First-tier Tribunal Grants Fire Safety Works Dispensation
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted permission to a landlord to skip the usual consultation process for urgent fire safety works. The decision was made because the works were deemed urgent and necessary, and no tenants objected to the application.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may be dispensed from consultation requirements under s.20ZA if the works are urgent and necessary, and no undue prejudice will be caused to tenants.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a landlord can apply to a tribunal for permission to skip consultation requirements related to certain works or long-term agreements if the tribunal finds it reasonable to do so. The consultation requirements themselves are defined by regulations set by the Secretary of State.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent fire safety works.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent fire safety works. The decision was based on the urgency and necessity of the works and the lack of objections from tenants.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BB/LDC/2020/0161 P:REMOTE Property : 1-34 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] [APPELLANT] :
Respondents : [redacted] application
Representative : Not represented Type of Application : [POSTCODE] Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal Member : Judge F J Silverman MA LLM
Date of paper consideration : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 10 November 2020
2
DECISION
REASONS
1. The Applicant seeks a determination of its application for dispensation from the consultation requirements imposed by s. 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
2. The Application to the Tribunal was made on 30 September 2020.
3. Directions were issued by the Tribunal on 06 October 2020.
4. This matter was determined by a paper consideration on 10 November 2020 at which the Tribunal considered the Applicant’s application and accompanying documents.
5. A copy of the Application and Directions issued by the Tribunal had been sent by the Applicant to all Respondents asking them to respond and to indicate whether or not they opposed the application. No objections were received by the Tribunal.
6. An external façade report carried out on 26 August 2020 concluded that the property, comprising an 8 storey block of flats over 18m in height and fitted with cladding to its external walls, was unlikely to meet BS8414-2 (fire risk)standards and that urgent remediation work was required.
7. The Applicant has already commenced a s20 consultation process but asks the Tribunal for dispensation in order obtain estimates in time to meet the government’s deadline for applications for funding.
8. The Tribunal was not asked to inspect the property and in the context of the issues before it did not consider that an inspection of the property would be either necessary or proportionate.
The Tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 on the grounds that all tenants were notified of the application under s20ZA and no objections were received.
3
9. The Applicant has a repairing obligation in respect of the structure, exterior and common parts of the premises (including mains services) imposed on it by a lease dated 17 June 1982. 10. The Tribunal is being asked to exercise its discretion under s.20ZA of the Act. The wording of s.20ZA is significant. Subs. (1) provides:
“Where an application is made to a [leasehold valuation] tribunal for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements” (emphasis added).
11. The Tribunal understands that the purposes of the consultation requirements is to ensure that leaseholders are given the fullest possible opportunity to make observations about expenditure of money for which they will in part be liable.
12. Having considered the submissions made by the Applicant the Tribunal is satisfied that the proposed works are both urgent and necessary and that no undue prejudice will be caused to or suffered by any tenant by the grant of dispensation under s20ZA.
13. This determination does not affect the tenants’ rights to apply to the Tribunal challenging the payability or reasonableness of the service charges.
Judge F J Silverman as Chairman Date 10 November 2020
Note: Appeals
RIGHTS OF APPEAL 1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL].
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Repairs Dispensation Under s.20ZA
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Ventilation System Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation from Consultation Requirem…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fire Safety Works Approved Without Tenant Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission for Urgent Repairs Without Full Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Fire Safety Works Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Lift Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety Works
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal was satisfied that the proposed works were both urgent and necessary.
- No undue prejudice would be caused to any tenant by granting the dispensation.
- All tenants were notified of the application for dispensation under the relevant section of the Act.
- An external façade report indicated that the property was unlikely to meet fire risk standards and required urgent remediation.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent fire safety works.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenants of the property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant dispensation because the works were urgent and necessary, and no tenants objected.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically sections 20 and 20ZA.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The urgency and necessity of the fire safety works were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to get dispensation if their works are urgent and necessary.
What evidence or documents mattered?
An external façade report that concluded the property was unlikely to meet fire safety standards was crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, but permission to appeal must be sought from the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it's always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
