details of the two estimates.
8. The leaseholders were also served with a notice of intention under s20.
The Tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 on the grounds that all tenants were notified of the application under s20ZA and no objections were received.
3 9. The Applicant’s representative asks the Tribunal for dispensation in order to be able to effect the repairs as soon as possible. No objections to this application have been received from the tenants.
10. The Tribunal was not asked to inspect the property and in the context of the issues before it did not consider that an inspection of the property would be either necessary or proportionate.
11. The Applicant as landlord, has a repairing obligation in respect of the structure, exterior and common parts of the premises (including mains services) imposed on it by a lease dated 13 April 2004.
12. The Tribunal is being asked to exercise its discretion under s.20ZA of the Act. The wording of s.20ZA is significant. Subs. (1) provides:“Where an application is made to a [leasehold valuation] tribunal for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements” (emphasis added).
13. The Tribunal understands that the purposes of the consultation requirements is to ensure that leaseholders are given the fullest possible opportunity to make observations about the expenditure of money for which they will in part be liable. It appears that the leaseholders have had the opportunity to both propose an alternative contractor and to comment on the estimates received. The Applicant states that there have been no responses from the leaseholders to the notices served.
14. Having considered the submissions made by the Applicant the Tribunal is satisfied that the proposed works are now both urgent and necessary and that no undue prejudice will be caused to or suffered by any tenant by the grant of dispensation under s20ZA.
15. This determination does not affect the tenants’ rights to apply to the Tribunal challenging the payability or reasonableness of the service charges.
Judge F J Silverman as Chairman Date 16 May 2023
Appendix – list of Respondents
FLAT 1- Mr & Mrs [NAME] 2- Mr [NAME] 3- Ms [NAME] & Mr [NAME]
4
FLAT 4- Mr [NAME] 5- Mr [NAME]: Appeals
RIGHTS OF APPEAL 1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL].
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Terms for Collective Enfranchisement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Reasonable Service Charges for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenanc…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation From Consultation Requirements for Major Work…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Repairs Dispensation Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenants Successfully Extend Term of Tribunal-Appointed Manager
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freeholder Granted Permission to Proceed with Urgent Works Without Consulta…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Works are considered urgent and necessary.
- No objections are raised by tenants.
- The works maintain safety and prevent future damage.
- The property management company seeks dispensation under section 20ZA.
- Conditions for dispensation are met without causing undue prejudice.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No applicable factors listed in provided cases)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision allowed the landlord to bypass consultation requirements for urgent repairs.
Who was involved?
The landlord and multiple tenants were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant the dispensation because the repairs were urgent and no objections were raised by the tenants.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 20ZA, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The urgency of the repairs and the lack of objections from tenants were the most important factors.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might also be able to bypass consultation requirements if their repairs are urgent and tenants do not object.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the urgency of the repairs and notices sent to tenants were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
