VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works Due to Damp and Mould

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal granted permission to a landlord to carry out urgent repairs without consulting the tenants first. The repairs were necessary to fix severe damp and mould problems in one of the flats. This decision allows the landlord to proceed with the repairs immediately.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord may be dispensed from consultation requirements if the works are urgent and necessary to address severe damp and mould issues.

Topics

tenancy disputesurgent worksdispensation from consultation

Provisions

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

The appropriate tribunal can grant a request to waive consultation requirements for certain works or long-term agreements if it finds it reasonable to do so.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent works due to severe damp and mould.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent works addressing severe damp and mould issues in a multi-flat property. The works were deemed necessary and urgent, thus justifying the dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1. Judge Adrian Jack made the determination on April 22, 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AG/LDC/2024/0027 Property : 19 Frognal, Hampstead [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [COUNSEL] of [COMPANY] Respondents : [redacted] Representative : No appearance Type of application : Application for a dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of major works Tribunal : Judge Adrian Jack, Tribunal Member J Mann MCIEH Date of paper determination : 22nd April 2024

DECISION

The application, the property, the works and the law 1. The applicant by an application dated 16th January 2024 applies for dispensation pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of major works totalling £3,575.04. The property comprises 13 flats.

2. The Tribunal gave directions on 27th February 2024. The tenants have not complied with the directions and appear to raise no objection to the landlord’s application. No request for an oral hearing was made by any party, so the Tribunal has determined this matter on the papers.

3. The landlord says that within Flat 1 there was severe damp and mould due to shingle and stones being piled up on the outside of the building.

2 This covered the damp course, which impacted the ventilation within the property. It was then uninhabitable by the tenant living within and, as such, extensive works were carried out to clear the impacted wall and re- plaster and re-decorate. The works were urgent due to the mould and damp.

4. Section 20ZA(1) of the 1985 Act provides: “Where an application is made to the appropriate tribunal [in England, this Tribunal] for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements.” 5. An important consideration is always whether granting dispensation will cause prejudice to the tenants. In our judgment, on the facts of this case there is no prejudice to the tenants. The works were urgent.

6. In our judgment it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements in this case.

7. This dispensation does not mean that the tenants cannot challenge the cost or quality of the work done. It simply dispenses with the consultation requirement.

8. There is no application in respect of the fees for applying to the Tribunal, so we make no order in respect of such fees.

DETERMINATION a) The Tribunal grants a dispensation pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the works the subject of the application. b) The Tribunal makes no order in respect of the fees payable to the Tribunal.

Name: Judge Adrian Jack Date: 22nd April 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The works were urgent due to severe damp and mould in one of the flats.
  • The damp and mould made the flat uninhabitable for the tenant.
  • The tenants did not object to the landlord's application for dispensation.
  • Granting dispensation would not cause prejudice to the tenants.
  • The Tribunal found it reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to grant dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent works addressing severe damp and mould issues.

Who was involved?

The landlord applied for dispensation, and the tenants were the respondents.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant the dispensation because the works were urgent and necessary to address severe damp and mould issues.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically Section 20ZA, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the works were urgent and necessary to address severe damp and mould issues.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might also be able to obtain dispensation from consultation requirements if their works are urgent and necessary to address severe issues.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the severity of the damp and mould issues and the urgency of the works likely mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.