First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property in Northolt, taking into account the market rent and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. This decision was guided by the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market conditions and the scarcity of similar properties in the locality.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, considering various factors including the market rent and scarcity of similar properties.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent for a property located in Northolt, considering the market rent and the scarcity of similar properties in the locality. The decision was made in light of the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AJ/F77/2021/0291
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 74 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
[APPELLANT]
[NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £884 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 17 January 2022
3. The amount for services is
Per
negligible/not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
negligible/not applicable
5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
The property has central heating provided by the landlord
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ .................................................................................................................................................................... per .................................. including £ ...................... per ................................ for services (variable).
(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ 981 ... per month ........ including £ ......................................... per ................................ for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 17 January 2022
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 314.3
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 291.7
X 314.3 Minus Y 291.7 = (A) 22.6
(A) 22.6 Divided by Y 291.7 = (B) 0.077476
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.127476
Last registered rent* £870 Multiplied by (C) = £980.9 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £981
Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £981 Per Month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the
variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AJ/F77/2021/0291
HMCTS code :
P: PAPERREMOTE
Property : 74 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Landlord : [COMPANY] : None Tenant : Miss [COUNSEL] : In Person Type of Application : Determination of a fair rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 Tribunal Members :
Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Decision :
17 January 2022
Date of Reasons : 17 February 2022
REASONS
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing
This has been a remote hearing on the papers. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. The Directions dated 30 April 2021 set out that the tribunal was not able to hold face to face hearings or carry out internal inspections. The decision made is described at the end of these reasons.
Background
1. On 6 August 2021, the Landlord applied for registration of a fair rent of £1,100 per month.
2. The Rent Officer registered a rent of £875 per month. The rent was registered on 21 September 2021 and is effective from 6 October 2021. The rent was the s70 rent which was below the capped rent.
3. Accommodation is a self-contained purpose built flat without central heating consisting of 3 rooms, kitchen, bathroom/WC.
4. The previous registered rent was £870 per month and was registered on 14 August 2019 and effective from 6 October 2019. The rent was the s70 rent which was below the capped rent.
5. The Landlord objected to the registered rent by letter dated 20 October 2021 and the matter was referred to the tribunal.
6. On 11 November 2021, the tribunal issued Directions for proceeding by written representations.
Evidence
The Landlord’s Case
7. No evidence was submitted by the Landlord
The Tenant’s case
8. No evidence was submitted by the Tenant.
Inspection
9. In accordance with the directions the tribunal did not inspect the property. The tribunal took into account photographs on [ADDRESS] which show limited detail.
The Law
10. When determining a fair rent in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, the tribunal has regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property.
11. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasized that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property.
12. The rent has been previously registered, and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 therefore applies unless there are significant improvements made by the Landlord which increase the rent which would be registered by more than 15%. There are no such improvements in this case
Discussion and Valuation
13. In the absence of any evidence provided by the parties the tribunal has relied on its knowledge and experience.
14. The tribunal firstly has to consider the rent in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act as a market rent less scarcity. The tribunal has applied its knowledge and experience and considers that the rent (inclusive of services) for the subject property, in this location, and in the condition and with the amenities which the market would expect, would be £1,300 per month. The tribunal has adjusted for the condition of the property, lack of white goods and for the different terms of the tenancy as compared with a standard assured shorthold tenancy and makes a deduction of 15% for these factors.
15. The Tribunal found that there was substantial scarcity of letting property in the locality of Greater London and using its knowledge and experience made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent. The calculation of the s70 rent is set out below.
PCM Market rent 1,300.00 £ less condition & terms 15% 195.00 -£ adjusted rent 1,105.00 £ less scarcity off adj rent 20% 221.00 -£ Fair rent 884.00 £
Capped rent
16. In accordance with the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 the maximum rent is the previous registered rent increased in accordance with the Order which provides for the previous rent to be increased by the percentage increase in the retail prices index plus 5% if the application is a second or later application since 1 February 1999.
17. The previous registered rent was £870 per month. The retail prices index figure to be used is the figure published in the month before the decision. The decision was made in January, and the figure published in December was 314.3 and which is the upper figure to be used. The index at the date of the last registration was 291.7. Applying the formula produces a maximum fair rent of £981.00 per month which is above the s70 rent of £884 per month.
18. The rent to be registered is the lower of the two figures and is the s70 rent of £884.00 per month.
19. The effective date is the date of the decision which is 17 January 2022.
[NAME] [NAME] - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
• The Tribunal is required to set out rights of appeal against its decisions by virtue of the rule 36 (2)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and these are set out below.
• If a party wishes to appeal against this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
• The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
• If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
• The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined a market rent of £1,300 per month for the property, considering its location and amenities.
- A 15% deduction was applied to the market rent due to the property's condition, lack of white goods, and different tenancy terms.
- A 20% deduction was made from the adjusted market rent due to the substantial scarcity of letting properties in Greater London.
- The fair rent was determined to be £884 per month, which was lower than the maximum fair rent allowed by the capping provisions.
- The maximum fair rent was calculated by increasing the previous registered rent by the retail prices index percentage and an additional 5%.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's application for a fair rent of £1,100 per month was not accepted as the final registered rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal set a fair rent of £884 per month for a property in Northolt.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the market rent and the scarcity of similar properties in the locality.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The scarcity of similar properties in the locality was a key factor in determining the fair rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the market conditions.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the market rent and the scarcity of similar properties when disputing a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property and comparable rental data were likely considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
