VadeLab
Struck OutFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Rejects Recognition of Freeholder Residents' Association

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) recently rejected an application for recognition of a residents' association because the association's members owned their homes outright (freeholds) rather than renting them. The tribunal concluded it did not have the authority to grant such recognition under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tribunal does not have jurisdiction to grant a certificate of recognition to a residents' association where its members are freeholders.

Topics

tenancy recognitionfreehold propertiesjurisdiction

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.29

A recognized tenants' association is defined as an association of qualifying tenants (which can include other types of tenants) that is officially recognized by a written notice from the landlord or by a certificate from the First-tier Tribunal for dwellings in England.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal lacks jurisdiction to recognise a residents' association where members are freeholders.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided it did not have jurisdiction to grant a certificate of recognition to a residents' association where all members were freeholders. The decision was based on the fact that the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 does not apply to freehold properties.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Struck Out

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CAM/38UD/HTA/2023/0002 Property : Gardeners Copse, Sonning Common, Reading, Oxfordshire, [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

[COMPANY] [APPELLANT] (Secretary) Respondents

: [redacted] : Recognition of a Residents Association

Tribunal member(s)

:

[NAME] [NAME](Hons)

Date of decision : 22 February 2024

DECISION

Decision: The application is struck out on the grounds that the tribunal does not have jurisdiction to grant a certificate of recognition of the applicant residents’ association.

2 Reasons Background 1. On 15 April 2023 Ms [APPELLANT] on behalf of the Applicant applied to the Tribunal for a certificate of recognition for the Association under section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 as amended (“the Act”). The application was accompanied by meeting minutes and whilst, it stated it was accompanied by a copy of the rules and constitution, it does not appear to have one attached.

2. The resident’s association has been formed for a development 7 freehold houses.

3. All occupiers are members of the association.

4. The Tribunal wrote to the Respondent on 1 August 2023 enclosing the application and seeking their views. The Tribunal received their reply on 7 August 2023

5. They said that in the normal course of business they had no issue recognising a tenant’s association. However, the provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 did not apply to this development as it consisted of seven freehold houses. They attached a copy of the transfer for the Tribunal’s information. There were no leaseholders on this development to whom the provisions of the act applied. In the circumstances they did not believe the tribunal had jurisdiction to grant a Certificate of Recognition.

6. The tribunal wrote to the Applicant on 12 September 2023 explaining that they could not issue a certificate of recognition as they could only do so where there were the required number of qualifying tenants. A qualifying tenant being someone who may be required under the terms of his or her lease to contribute to the same costs by way of a service charge.

7. The Applicant responded to say that they were obliged to pay a service charge of around £1600 per household and it did not seem reasonable that the landlord could bill them and spend these funds in any way that they deemed fit.

8. The tribunal responded to say that it did not have jurisdiction to recognise an association where the members were freeholders and intended to strike out the application.

9. The Applicant responded on 4 October 2023 to say that they had spoken to the [NAME] and their opinion was that, even though they own the freehold to their properties they had a lease with regards to the development their properties were built on. Under the terms of the lease they were advised that they qualified under section 29 Landlord and Tenant Act .

3

The Law

10. The relevant provision of the Act, section 29, provides that a recognised tenants’ association is an association recognised for the purposes of the provisions of the Act relating to service charges paid by leaseholders either by a notice in writing given by the landlord to the secretary of the association or by a certificate from this Tribunal. The Tribunal’s decision 11. The Tribunal has asked for a copy of the lease which the Applicants say they hold and has been directed to the TP1 (Land Registry – Transfer of title) form in respect of one of the properties which refers in Part B (1) to Maintenance Obligations Expenses and Administration of the Maintained Areas.

12. The Tribunal, having examined this, is not satisfied that the Applicants are ‘qualifying tenants’ and therefore it does not have jurisdiction to issue a Certificate of Recognition of the Applicant under the Act.

13. The application is therefore struck out.

[NAME] [NAME](Hons) [NAME]

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

4 The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Annex 1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (PROPERTY CHAMBER) RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY EASTERN REGION _______________________________

CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION OF A TENANTS' ASSOCIATION UNDER SECTION 29 OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985, AS AMENDED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF SCHEDULE 2 TO THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1987

I hereby certify that [COMPANY] is recognised as an association of tenants of the properties [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] for the purposes of Sections 18-30 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. This certificate is granted for a period of four years ending on 20 August 2027 unless previously cancelled.

Signed: ……..………….................................

(one of the persons appointed by the

Lord Chancellor as a member of the

First-tier Tribunal)

Dated: 21 August 2023

5

To: Secretary of Residents Association – [RESPONDENT]

Landlord – [RESPONDENT]

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal decided it did not have the authority to grant a certificate of recognition to a residents' association where all members were freeholders.

Who was involved?

The case involved a residents' association and a developer of a housing estate.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the certificate because the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 does not apply to freehold properties.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 29, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the residents' association members were freeholders, not leaseholders, and thus the Act did not apply.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider whether their circumstances fall under the jurisdiction of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Minutes of meetings and copies of the rules and constitution were submitted, but the lack of applicability of the Act to freeholders was the critical factor.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving legal matters.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.