VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Decision — Case 4149595

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £775, which includes some costs but excludes others like water rates and council tax.

⚖️ Legal holding

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows for the determination of rent for assured periodic tenancies, specifically setting the monthly rent at £775 in this case.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination takes into account the type of tenancy, the start date, and the terms of the existing tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £775 per month, effective from 13 June 2024.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £775 per month, effective from June 13, 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/47UD/MNR/2024/0079

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 36 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge P. [NAME]

Landlord [NAME] [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: 775 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13 June 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable - Per -

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 13 November 2022

5. Length of the term or rental period Statutory Periodic Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A

8. Description of premises 3 bedroom mid-terrace. 2 reception rooms. Kitchen and bathroom on ground floor. Rear garden.

Chairman Judge P. Ellis Date of Decision 24 June 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £775, effective from June 13, 2024.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the appropriate rent amount for a three-bedroom mid-terrace property.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £775 per month, as required by the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of statutory guidelines for setting rent under an assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, likely the tenant seeking a fair rent assessment.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to statutory guidelines, ensuring fairness and compliance with legal standards.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.