First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £117 per Week
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £117 per week for a property in Milton Keynes, considering factors like the property's condition and current market conditions.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions and the state of repair of the property.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined a fair rent of £117 per week for a property in Milton Keynes.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent of £117 per week for a property in Milton Keynes, taking into account the property's condition and market conditions.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CAM/00MG/F77/2022/0025 HMCTS code : P:PAPERREMOTE Property : 33 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant (Tenant)
: Mr [APPELLANT]
Respondent (Landlord) : [NAME] of [NAME] : Determination of a fair rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal members : [NAME]([NAME])
Date of decision : 4 January 2023
DECISION
Description of hearing This has been a remote determination on the papers which the parties are taken to have consented to, as explained below. The documents that I was referred to are as submitted by the Applicant and the Respondent. I have noted the contents and my decision is below.
2
Decision The tribunal determined a fair rent of £117 per week
Reasons Background
1. On 8 July 2022 the landlord made an [NAME] to register the rent of the property at £89.88 per week inclusive of services of £15.19 per week.
2. On 7 July 2022 the Rent Officer registered a Fair Rent of £121.50 per week with effect from 1 September 2022 inclusive of services of £15.19 per week. This was the capped rent. The uncapped rent being £125 per week.
3. This was in lieu of the previous registered rent of £96.50 per week from 6 August 2020 inclusive of services of £13.20 per week.
4. The Tenant objected, and the matter was referred to the First Tier Tribunal, Property Chamber.
5. The Tribunal issued directions on 23 September 2022. Parties were requested to complete a pro forma supplying details of the accommodation on a room- by-room basis, the features of the property (central heating, white goods, double glazing, carpets and curtains) and other property attributes and any further comments that they may wish the tribunal to take into consideration. This could include any repairs and improvements that had been made, any comments on the condition of the property and rentals of similar properties – should they wish to rely on these.
The property 6. The tribunal decided not to inspect the property but had access to internet viewing applications and the property details supplied by the tenant.
7. The Property is a ground floor self-contained purpose built flat, one of 53 built in the 1970’s. There is off street parking.
8. The accommodation comprises a living room, kitchen small bedroom and bathroom. The property has central heating and double glazing. The law
9. The relevant law is set out in section 70 of the 1977 Act and the MFR Order. We are to have regard to all the circumstances (other than personal
3 circumstances) and in particular to the age, character, locality and state of repair of the Property. We are to disregard the effect on the rental value of any improvements carried out by the tenant (other than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy). We are also required (by s.70(2)) to assume that the demand for similar rented properties in the locality does not significantly exceed the supply of such properties for rent; in effect, if such scarcity exists, we are to adjust the rental figure so that the fair rent is not affected by it.
10. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92, the Court of Appeal confirmed that for the purposes of determining the market rent (before [NAME] any necessary adjustments), open market assured tenancy rents are usually appropriate comparables.
11. By section 72 of the 1977 Act, if the rent is determined by the tribunal, the registration of the rent takes effect from the date we make our decision.
Representations – landlord
12. No representations were received from the landlord.
Representations – tenant
13. The tenant provided dimensions of the room and said that they had provided the carpets and curtains and white goods. The property was small with the bedroom only 11ft x 7ft and they felt that the rent increase was excessive –and felt that it should be £89.88 per week. They felt that the increase must be an error.
Determination
14. First, we need to determine the rent which the landlord could reasonably expect to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms now usual for open market lettings.
15. Neither party has supplied comparables. The Rent Officer determined an open market rent of £150 per week for a property of the standard normally let in the market. The tribunal is of the opinion that this is a reasonable estimate of the open market letting value of this flat.
16. We then need to adjust this open market rent to reflect that the landlord has not provided carpets, curtains and white goods and to allow for their internal repairing obligations.
17. For this the tribunal has made an adjustment of £20 to arrive at a rent before consideration of scarcity of £130.
4 18. We then considered whether there should be an adjustment for “scarcity” as referred to in paragraph 13 and decided that there should be an adjustment of 10%. This results in a rent of £117 per week.
19. The provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 require that the registered rent is either the capped Fair Rent, details of which are attached to the decision notice, or the Fair Rent decided by the Tribunal whichever is the lower.
20. The capped rent is £124.69 per week. This is higher than the rent assessed by the Tribunal as set out above and therefore, the rent determined by the tribunal of £117.00 per week is to be registered.
21. This is the maximum rent that the landlord can charge – they are able to charge less, and the tenant should talk to the landlord to ascertain what the rent payable will be.
Name: [NAME]([NAME]) Date: 4 January 2023
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent to £96.50 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £800 per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent reflecting current market conditions.
- The property's state of repair is considered in determining the fair rent.
- Improvements made by the tenant are disregarded when calculating fair rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's improvements to the property are considered when determining fair rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal set a fair rent of £117 per week for a property in Milton Keynes.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the fair rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the current market conditions and the state of repair of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 sections 70 and 72 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the current market conditions and the property's state of repair.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent of £117 per week.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the current market conditions and the state of repair of their property when disputing a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The dimensions of the rooms, the property's condition, and comparable properties were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
