VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Reduces Tenant's Liability for Litigation Costs

Case No.

📌 In brief

In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal decided to reduce the amount a tenant must pay for administration charges related to legal disputes. The decision was based on the fact that neither party fully succeeded in their claims.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their liability to pay administration charges in respect of litigation costs reduced if neither party is wholly successful.

Topics

administration chargeslitigation costsservice charge

Provisions

Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 s.11 para 5A

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal reduced the administration charges recoverable via the service charge to not more than half.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal reduced the administration charges recoverable via the service charge to not more than half, finding that neither party was wholly successful and considering the property's self-management structure.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BK/LSC/2022/0313 Property : 58 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Representative : Mr [COUNSEL] counsel instructed by [NAME], Solicitors Respondent : [redacted] Mrs [COUNSEL] (2) Representative : Mr [COUNSEL] in person for himself and Mrs [COUNSEL] of [NAME] : Para 5A Schedule 11 Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] and Venue of hearing : 3 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 31 August 2023

DECISION

2

1. Following the issuing of the Tribunals decision of 10 April 2023, the respondent, acting through counsel, made an [NAME] dated 9 May 2023 for an order under Para 5A Schedule 11 Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, to reduce or extinguishing the tenant’s liability to pay a particular administration charge in respect of litigation costs.

2. Taking into account the determinations in the decision of 10 April 2023 as amended on 31 August 2023, the Tribunal determines that an order be made that not more than half the applicant’s administration charges in respect of litigation costs may be recovered via the service charge.

3. The reasons are (i) neither party has been wholly successful. Although the amount found payable of £259.74 was small compared to the initial claim of £5,560.24 (reduced by Judge Pittaway to £4,497.36 in October 2022) the applicant had been entitled to £259.74 since November 2022 and that amount was admitted in the appeal application1 (ii) there was no evidence of any offer by the respondent to settle this action (iii) the property is a self-managed block owned by the [NAME] and (iv) even a successful party can have no expectation of a s. 20C order Tenants of [ADDRESS] v Doren Limited [2001] 3WLUK 935, which by parity of reasoning the Tribunal considers applies equally to this [NAME]. Name: Mr [NAME]: 31 August 2023 Rights of appeal By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case

1 Para 29

3

number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant's liability for administration charges related to litigation costs was reduced because neither party was entirely successful.
  • The tribunal considered that the property is self-managed, which influenced the decision on reducing the charge.
  • There was no evidence of any settlement offer made by the respondent, impacting the reduction of the charge.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The initial claim amount of £5,560.24 and its reduced form of £4,497.36 did not support a full recovery of administration charges for litigation costs.
  • The tenant's partial success since November 2022 was acknowledged but did not justify the full payment of the disputed charge.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to reduce the amount a tenant must pay for administration charges related to legal disputes to not more than half.

Who was involved?

The case involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the tenant's liability should be reduced because neither party was wholly successful in their claims.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that neither party was wholly successful in their claims.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might also be able to have their liability for administration charges reduced if they can show that neither party was wholly successful.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence showing the success of each party's claims was important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.