First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Brighton Property at £210 Weekly
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £210 per week for a property in Brighton, considering factors like the property's condition, lack of central heating, and the tenant's provision of furnishings.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market rent levels, adjusted for certain factors such as the absence of central heating and the tenant's provision of furnishings.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £210 per week for a property in Brighton, taking into account various factors including the property's condition and market rent levels.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £210 per week for a property in Brighton, taking into account the property's condition, lack of central heating, and the tenant's provision of furnishings, among other factors.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00ML/F77/2021/0020
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 55 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord [COMPANY]
Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £210.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 07 April 2021
3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £214.00 prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 7 April 2021
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 296.0
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 283.0
X 296.0 Minus Y 283.0 = (A) 13.0
(A) 13.0 Divided by Y 283.0 = (B) 0.0459
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.0959
Last registered rent* £195.00 Multiplied by (C) = 213.70 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £214.00
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £214.00 Per Week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference : CHI/00ML/F77/2021/0020
Property : 55 [ADDRESS]
[POSTCODE]
Landlord : [COMPANY] : [NAME]
Tenant : Mrs [COUNSEL] : None
Type of Application : Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.
Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] BS. [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] Mr [NAME] and Venue of Inspection : 7th April 2021
Date of Decision : 7th April 2021
_______________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Ref CHI/00ML/F77/2021/0020
2
Summary of Decision
On 7th April 2021 the Tribunal determined a fair rent of £210 per week with effect from 7th April 2021.
Background
1. On 3rd December 2020 the Landlord’s Agent applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £12,168 per annum for the above property. This equates to £1,014 per month or £234 per week.
2. The rent was previously registered on the 21st January 2019 at £195 per week with effect from 18th February 2019. This equates to £845 per month.
3. The rent was registered by the Rent Officer on 13th January 2021 at a figure of £200 per week which equates to £866.67 per month. This rent would take effect from 18th February 2021.
4. On 28th January 2021 the Landlord’s Agent objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to the First Tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property) formerly a Rent Assessment Committee.
5. The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and of Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.
6. The Tribunal office informed the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent on the basis of written representations subject to the parties requesting an oral hearing. No request was made by the parties for a hearing.
7. The Tribunal office informed the parties that the Tribunal might also consider information about the property available on the internet.
8. The parties were invited to include photographs and video within their representations if they so wished. Representations were made which were copied to both parties.
Submissions 9. The property is described within the papers as a terraced house with accommodation including a Basement, two Rooms, a Kitchen, two Bedrooms and a Shower room with WC. Outside there is a small yard. Some windows are double glazed, the only heating is from three night-storage heaters.
10. The house is on the corner of [ADDRESS] and [ADDRESS] within a residential area of similar properties just over one mile from Brighton
Case Ref CHI/00ML/F77/2021/0020
3 seafront. There is a Public House on the opposite corner and local shops within reasonable walking distance.
11. The Tenant has occupied the property since 1970. In her submissions the Tenant states that the carpets, curtains and white goods are provided by her. It is accepted by the Landlord’s Agent that works are needed to remedy some dampness at ground level and the Tenant maintains that the basement is unusable.
12. In his assessment of the property the Rent Officer suggests an open market rent of £275 per week which equates to £1,192 per month which is then adjusted to reflect the Tenant’s liability for internal decoration and repair, and the Tenant’s provision of carpets, curtains and white goods. A further reduction is made to reflect a dated Kitchen.
13. The Tribunal had regard to the observations and comments by the parties and also relied on its own knowledge and experience of local rental values in determining the rent.
The Law
14. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
15. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and
(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
16. The Tribunal also has to have regard to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 where applicable. Most objections and determinations of registered rents are now subject to the Order, which limits the amount of rent that can be charged by linking increases to the Retail Price Index. It is the duty of the Property Tribunal to arrive at a fair rent under section 70 of the Act but in addition to calculate the maximum fair rent which can be registered according to the rules of the Order. If that maximum rent is below
Case Ref CHI/00ML/F77/2021/0020
4 the fair rent calculated as above, then that (maximum) sum must be registered as the fair rent for the subject property.
Valuation
17. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only, with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
18. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal's own general knowledge of market rent levels in Brighton. Having done so it concluded that such a likely market rent would be £1,200 per calendar month.
19. However, from the submissions the Tribunal concluded that the property was not let in a condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore it was first necessary to adjust that hypothetical rent of £1,200 per calendar month.
20. The Tribunal decided that the rent should be adjusted by £120 per month to reflect the lack of central heating, £30 per month to reflect the Tenant’s provision of carpets and curtains and a further £20 for white goods. Further deductions of £30 to reflect the Tenant’s liability for internal repairs and decorations, £50 to reflect the dated Kitchen and £40 per month to reflect internal dampness and the unusable basement.
21. The Tribunal therefore considered that this required a total deduction of £290 per month so that the Fair Rent assessed is £910 per month equating to £210 per week.
22. The Tribunal did not consider that there was any substantial scarcity element in the Brighton and Hove area.
Decision
23. Having made the adjustments indicated above the fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was accordingly £210 per week.
24. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Committee is below the maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice.
Accordingly the sum of £210 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from the 7th April 2021 being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.
Case Ref CHI/00ML/F77/2021/0020
5
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £87.00 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Registered Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent for tenant under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Maximum Fair Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under relevant Rent Acts.
- The fair rent must reflect the property's condition and local market conditions.
- Adjustments are made for specific conditions of the property, such as the absence of central heating.
- The fair rent is often capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- The Retail Price Index is used to calculate the maximum fair rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £210 per week for a property in Brighton.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, market rent levels, and adjustments for factors like the lack of central heating.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the adjustment for the lack of central heating and the tenant's provision of furnishings.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect a fair rent determination that takes into account the property's condition and market rent levels.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included the property's condition, market rent levels, and the tenant's provision of furnishings.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
