VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £1,050 Per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £1,050 per month for a residential property. They took into account the lease terms and the quality of furnishings provided by the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination based on comparable evidence and adjustments for lease terms and furnishings.

Topics

tenancy disputesfair rent determination

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £1,050 per calendar month after considering various factors affecting the rental value.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £1,050 per calendar month for a residential property, considering comparable evidence and making adjustments for lease terms and furnishings. The decision was made by Mr O Dowty MRICS on 6 February 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference

: HS/LON/00AP/F77/2023/0395

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [NAME]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] : [COMPANY] of Objection : 6 November 2023

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 6 February 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £1,050 per calendar month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 5 February 2024, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. Following an objection from the tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 3. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the open market rent for the property would be in the region of £1,500 per calendar month, were it let in the condition and on the terms usual for such a letting. From this level of rent the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to:

• The lease terms of the tenancy being less attractive to a potential tenant than those which are generally expected in the market as regards internal decoration • The Tenant’s provision of white goods, floor coverings, curtains and other similar furnishings

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,050 per calendar month.

3

Decision 8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £1,050 per calendar month. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £1,201.50 per calendar month. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £1,050 per calendar month is to be registered as the fair rent or this property.

Chairman: [NAME]: 6 February 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AP/F77/2023/0395

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] , [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The fair rent is £1,050 Per Cal Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 5 February 2024

3. The amount for services is N/A Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £1,201.50 per calendar month prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 5 February 2024

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 379

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 317.7

X 379 Minus Y 317.7 = (A) 61.3

(A) 61.3 Divided by Y 317.7 = (B) 0.192949

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.242949

Last registered rent* £966.50 Multiplied by (C) = £1,201.31 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £1,201.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services N/A

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1,201.50 Per Cal Month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined a fair rent by considering comparable evidence and its own expert knowledge of rental values.
  • The fair rent was adjusted downwards because the lease terms for internal decoration were less attractive than market expectations.
  • The tenant providing white goods, floor coverings, and curtains led to a downward adjustment in the fair rent.
  • An adjustment was made for scarcity in the rental market.
  • The registered fair rent was the lower uncapped rent determined by the Tribunal, as it was below the maximum capped rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £1,050 per calendar month for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered comparable evidence and adjusted the rent based on lease terms and the tenant's provision of furnishings.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the lease terms and the quality of furnishings provided by the tenant was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower fair rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might benefit from having comparable evidence and making adjustments for lease terms and furnishings.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both parties and the Tribunal's own expert knowledge of rental values in the area mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed, but the details of how to do so are provided in the full reasons.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.