First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977. They considered the property's condition and local demand to set the fair rent. The decision was made on 16 January 2019 by two tribunal members.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation that adheres to the Rent Act 1977 and the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering various factors including the property's condition and local demand.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering the property's condition and local demand. The decision was made by Mr B Simms FRICS and Mr M Donaldson FRICS MCIArb MAE on 16 January 2019.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/43UF/F77/2018/0068
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 19 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord BPT (Bradford Property Trust) Limited
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £1,004.50 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 16 January 2019
3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £1,260.00 per calendar month.
[NAME] of decision 16 January 2019
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 284.6
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 264.8
X 284.6 Minus Y 264.8 = (A) 19.8
(A) 19.8 Divided by Y 264.8 = (B) 0.074773
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.124773
Last registered rent* £893.00 Multiplied by (C) = 1004.42 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £1,004.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £1,004.50 Per Calendar Month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/43UF/F77/2018/0068 Property : 19 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Type of Application : Determination of a fair rent: Rent Act 1977 Date of Decision : 16 January 2019
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 06 September 2018 the landlord’s agent made an application to register the rent of the property at £1,027.00 per calendar month.
2. On 23 October 2018 the Rent Officer registered the rent at £1,003.50 per calendar month exclusive of rates with effect from 03 December 2018.
3. On 31 October 2018 the Tenant objected and the matter was referred to the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber). Directions were issued dated 16 December 2018.
4. The Tenant made brief representations to the Rent Officer who organised a consultation at the property. Neither party submitted representations in response to Directions or requested an oral hearing.
Inspection
5. On 16 January 2019 the Tribunal inspected the property accompanied by the Tenant, the Landlord was not represented.
2 6. The property is a three bedroom semi-detached house probably constructed in the 1930s of brick with rendered elevations under a pitched, tile-covered roof. It was not in good condition. There is however serious damp penetration to the chimney breast in the larger front bedroom and the external gable rendering is beginning to crack.
7. The accommodation comprises: Ground Floor: Entrance Hall; Living Room; Kitchen fitted with worktops, cupboards and stainless steel sink. First Floor: Landing; Three Bedrooms; Bathroom with W.C. bath and washbasin.
8. There is gas-fired central heating and an electric immersion heater.
Representations
9. When making her objection to the rent fixed by the Rent Officer the Tenant pointed out her personal circumstances and said she could not afford the increase. The Landlord did not make any representations.
The law
10. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It must also disregard the personal circumstances of the Landlord or the Tenant and the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
11. Ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms (other than as to rent) to that of the regulated tenancy).
12. For the purpose of determining the market rent, assured tenancy rents (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
Valuation
13. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today on the terms and in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting.
14. Neither party provided any evidence of open market lettings, so we therefore relied on the general information provided by the rent service and our own knowledge of general rent levels for this type of property in the locality and determined that the starting point should be £1,600.00 per calendar month.
15. However, the rent referred to in the above paragraph is on the basis of a modern open market letting of a centrally heated property where the tenant has no liability to carry out repairs or decorations and the landlord supplies white goods, carpets and curtains.
3 16. In this case there is central heating but the Tenant supplies her own white goods, carpets and curtains and the terms of this tenancy require the tenant to carry out internal decorations. The house is not in good condition. A deduction must be made for these differences. The Tribunal has therefore made the following deductions from the starting point of £1,600.00 per calendar month.
a. Decorating obligations
£20.00 b. Carpets/curtains
£60.00 c. White goods
£40.00 d. Dated kitchen and bathroom fittings
£50.00 e. General disrepair
£30.00
Total deductions
£200.00 per month
17. We then considered the question of scarcity as referred to in paragraph 11 above. There is strong demand in this locality and a limited supply so we concluded that there should be an adjustment of 10% on the net rent, £140.
18. We therefore determined that the uncapped Fair Rent is £1,260.00 per calendar month exclusive of council tax and water rates.
19. As this amount is above the rent calculated in accordance with the Maximum Fair Rent Order details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice we determine that the lower sum of £1,004.50 per calendar month is registered as the fair rent with effect from 16 January 2019.
Chairman: [NAME]: 16 January 2019
PERMISSION TO APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First- tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £900 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Controlled Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Protected Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent is determined by the Tribunal based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.|The fair rent reflects the market rent adjusted for the property’s condition and scarcity of similar properties.|The fair rent is calculated according to the Retail Price Index and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.|The fair rent is determined according to the Rent Act 1977 and the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999.|The fair rent calculation includes adjustments for tenant improvements and deficiencies in the property’s condition.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The fair rent calculation is subject to statutory caps.|The fair rent is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977 was set at £1,004.50 per calendar month.
Who was involved?
The tenant objected to the rent fixed by the Rent Officer, and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the property's condition and local demand, applying the Rent Act 1977 and the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the local demand for similar properties.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that the tenant could afford.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local demand when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and local demand for similar properties were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
