First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £530 per month for a property in Bournemouth. The decision took into account the property's condition, location, and the lack of certain amenities like central heating and double glazing.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions and the state of repair of the property.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the property's condition and location.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £530 per month for a property located in Bournemouth, taking into account the property's condition, location, and the absence of modern amenities such as central heating and double glazing.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HN/F77/2022/0030
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Top Flat (Flat 3), 15 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £530.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 03 August 2022
3. The amount for services is £67.40 Per Calendar Month
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
not applicable
5. The rent is to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £618.40 per Calendar Month including £67.40 per Calendar Month for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 3 August 2022
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 340.0
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 292.7
X 340.0 Minus Y 292.7 = (A) 47.3
(A) 47.3 Divided by Y 292.7 = (B) 0.1616
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.2116
Last registered rent* £454.45 Multiplied by (C) = 550.61 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £551.00
Variable service charge YES If YES add amount for services £67.40
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £618.40 Per Calendar Month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HN/F77/2022/0030 Property : Top Flat (Flat 3) 15 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] :
[APPELLANT]
Tenant : Miss M [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :
Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Determined on the papers
Date of Decision
:
3rd August 2022
DECISION
CHI/00HN/F77/2022/0030
2
Summary of Decision
On 3rd August 2022 the Tribunal determined a fair rent of £530 per month with effect from 3rd August 2022.
Background
1. On 24th March 2022 the Landlord’s Agent applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £530 per month including £67.40 per month in respect of services.
2. The rent was previously registered on the 24th June 2020 at £467 per month including £12.55 per month for services following a determination by the Rent Officer. This equates to a net rent element of £454.45 per month.
3. The rent was registered by the Rent Officer on the 27th May 2022 at a figure of £525 per month with effect from the 24th June 2022. This includes the sum of £67.40 per month in respect of services. The net rental element is £458 per month.
4. By a letter dated 14th June 2022 the Tenant objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to the First Tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property) formerly a Rent Assessment Committee.
5. The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and of Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.
6. The Tribunal office issued Directions on 4th July 2022 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent on the basis of written representations subject to the parties requesting an oral hearing. No request was made by the parties for a hearing.
7. The Tribunal office informed the parties that the Tribunal might also consider information about the property available on the internet.
8. The parties were invited to include photographs and video within their representations if they so wished. Representations were made which were copied to both parties.
The Property 9. From the information available the Property comprises a third floor converted flat situated above commercial properties within the commercial centre of Bournemouth, a few hundred yards from the main beach.
CHI/00HN/F77/2022/0030
3 10. The accommodation includes two rooms, a kitchen and a bathroom with WC. There is no central heating, outside space or parking.
Evidence and Representations
11. The Rent Officer held a telephone consultation with the Parties on 5th May 2022. The Tenant stated that there are 65 steps up to her front door, there is some rain penetration to her bathroom through the roof which causes black mould growth, and that the building management agent SPL is billing for some services that are not performed.
12. The main issue raised by the Tenant was in respect of the service charge element of the rent which has risen considerably in recent years. The Rent Officer had considered the calculation of the charge and had concluded that it was reasonable.
13. The Tribunal were provided with the Rent Officer calculation sheet which suggested a full open market rent of £675 per month adjusted by £150 to reflect the Tenant’s provision of white goods, carpets and curtains, the Tenant’s liability for internal decoration and an unmodernised kitchen.
14. The Landlord provided the Tribunal with a floor plan of the property, photographs and an invoice for a recently replaced washbasin, copies of the service charge account and stated that the carpets and curtains were included. The Landlord states that there is an outstanding repair required on the roof but at present this matter rests with the managing agent.
15. The Tenant states that carpets are included but these are old. The flat has no central heating or double glazing.
16. The property has an energy performance rating ‘D’.
The Law
17. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
18. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar
CHI/00HN/F77/2022/0030
4 properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and
(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
19. The Tribunal also has to have regard to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 where applicable. Most objections and determinations of registered rents are now subject to the Order, which limits the amount of rent that can be charged by linking increases to the Retail Price Index. It is the duty of the Property Tribunal to arrive at a fair rent under section 70 of the Act but in addition to calculate the maximum fair rent which can be registered according to the rules of the Order. If that maximum rent is below the fair rent calculated as above, then that (maximum) sum must be registered as the fair rent for the subject property.
Valuation
20. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only, with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
21. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal's own general knowledge of market rent levels in the area of Bournemouth. Having done so it concluded that such a likely market rent would be £750 per calendar month.
22. However, the property was not let in a condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it was first necessary to adjust that hypothetical rent of £750 per calendar month particularly to reflect the Tenants’ provision of white goods and curtains, the old carpets, Tenant’s liability for internal decoration, lack of central heating and double glazing and general condition.
23. The Tribunal therefore considered that this required a total deduction of £220 per month made up as follows:
Lack of central heating /double glazing £50 White goods £30 Carpets and curtains £30 Unmodernised kitchen £50 Tenant’s liability for internal decoration £20 General condition and mould £40 TOTAL £220 per month
CHI/00HN/F77/2022/0030
5 24. The Tribunal did not consider that there was any substantial scarcity element in the area of Bournemouth.
Decision
25. Having made the adjustments indicated above the fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was accordingly £530 per calendar month including £67.40 for services.
26. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Committee is below the maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, £618.40, details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice and accordingly that rent limit has no effect.
Accordingly the sum of £530 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from the 3rd August 2022 this being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £117 per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for tenant under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £800 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £3000 per Quarter
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Listed Thatched House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for a Property in London
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined a fair rent of £530 per month.
- The property's lack of central heating and double glazing reduced its rental value.
- The tenant's provision of white goods and old carpets reduced the rent.
- The unmodernised kitchen and tenant's liability for internal decoration reduced the rent.
- The general condition of the property and mould growth reduced the rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £530 per month for a property in Bournemouth.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, location, and the lack of certain amenities like central heating and double glazing.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the lack of modern amenities.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and amenities of their property when arguing for a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs, a floor plan, and a service charge account were important pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if they receive permission.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
