VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent for a protected tenancy, considering the property's condition and the local market conditions. The decision was based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and the local market conditions.

Topics

fair rent determinationprotected tenancyrent regulation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a protected tenancy, adjusting for the property's condition and scarcity in the market.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent for a protected tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and local market conditions. The decision was based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BK/F77/2024/0003

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 91B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

R [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £1026.14 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 5th March 2024

3. The amount for services is £46.64 Per month

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

n/a Per n/a

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £1056.58 per month including £46.64 per month for services (variable).

Chairman R [NAME] of decision 5th March 2024

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 378.00

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 314.30

X 378.00 Minus Y 314.30 = (A) 63.70

(A) 63.70 Divided by Y 314.30 = (B) 0.20267

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.2527

Last registered rent* 781.61 Multiplied by (C) = 979.12 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £979.50

Variable service charge YES If YES add amount for services £46.64

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1026.14 Per Month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: FL/LON/OOBK/F77/2024/0003 Property : 91B [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant

: Mrs [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal

: Mr R [NAME] (Hons) MA LLM

FRICS HMCTS Code : Determination on papers Date of Decision : 5th March 2024 Date of Statement of Reasons: 5th March 2024 _______________________________________________

Statement of Reasons

____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

Decision FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

1.The decision of the tribunal is that a fair rent of £1026.14 per month inclusive of £46.64 per month of services, is determined with an effective date of 5th March 2024. Background 2. An application was made to re-register a fair rent by the landlord [RESPONDENT]. Prior to the application to re-register a fair rent, the Rent Officer had registered a rent of £790 per month with £8.39 per month for services, included in afore going rent, with effect from 30th November 2021.

3. Subsequently the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £991.00 per month with £46.64 per month included in the foregoing rent, attributed to services with effect from 30th November 2023.

4. In a note dated 28th November 2023 submitted by the tenant an objection was made to the rent registered and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property).

5. Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 12th January 2024. Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the Property and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. The Property 6. Neither party requested an inspection, and the tribunal did not consider an inspection proportionate. The property is a self-contained with full central heating, comprising two rooms, one kitchen and a bathroom. Relevant Law 7. Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as

3

amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal 9.-(1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] (2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.

(3) There shall be disregarded-

4

(a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”

Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the Property. It also disregards the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the Property. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:

(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be

5

adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject property).

In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent. Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Submissions Landlord 8. No submissions from the landlord were received, other than the application to re register a fair rent. Tenant 9. In a letter to the Rent Officer from the Tenant, the Tenant noted; “there was an ongoing problem with the bathroom waste pipe (frequently blocked it appears that the leaseholder is denial of responsibility.” “The service charge of £54.33 per month for auto light in hall a time of 3 minutes hallway vacuum cleaning ...which is very frequent is of charged to the three flats is £163.00 x 12 = £12956 which is very high. “

6

“An increase of 25% is quite unreasonable”. Within the tenant's objection, it was noted; That no improvements had been carried out over the last 10 years A council improvement order had led to secondary double glazing in living room and bedroom, plus 5 cupboards installed, a hob, oven in the kitchen and a four radiators system. That the 20% increase would be financially crippling.” The tenant also submitted a Reply Form which further described the property including; Cracking in the living room ceiling Basic units only in the kitchen with oven and hob Bathroom contains the original cast iron enamelled bath A dehumidifier is need to keep damp down. The Determination Reasons for Decision 10. The rent to be determined must reflect the condition found on the date of the hearing disregarding all tenants' improvements.

11. The process for determining a fair rent is the application of Rent Act 1977 section 70 on the subject property and then comparison with the maximum rent permitted under the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999. This means that comparison with other properties the subject of Fair Rent is not material.

12. Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Considering evidence submitted and the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that the rent was £1800.00 per month if let on a contemporary assured shorthold basis.

7

13. The Property is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent, therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent, a deduction of 10 % is made. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions and goods supplied under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparables are derived. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted. The calculation 14. The rent of £1800.00 per month is on the basis of an assured shorthold tenancy where the tenant would not be responsible for the service charge. The protected tenant is in this case liable for the service charge of £ 46.64 per month. The tenant within this protected tenancy is liable for the service charge. Prior therefore to any adjustments for condition, tenancy terms and scarcity a deduction of the service charge is made.

15. The rent prior to adjustment for condition, terms and scarcity, but adjusted for service charge is £1800.00 per month Less service charge £46.64 per month ------------------------ £1753.36 per month

Less 20% condition Less £350.67 per month -------------------------- £ 1402.69 per month Less 10% for terms and supplied goods inc white goods £140.26 per month

8

------------------------------------------- £ 1262.42 per month Less 20% for scarcity. £252.48 per month ------------------------------------------

16. The rent after this final adjustment was £1009.94 per month. Add back the monthly service charge £46.64 per month which gives £1056.58 per month including service charge. Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 17. The rent to be registered is limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999. The rent calculated in accordance with the Order is £1026.14 including £46.64 per month within it attributable for services. This figure is lower than the figure calculated by reference to the market rent with adjustments, of £1056.58 per month with £46.64 per month attributed for services.

18.

Accordingly, the sum of £1026.14 per month including a service charge of £46.64 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 2nd June 2023, being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. Valuer Chair: [NAME]: 5th March 2024 Extended reasons: 5th March 2024

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

9

b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent reflecting the property's condition and local market conditions.
  • The rent is calculated according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The rent is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
  • The fair rent is set by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No specific losing factors were identified in the provided similar cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent for a protected tenancy, considering the property's condition and local market conditions.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord in a protected tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, considering the property's condition and local market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the local market conditions.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and the local market conditions when seeking a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence regarding the property's condition and local market conditions mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.