First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £768 per month for a regulated tenancy. They considered the property's condition and its market value to determine the fair rent.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by considering the property's condition and market value.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £768 per month for a regulated tenancy, considering the property's condition and market value under the Rent Act 1977.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AN/F77/2023/0169
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is 768.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 12 September 2023
3. The amount for services is
Per
negligible/not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
0.00 Per
negligible/not applicable
5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply do not apply because 1st registration.
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
Chairman E [NAME] of decision 12 September 2023
FR24
Case Reference : LON/00AN/F77/2023/0169
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 22 May 2023
Type of [NAME] : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 12 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
This has been a hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no- one requested the same. The documents that we were referred to were in an electronic bundle the contents of which we have recorded.
The registered rent with effect from 12 September 2023 is £768 per month.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Background
1. On 17 February 2023 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £858 per month for the above property.
2. The tenant has been in occupation of the premises since April 1979. However, the rent had not previously been registered by the rent officer.
3. On 17 April 2023, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £763 per month with effect from the same date.
4. On 22 May 2023 the landlord objected to the registered rent.
5. The tribunal issued Directions on 22 June 2023. The landlord and the tenant made written representations which were copied to the other party.
The Evidence
6. The landlord provided a brief description of the property which comprises three rooms, kitchen, bathroom/wc and shower room/wc on the first and second floors of a three storey terrace house built c1900. He described it as in average condition. He did not provide details of any rental evidence in support of his objection.
7. The tenant stated that she had made the rooms self-contained, rewired, fitted the kitchen, provided a shower room/wc on the first floor, gas central heating, double glazing in the kitchen, bathroom/wc and shower room/wc and insulated the loft. The plasterwork in the flat was in poor condition where it had not been made good following a leak. The remaining windows were the original single glazed sash windows which were draughty. The external decorations were in poor condition. All the electrical appliances, carpets curtains and white goods were the tenant’s.
8. The tenant did not object to the rent registered by the rent officer but was of the opinion that the landlord should carry out the outstanding repairs.
The Law
9. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. The Tribunal is unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.
10. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:
That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and
That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.
Valuation 11. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms that is considered usual for such an open market letting. As neither party had provided any comparable rental evidence I relied on my own general knowledge of rental values in Fulham and concluded that the likely market rent for the property would be £2400 per month.
12. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £2400 per month to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). I determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £1200 to reflect the difference in the terms of the tenancy and the condition of the property, the lack of carpets, curtains and white goods which are usually provided on the open market. I deducted a further 10% to reflect the lack of self- containment 13. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £960 per month. I am of the opinion that there is substantial scarcity for similar properties in Greater London and therefore made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The uncapped fair rent is £768 per month.
Decision
19. Accordingly, the sum of £768 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 12 September 2023 being the date of my decision.
Chairman: [NAME]: 12 September 2023
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
ii. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
iii. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
iv. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal which must be on a point of law, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £225 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for London Basement Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that considers the property's condition.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's market value.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjusted for scarcity or relevant differences.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on market comparables.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that takes into account the property's location.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- There are no significant factors listed that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a fair rent of £768 per month for a regulated tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
They considered the property's condition and market value to determine the fair rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and market value of the property were the most important factors.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the property's condition and market value.
What evidence or documents mattered?
No specific evidence or documents are mentioned, but the condition and market value of the property were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
