VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property, setting it at £210 per week. They considered the property's condition, recent improvements, and the current market value to determine the fair rent.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions and the state of the property.

Topics

tenancyfair rentproperty valuation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering various factors affecting the property's value.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering the property's condition, improvements, and market value. The decision was made on 12 April 2024 by Judge Rosanna Foskett and Mrs Alison Flynn.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

Page 1 of 3

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AZ/F77/2024/0075

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 1 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge Foskett Mrs Flynn MA MRICS

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £210 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 12 April 2024

3. The amount for services is N/A Per

not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the below the maximum fair rent of £ 234 per week prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Judge Foskett Mrs Flynn Date of decision 12 April 2024

Page 2 of 3

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 381

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 314.3

X 381 Minus Y 314.3 = (A) 66.7

(A) 66.7 Divided by Y 314.3 = (B) 0.212218

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.262218

Last registered rent* 185 Multiplied by (C) = 233.51 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 234

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £234 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the

Page 3 of 3

formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. The previous fair rent for this property registered on 29 November 2021 (with effect from 10 January 2022) was £185 per week (with the capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999).

2. The Landlord indicated in an email to the Valuation Office on 26 October 2023 that it considered that the rent registered with effect from 10 January 2024 was too low because it had carried out internal and external works at a cost of approximately £22,600 and applied for a re-registration of the fair rent at £240.50 per week. The Tenant told the Tribunal at the inspection (see below) that these works were carried out in around July 2023.

3. The Rent Officer registered a new rent of £230 per week on 14 December 2023 with effect from 10 January 2024.

4. Following an objection made on 30 December 2023 on behalf of the Tenant to the determination by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection

5. The Tribunal inspected the property on 12 April 2024 in the morning in dry, sunny weather.

Evidence

6. The Tribunal considered the documents that had been sent by the Valuation Office Agency, the Landlord and the Tenant. There was no oral hearing.

Determination and Valuation

7. The property is terraced Victorian house. The accommodation comprises: a. Ground floor: 2 rooms, 1 kitchen and 1 bathroom/WC; b. First floor: 2 bedrooms It has central heating and a courtyard garden (maintained by the tenant, including the painting of the masonry).

8. Having regard to our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area (including by reviewing local properties on Rightmove.co.uk) as well as the list of comparable provided by the Landlord, we consider that the open

market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities it has would be around £420 per week.

9. This hypothetical rent is adjusted as necessary to allow for the differences between the terms and conditions considered usual for such a letting in today’s market and the condition of the actual property at the date of the determination under the Rent Act 1977. Any benefit derived from the tenant’s improvements (if any) is disregarded.

10. The following deductions were made:

Condition of kitchen

10% Condition of bathroom

5% No curtains or white goods provided by landlord 5% Damp

5% Electricity (very few sockets)

5% Poor layout

5% Poor double-glazing installed

2.5% Total

37.5%

11. That gave a fair rent of £262.50 per week (62.5% of £420 = £262.50). 12. A further deduction for scarcity of 20% was then made giving an uncapped fair rent for the purposes of section 70 of the 1977 Act of £210 per week.

Decision

13. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £234 per week (see calculation above). 14. In this case, the lower rent of £210 per week is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.

Chairman: Judge Rosanna Foskett, Mrs [NAME] MA MRICS

Date: 12 April 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was set at £210 per week, excluding water rates and council tax.
  • The effective date for the new fair rent was determined to be 12 April 2024.
  • The Tribunal considered the open market rent for the property to be around £420 per week, based on expert knowledge and local comparisons.
  • Deductions were made for the poor condition of the kitchen, reducing the rent by 10%.
  • A further deduction of 20% was applied for scarcity, leading to an uncapped fair rent of £210 per week.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for a property was set at £210 per week.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition, recent improvements, and the current market value to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the property's condition and the current market value.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition and the current market value when arguing for a fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Documents related to the property's condition, improvements, and market value were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.