Landlord Granted Permission for Urgent Repairs Without Full Consultation
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted a landlord permission to bypass full consultation requirements for urgent repairs to faulty automatic gates at a multi-unit residential property. The repairs were necessary for the safety and security of the residents, and no objections were raised by the tenants.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to dispensation from consultation requirements under s.20ZA where works are urgent and necessary and no objections are received.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a landlord can apply to a tribunal for permission to bypass consultation requirements if the tribunal finds it reasonable to do so. The consultation requirements refer to rules set by the Secretary of State regarding providing information to tenants about proposed works or agreements, obtaining estimates, inviting tenant suggestions, considering tenant feedback, and giving reasons for certain actions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent repairs to automatic gates.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent repairs to faulty automatic gates at a multi-unit residential property. The repairs were deemed necessary and urgent, and no objections were received from the tenants.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2020
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AX /LDC/2019/0208 Property : 43-[ADDRESS] upon Thames Surrey [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [NAME] Respondents : [redacted] application Representative : Not represented Type of Application : [POSTCODE] Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal Member : Judge F J Silverman Dip Fr [NAME] of paper consideration : 21 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 21 January 2020
2
DECISION
REASONS
1. The Applicant landlord, through its management company seeks a determination of its application for dispensation from the consultation requirements imposed by s. 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
2. The Application to the Tribunal was made on 26 November 2019.
3. Directions were issued by the Tribunal on 11 December 2019.
4. This matter was determined by a paper consideration at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] on 21 January 2020 at which the Tribunal considered the Applicant’s application and accompanying documents including a bundle of documents prepared on behalf of the Applicant.
5. The Directions issued by the Tribunal on 11 December 2019 had been sent by the Applicant to all Respondents asking them to respond and to indicate whether or not they opposed the application. No objections were received by the Tribunal. 6. 43-[ADDRESS] (the property) comprises two former houses currently converted and used as six flats and a commercial unit together with six parking spaces and a shared gated entrance drive. The Applicant is the landlord and is acting through its representative, the management company responsible for the maintenance of the property. The flats are held on long leases by the Respondents named in this application.
7. The Tribunal was not asked to inspect the property and in the context of the issues before it did not consider that an inspection of the property would be either necessary or proportionate.
1 The Tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by s.20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 on the grounds that all tenants were notified of the application under s20ZA and no objection was received.
3 8. The Applicant has a repairing obligation in respect of the structure, exterior and common parts of the premises imposed on it by a deed dated 16 May 2003.
9. The automatic gates serving the entrance to the property developed a a fault and no longer open and shut as required. The proper operation of the gates is necessary to ensure the safety and security of the residents on a busy road. The cost of repairs exceeds the £250 per flat limit under the Landlord and Tenant Act and therefore in order to be able to effect the repairs quickly dispensation from the full consultation requirements has been sought by the Applicant.
10. A notice of intention to carry out the proposed works was sent to the Respondent tenants on 26 November 2019. No objections were received. 11. The Tribunal is being asked to exercise its discretion under s.20ZA of the Act. The wording of s.20ZA is significant. Subs. (1) provides:
“Where an application is made to a [leasehold valuation] tribunal for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements (emphasis added).”
12. The Tribunal understands that the purposes of the consultation requirements is to ensure that leaseholders are given the fullest possible opportunity to make observations about expenditure of money for which they will in part be liable.
13. Having considered the submissions made by the both parties the Tribunal is satisfied the proposed works are both necessary and urgent and that in the absence of any objections from the Respondents, it is permissible for them to exercise their discretion in the Applicant’s favour.
14. The granting of dispensation does not affect the Respondents’ rights to challenge the costs or quality of the completed works under s27A Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
Judge F J Silverman as Chairman Date 21. January 2020
Note: Appeals
4 1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Repairs Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Lift Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Conditional Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety …
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Terms for Collective Enfranchisement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Premium for Tenant's Lease Extension
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord's application for dispensation was allowed because all tenants were notified and no objections were received.
- The proposed repair works were considered necessary and urgent by the Tribunal.
- The automatic gates at the property entrance were faulty and needed repair to ensure resident safety and security.
- The cost of repairs exceeded the £250 per flat limit, requiring dispensation for quick repairs.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision allowed the landlord to bypass the full consultation process for urgent repairs to faulty automatic gates.
Who was involved?
The landlord and multiple tenants were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant dispensation because the repairs were urgent and necessary, and no objections were received from the tenants.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 sections 20, 20ZA, and 27A were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the repairs were urgent and necessary, and no objections were received from the tenants.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to bypass the full consultation process if the repairs are urgent and necessary, and no objections are received from the tenants.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the urgency and necessity of the repairs, and confirmation that no objections were received from the tenants mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving legal disputes over repairs and consultation requirements.
