VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Residents' Association Recognised by First-tier Tribunal for Five Years

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal recognised a a person' association for a period of five years, ensuring that the association meets the criteria outlined in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

⚖️ Legal holding

Under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, as amended, a tenants' association can be recognized by a certificate issued by the First-tier Tribunal.

Topics

tenancy associationcertificate of recognitionLandlord and Tenant Act 1985

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.29

A recognized tenants' association is defined as an association of qualifying tenants (which can include other types of tenants) that is acknowledged either through a written notice from the landlord to the association's secretary or through a certificate issued by the First-tier Tribunal for properties in England.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

A tenants' association was granted a certificate of recognition for a period of four years under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal granted a certificate of recognition to a residents' association for a period of five years, noting that the association's constitution and membership complied with the requirements set forth in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CAM/22UJ/MNR/2023/0058 Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant

Representative

:

: [COMPANY]

[NAME] (Secretary - Respondents

: [redacted] : Recognition of a [NAME] Association

Tribunal member(s)

:

[NAME](Hons)

Date of decision : 21 August 2023

DECISION

Decision: The tribunal grounds the certificate of recognition of the applicants [COMPANY] for a period of five years commencing on the date of this decision

2 Reasons Background 1. On 12 January 2023 Ms [APPELLANT] on behalf of the Applicant applied to the Tribunal for a certificate of recognition for the Association under section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 as amended (“the Act”). The application was accompanied by a copy of the constitution of the Association signed by lessees as members of the [COMPANY] and accompanied by meeting minutes and a document detailing other relevant information. Whilst the application indicated that the Respondent was content to accept the [COMPANY], the association sought a certificate of recognition to assist with their dealings with them and in particular because the landlord had issued a Section 20 major works notice and the managing agents were not recognising the [COMPANY].

2. The [COMPANY] has been formed for a development of some 20 leasehold flats. All but three of the occupiers are members of the association.

3. The Tribunal wrote to the Respondent on 6 March 2023 enclosing the application and seeking their views. The Tribunal received their reply on 16 March 2023 in which they said that they had no objection and had notified the [NAME] accordingly

4. They said that they had not received the [NAME]’ letter of 21 November 2022 requesting recognition and once they were made aware had confirmed their acceptance.

The Law 5. The relevant provision of the Act, section 29, provides that a recognised [COMPANY], as this [COMPANY] would be, is an association recognised for the purposes of the provisions of the Act relating to service charges either by a notice in writing given by the landlord to the secretary of the association or by a certificate from this Tribunal. There are various related provisions that are not relevant to this application.

The Tribunals decision 6. The Tribunal is satisfied that a certificate of recognition of the Applicant under the Act should be issued. It is the Association that is being recognised and the constitution and membership of this Association complies with what the Tribunal would expect to see in a recognised [COMPANY] under the Act.

7. No representations have been made as to the duration of the

3 certificate. The Act gives the Tribunal discretion as to the period for which a certificate is granted and contains no specific factors to be taken account of.

8. The Tribunal notes that there is no objection to the recognition of the association, indeed one of the main parties with an interest appears to be entirely content with the recognition of the association.

9. A certificate of recognition for the period of four years from today’s date is attached at Annex 1.

[NAME](Hons) Regional Surveyor

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

4 Annex 1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (PROPERTY CHAMBER) RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY EASTERN REGION _______________________________

CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION OF A TENANTS' ASSOCIATION UNDER SECTION 29 OF THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985, AS AMENDED BY PARAGRAPH 10 OF SCHEDULE 2 TO THE LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1987

I hereby certify that [COMPANY] is recognised as an association of tenants of the properties [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] for the purposes of Sections 18-30 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. This certificate is granted for a period of four years ending on 20 August 2027 unless previously cancelled.

Signed: [NAME] ……..………….................................

(one of the persons appointed by the

Lord Chancellor as a member of the

First-tier Tribunal)

Dated: 21 August 2023

To: Secretary of [NAME] Association – [RESPONDENT]

Landlord – [NAME] [RESPONDENT]

5

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The association's constitution and membership comply with the statutory requirements.
  • The association seeks recognition through the proper channels as defined by law.
  • The association meets the criteria set out in the Tenants’ Associations Regulations 2018.
  • The association is seeking recognition under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
  • The association is composed of tenants rather than freeholders.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The association includes members who are freeholders, not tenants.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to grant a certificate of recognition to a residents' association for five years.

Who was involved?

The residents' association and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant the certificate because the association's constitution and membership met the legal requirements.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the association's constitution and membership complied with the legal requirements.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek recognition from the First-tier Tribunal if their association meets the legal requirements.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The constitution of the association, meeting minutes, and a document detailing other relevant information mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.