VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property, setting it at £124.46 per week. They took into account the property's condition and current market conditions.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions and the state of repair of the property.

Topics

fair rentproperty conditionmarket conditions

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering various factors including the property's condition and market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering the property's condition and market conditions. The Tribunal concluded that the fair rent should be £124.46 per week, effective from 30 November 2021.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/18UH/F77/2021/0050

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Buckfastleigh, Devon, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord Mr [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £124.46 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 30 November 2021

3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £130.00 per Week.

[NAME] of decision 30 November 2021

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 312.0

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 289.2

X 312.0 Minus Y 289.2 = (A) 22.8

(A) 22.8 Divided by Y 289.2 = (B) 0.0788

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1288

Last registered rent* £114.85 Multiplied by (C) = 129.64 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £130.00

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £130.00 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Page 1 of 6

Case reference : CHI/18UH/F77/2021/0050 Tenant : Mrs [APPELLANT] Landlord : Mr [APPELLANT] C/o [NAME] :

[ADDRESS], Buckfastleigh, Devon, [POSTCODE]

Date of Objection : Referred to First-tier Tribunal

by Valuation Office Agency on

15th October 2021

Type of Application : Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (the Act)

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME] of Decision : 30th November 2021

_______________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Page 2 of 6

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 30th November 2021 that the rent would be £124.46 per week (pw) with effect from the same date.

2. On the 28th July 2021 the landlord's agent of the above property applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £131.25 pw. The rent having been previously determined by the Rent Officer at £114.85 pw on 24th May 2019 and effective from the 23rd May 2019.

3. On the 2nd September 2021 the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £124.46 pw effective from the 1st September 2021.

4. The Landlord objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property).

5. The tenancy appears to be a statutory protected periodic tenancy. There is no written tenancy agreement and the Tribunal is advised the tenancy commenced on 7th November 1987. The tenancy (not being for a fixed periodic tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the landlord's statutory repairing obligations).

Factual Background and Submissions 6. Following the Directions dated 22nd October 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises. A hearing was not requested in the current proceedings.

7. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience, the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

8. The property is described is a terrace house with gas central heating and double glazing.

9. The accommodation comprises: 2 reception rooms, kitchen, 3 bedrooms bathroom and WC. Outside: car space, store and gardens.

10. The property was let unfurnished.

11. All mains services are assumed to be connected.

12. The Tribunal noted during its consideration:

a) The property was let unfurnished.

b) Dated Kitchen and Bathroom Fittings.

13. The Tenant did not complete the Reply Form.

Page 3 of 6

14. The Landlord's agent completed the Reply Form. In which he stated:

a) The Rent Register has not been updated to include gas central heating (installed in 2020) and double glazing.

b) The bathroom was updated approximately 10 years ago by the Tenant.

c) The kitchen is 35 years old but in good condition.

d) [NAME] was let on the open market for £695.00 per calendar month (£160.38 per week). Gas central heating, 3 bedrooms, parking front and rear gardens. Furnishings are not included and the Landlord is responsible for all repairs and decoration.

e) The agent's assessment of rental value is £525.00 per 4 weeks (£131.25 per week). £525.00 x 13 =£6,825/52 = 131.25.

f) The Fair rent should reflect the improvements made to the property.

g) Demand for family homes remains constant and evidence of rents achieved reflects current lack of supply.

The Law 15. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.

16. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92, the Court of Appeal emphasised:

(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for ‘scarcity’ (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent -

to that of the regulated tenancy) and

(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).

17. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 restricts the amount by which the rent may be increased to a maximum 5.oo% plus RPI since the last registration.

Page 4 of 6

18. The only exception to this restriction is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent.

Tribunal’s deliberations 19. The Tribunal considered the matter with the benefit of the submissions of the parties. The Tribunal does not take into consideration the personal circumstances of the Landlord or Tenant in making its determination (including issues between Landlord and Tenant which do not affect the rental value of the property itself).

20. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rates the property at E and the certificate expires on 2nd September 2029. The minimum standard is Rating E (unless exempt) for offering a property to let on the open market the Tribunal considers that a rating of this level would have an adverse effect on the rent achievable.

21. The Tribunal looked at the Rent Officer's valuation of the Fair Rent under Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. The Rent Officer had started with a market rent for the property assuming it was in good repair and available in the market today. He found that the Market Rent would be £183.46 pw. However, he then considered that certain deductions should be made to reflect the condition, facilities and differing nature of the tenancy. He concluded that the sum of £59.00 pw should be deducted from the market rent to reflect these matters, which included, but not exclusively: Tenant repairing and decorating liability, no white goods, no floor covering or curtains and un-modernised kitchen and bathroom. He made no adjustment for scarcity (see explanation below). The result was a Fair Rent of £124.46 pw.

22. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in the wider area of Devon. Having done so, it concluded that, after considering the observations of the Rent Officer, his calculation of market rent was correct and that it was appropriate to make a deduction of £59.00 pw to reflect those matters in paragraph 20 above.

23. The Tribunal makes a finding of fact that the work carried out by the Landlord does not increase the rental value by in excess of 15.00% and consequently the property does not fall outside the provisions of the of the Maximum Fair Rent Order (explained above).

24. The Tribunal confirms the fair rent as calculated by the Rent Officer of £124.46 pw.

Page 5 of 6

Scarcity 25. The matters taken into account by the Tribunal when assessing scarcity were:- a) The Tribunal interpreted the ‘locality’ for scarcity purposes as being the area the wider area of Devon (i.e. a sufficiently large area to eliminate the effect of any localised amenity which would, in itself, tend to increase or decrease rent. b) Local Authority and Housing Association waiting lists. c) House prices which could be an indicator of increased availability of housing and a reduction in scarcity. d) Submissions of the parties. e) The members of the Tribunal have between them many years of experience of the residential letting market and that experience leads them to the view that there is no substantial shortage of similar houses available to let in the locality defined above.

26. Assessing a scarcity percentage cannot be a precise arithmetical calculation because there is no way of knowing either the exact number of people looking for a particular type of house in the private sector or the exact number of such properties available. It can only be a judgment based on the years of experience of members of the Tribunal. However, the Tribunal did not consider that there was a substantial scarcity element and accordingly made no further deduction for scarcity.

27. The Tribunal confirms the Fair Rent at £124.46 pw.

Relevant Law 28. The Rent Act 1977.

29. Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. In particular paragraph 7 which states:

This article does not apply in respect of a dwelling-house if because of a change in the condition of the dwelling-house or the common parts as a result of repairs or improvements (including the replacement of any fixture or fitting) carried out by the landlord or a superior landlord, the rent that is determined in response to an application for registration of a new rent under Part IV exceeds by at least 15% the previous rent registered or confirmed.

Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 30. The rent to be registered is not limited by the Fair Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 because it is below the maximum fair rent (see calculation on reverse of decision sheet) of £130.00 pw and accordingly the sum of £124.46 pw will be registered as the fair rent on and with effect from 30th November 2021 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.

Page 6 of 6

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that considers the current market conditions.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that takes into account the property's state of repair.
  • The fair rent is calculated according to the Rent Act 1977.
  • Relevant orders, such as the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, are considered in determining the fair rent.
  • The Retail Price Index is taken into account when calculating the fair rent.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the fair rent for a property at £124.46 per week.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and current market conditions, ensuring the rent was fair.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the current market conditions.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market conditions.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and current market conditions when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property's condition and comparable market rents were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving disputes over fair rent.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.